diff options
author | Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> | 2011-12-18 20:00:12 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com> | 2012-01-17 15:10:19 -0600 |
commit | 2813d682e8e6a278f94817429afd46b30875bb6e (patch) | |
tree | d865b04ec89076b692a922b7f5fced9be0458f47 /fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | |
parent | ce7ae151ddada3dbf67301464343c154903166b3 (diff) | |
download | linux-2813d682e8e6a278f94817429afd46b30875bb6e.tar.gz linux-2813d682e8e6a278f94817429afd46b30875bb6e.tar.bz2 linux-2813d682e8e6a278f94817429afd46b30875bb6e.zip |
xfs: remove the i_new_size field in struct xfs_inode
Now that we use the VFS i_size field throughout XFS there is no need for the
i_new_size field any more given that the VFS i_size field gets updated
in ->write_end before unlocking the page, and thus is always uptodate when
writeback could see a page. Removing i_new_size also has the advantage that
we will never have to trim back di_size during a failed buffered write,
given that it never gets updated past i_size.
Note that currently the generic direct I/O code only updates i_size after
calling our end_io handler, which requires a small workaround to make
sure di_size actually makes it to disk. I hope to fix this properly in
the generic code.
A downside is that we lose the support for parallel non-overlapping O_DIRECT
appending writes that recently was added. I don't think keeping the complex
and fragile i_new_size infrastructure for this is a good tradeoff - if we
really care about parallel appending writers we should investigate turning
the iolock into a range lock, which would also allow for parallel
non-overlapping buffered writers.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 2 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h index cd99e43fa8f0..2f27b7454085 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h @@ -246,8 +246,6 @@ typedef struct xfs_inode { xfs_icdinode_t i_d; /* most of ondisk inode */ - xfs_fsize_t i_new_size; /* size when write completes */ - /* VFS inode */ struct inode i_vnode; /* embedded VFS inode */ } xfs_inode_t; |