[PARISC] Enable interrupts while spinning

Use the __raw_spin_lock_flags routine so we can take an interrupt while
spinning.  This re-fixes a bug jejb found on 2005-10-20:

CPU0 does a flush_tlb_all holding the vmlist_lock for write.
CPU1 tries a cat of /proc/meminfo which tries to acquire vmlist_lock for read
CPU1 is now spinning with interrupts disabled
CPU0 tries to execute a smp_call_function to flush the local tlb caches
This is now a deadlock because CPU1 is spinning with interrupts disabled and
can never receive the IPI

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@parisc-linux.org>

1 files changed, 21 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/include/asm-parisc/spinlock.h b/include/asm-parisc/spinlock.h
index 8980a876cc4e..f3d2090a18dc 100644
--- a/include/asm-parisc/spinlock.h
+++ b/include/asm-parisc/spinlock.h
@@ -57,35 +57,42 @@ static inline int __raw_spin_trylock(raw_spinlock_t *x)
 
 /*
  * Read-write spinlocks, allowing multiple readers but only one writer.
- * The spinlock is held by the writer, preventing any readers or other
- * writers from grabbing the rwlock.  Readers use the lock to serialise their
- * access to the counter (which records how many readers currently hold the
- * lock).  Linux rwlocks are unfair to writers; they can be starved for
- * an indefinite time by readers.  They can also be taken in interrupt context,
- * so we have to disable interrupts when acquiring the spin lock to be sure
- * that an interrupting reader doesn't get an inconsistent view of the lock.
+ * Linux rwlocks are unfair to writers; they can be starved for an indefinite
+ * time by readers.  With care, they can also be taken in interrupt context.
+ *
+ * In the PA-RISC implementation, we have a spinlock and a counter.
+ * Readers use the lock to serialise their access to the counter (which
+ * records how many readers currently hold the lock).
+ * Writers hold the spinlock, preventing any readers or other writers from
+ * grabbing the rwlock.
  */
 
+/* Note that we have to ensure interrupts are disabled in case we're
+ * interrupted by some other code that wants to grab the same read lock */
 static  __inline__ void __raw_read_lock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	local_irq_save(flags);
-	__raw_spin_lock(&rw->lock);
+	__raw_spin_lock_flags(&rw->lock, flags);
 	rw->counter++;
 	__raw_spin_unlock(&rw->lock);
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 
+/* Note that we have to ensure interrupts are disabled in case we're
+ * interrupted by some other code that wants to grab the same read lock */
 static  __inline__ void __raw_read_unlock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	local_irq_save(flags);
-	__raw_spin_lock(&rw->lock);
+	__raw_spin_lock_flags(&rw->lock, flags);
 	rw->counter--;
 	__raw_spin_unlock(&rw->lock);
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 
+/* Note that we have to ensure interrupts are disabled in case we're
+ * interrupted by some other code that wants to grab the same read lock */
 static __inline__ int __raw_read_trylock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
@@ -110,12 +117,14 @@ static __inline__ int __raw_read_trylock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
 	goto retry;
 }
 
+/* Note that we have to ensure interrupts are disabled in case we're
+ * interrupted by some other code that wants to read_trylock() this lock */
 static __inline__ void __raw_write_lock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 retry:
 	local_irq_save(flags);
-	__raw_spin_lock(&rw->lock);
+	__raw_spin_lock_flags(&rw->lock, flags);
 
 	if (rw->counter != 0) {
 		__raw_spin_unlock(&rw->lock);
@@ -138,6 +147,8 @@ static __inline__ void __raw_write_unlock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
 	__raw_spin_unlock(&rw->lock);
 }
 
+/* Note that we have to ensure interrupts are disabled in case we're
+ * interrupted by some other code that wants to read_trylock() this lock */
 static __inline__ int __raw_write_trylock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;