diff options
| author | Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> | 2009-08-10 16:03:43 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> | 2009-08-24 16:48:32 +0200 |
| commit | 6d41807614151829ae17a3a58bff8572af5e407e (patch) | |
| tree | 8d507b9ed679e2a42f9e1c8f4e7ba5a958360ea2 /fs | |
| parent | f4b9a988685da6386d7f9a72df3098bcc3270526 (diff) | |
| download | linux-6d41807614151829ae17a3a58bff8572af5e407e.tar.gz linux-6d41807614151829ae17a3a58bff8572af5e407e.tar.bz2 linux-6d41807614151829ae17a3a58bff8572af5e407e.zip | |
ext3: Update Kconfig description of EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED
The old description for this configuration option was perhaps not
completely balanced in terms of describing the tradeoffs of using a
default of data=writeback vs. data=ordered. Despite the fact that old
description very strongly recomended disabling this feature, all of
the major distributions have elected to preserve the existing 'legacy'
default, which is a strong hint that it perhaps wasn't telling the
whole story.
This revised description has been vetted by a number of ext3
developers as being better at informing the user about the tradeoffs
of enabling or disabling this configuration feature.
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/ext3/Kconfig | 32 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ext3/Kconfig b/fs/ext3/Kconfig index fb3c1a21b135..522b15498f45 100644 --- a/fs/ext3/Kconfig +++ b/fs/ext3/Kconfig @@ -29,23 +29,25 @@ config EXT3_FS module will be called ext3. config EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED - bool "Default to 'data=ordered' in ext3 (legacy option)" + bool "Default to 'data=ordered' in ext3" depends on EXT3_FS help - If a filesystem does not explicitly specify a data ordering - mode, and the journal capability allowed it, ext3 used to - historically default to 'data=ordered'. - - That was a rather unfortunate choice, because it leads to all - kinds of latency problems, and the 'data=writeback' mode is more - appropriate these days. - - You should probably always answer 'n' here, and if you really - want to use 'data=ordered' mode, set it in the filesystem itself - with 'tune2fs -o journal_data_ordered'. - - But if you really want to enable the legacy default, you can do - so by answering 'y' to this question. + The journal mode options for ext3 have different tradeoffs + between when data is guaranteed to be on disk and + performance. The use of "data=writeback" can cause + unwritten data to appear in files after an system crash or + power failure, which can be a security issue. However, + "data=ordered" mode can also result in major performance + problems, including seconds-long delays before an fsync() + call returns. For details, see: + + http://ext4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Ext3_data_mode_tradeoffs + + If you have been historically happy with ext3's performance, + data=ordered mode will be a safe choice and you should + answer 'y' here. If you understand the reliability and data + privacy issues of data=writeback and are willing to make + that trade off, answer 'n'. config EXT3_FS_XATTR bool "Ext3 extended attributes" |