diff options
author | Srinivas Eeda <srinivas.eeda@oracle.com> | 2010-07-19 16:04:12 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> | 2010-08-07 10:44:40 -0700 |
commit | 7beaf243787f85a2ef9213ccf13ab4a243283fde (patch) | |
tree | 689e5a447ee2b7b83fcaccf2959ca8dd5b0fb359 /fs | |
parent | 6d98c3ccb52f692f1a60339dde7c700686a5568b (diff) | |
download | linux-7beaf243787f85a2ef9213ccf13ab4a243283fde.tar.gz linux-7beaf243787f85a2ef9213ccf13ab4a243283fde.tar.bz2 linux-7beaf243787f85a2ef9213ccf13ab4a243283fde.zip |
ocfs2 fix o2dlm dlm run purgelist (rev 3)
This patch fixes two problems in dlm_run_purgelist
1. If a lockres is found to be in use, dlm_run_purgelist keeps trying to purge
the same lockres instead of trying the next lockres.
2. When a lockres is found unused, dlm_run_purgelist releases lockres spinlock
before setting DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF and calls dlm_purge_lockres.
spinlock is reacquired but in this window lockres can get reused. This leads
to BUG.
This patch modifies dlm_run_purgelist to skip lockres if it's in use and purge
next lockres. It also sets DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF before releasing the
lockres spinlock protecting it from getting reused.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Eeda <srinivas.eeda@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@oracle.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c | 80 |
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 46 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c index d4f73ca68fe5..dd78ca3f360f 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c @@ -152,45 +152,25 @@ void dlm_lockres_calc_usage(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock); } -static int dlm_purge_lockres(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, +static void dlm_purge_lockres(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, struct dlm_lock_resource *res) { int master; int ret = 0; - spin_lock(&res->spinlock); - if (!__dlm_lockres_unused(res)) { - mlog(0, "%s:%.*s: tried to purge but not unused\n", - dlm->name, res->lockname.len, res->lockname.name); - __dlm_print_one_lock_resource(res); - spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); - BUG(); - } - - if (res->state & DLM_LOCK_RES_MIGRATING) { - mlog(0, "%s:%.*s: Delay dropref as this lockres is " - "being remastered\n", dlm->name, res->lockname.len, - res->lockname.name); - /* Re-add the lockres to the end of the purge list */ - if (!list_empty(&res->purge)) { - list_del_init(&res->purge); - list_add_tail(&res->purge, &dlm->purge_list); - } - spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); - return 0; - } + assert_spin_locked(&dlm->spinlock); + assert_spin_locked(&res->spinlock); master = (res->owner == dlm->node_num); - if (!master) - res->state |= DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF; - spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); mlog(0, "purging lockres %.*s, master = %d\n", res->lockname.len, res->lockname.name, master); if (!master) { + res->state |= DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF; /* drop spinlock... retake below */ + spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock); spin_lock(&res->spinlock); @@ -208,31 +188,35 @@ static int dlm_purge_lockres(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, mlog(0, "%s:%.*s: dlm_deref_lockres returned %d\n", dlm->name, res->lockname.len, res->lockname.name, ret); spin_lock(&dlm->spinlock); + spin_lock(&res->spinlock); } - spin_lock(&res->spinlock); if (!list_empty(&res->purge)) { mlog(0, "removing lockres %.*s:%p from purgelist, " "master = %d\n", res->lockname.len, res->lockname.name, res, master); list_del_init(&res->purge); - spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); dlm_lockres_put(res); dlm->purge_count--; - } else - spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); + } + + if (!__dlm_lockres_unused(res)) { + mlog(ML_ERROR, "found lockres %s:%.*s: in use after deref\n", + dlm->name, res->lockname.len, res->lockname.name); + __dlm_print_one_lock_resource(res); + BUG(); + } __dlm_unhash_lockres(res); /* lockres is not in the hash now. drop the flag and wake up * any processes waiting in dlm_get_lock_resource. */ if (!master) { - spin_lock(&res->spinlock); res->state &= ~DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF; spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); wake_up(&res->wq); - } - return 0; + } else + spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); } static void dlm_run_purge_list(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, @@ -251,17 +235,7 @@ static void dlm_run_purge_list(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, lockres = list_entry(dlm->purge_list.next, struct dlm_lock_resource, purge); - /* Status of the lockres *might* change so double - * check. If the lockres is unused, holding the dlm - * spinlock will prevent people from getting and more - * refs on it -- there's no need to keep the lockres - * spinlock. */ spin_lock(&lockres->spinlock); - unused = __dlm_lockres_unused(lockres); - spin_unlock(&lockres->spinlock); - - if (!unused) - continue; purge_jiffies = lockres->last_used + msecs_to_jiffies(DLM_PURGE_INTERVAL_MS); @@ -273,15 +247,29 @@ static void dlm_run_purge_list(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, * in tail order, we can stop at the first * unpurgable resource -- anyone added after * him will have a greater last_used value */ + spin_unlock(&lockres->spinlock); break; } + /* Status of the lockres *might* change so double + * check. If the lockres is unused, holding the dlm + * spinlock will prevent people from getting and more + * refs on it. */ + unused = __dlm_lockres_unused(lockres); + if (!unused || + (lockres->state & DLM_LOCK_RES_MIGRATING)) { + mlog(0, "lockres %s:%.*s: is in use or " + "being remastered, used %d, state %d\n", + dlm->name, lockres->lockname.len, + lockres->lockname.name, !unused, lockres->state); + list_move_tail(&dlm->purge_list, &lockres->purge); + spin_unlock(&lockres->spinlock); + continue; + } + dlm_lockres_get(lockres); - /* This may drop and reacquire the dlm spinlock if it - * has to do migration. */ - if (dlm_purge_lockres(dlm, lockres)) - BUG(); + dlm_purge_lockres(dlm, lockres); dlm_lockres_put(lockres); |