lockdep: fix oops in processing workqueue

Under memory load, on x86_64, with lockdep enabled, the workqueue's
process_one_work() has been seen to oops in __lock_acquire(), barfing
on a 0xffffffff00000000 pointer in the lockdep_map's class_cache[].

Because it's permissible to free a work_struct from its callout function,
the map used is an onstack copy of the map given in the work_struct: and
that copy is made without any locking.

Surprisingly, gcc (4.5.1 in Hugh's case) uses "rep movsl" rather than
"rep movsq" for that structure copy: which might race with a workqueue
user's wait_on_work() doing lock_map_acquire() on the source of the
copy, putting a pointer into the class_cache[], but only in time for
the top half of that pointer to be copied to the destination map.

Boom when process_one_work() subsequently does lock_map_acquire()
on its onstack copy of the lockdep_map.

Fix this, and a similar instance in call_timer_fn(), with a
lockdep_copy_map() function which additionally NULLs the class_cache[].

Note: this oops was actually seen on 3.4-next, where flush_work() newly
does the racing lock_map_acquire(); but Tejun points out that 3.4 and
earlier are already vulnerable to the same through wait_on_work().

* Patch orginally from Peter.  Hugh modified it a bit and wrote the
  description.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Reported-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
LKML-Reference: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1205070951170.1544@eggly.anvils>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
index d36619ead3ba..00e46376e28f 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -157,6 +157,24 @@ struct lockdep_map {
 #endif
 };
 
+static inline void lockdep_copy_map(struct lockdep_map *to,
+				    struct lockdep_map *from)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	*to = *from;
+	/*
+	 * Since the class cache can be modified concurrently we could observe
+	 * half pointers (64bit arch using 32bit copy insns). Therefore clear
+	 * the caches and take the performance hit.
+	 *
+	 * XXX it doesn't work well with lockdep_set_class_and_subclass(), since
+	 *     that relies on cache abuse.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < NR_LOCKDEP_CACHING_CLASSES; i++)
+		to->class_cache[i] = NULL;
+}
+
 /*
  * Every lock has a list of other locks that were taken after it.
  * We only grow the list, never remove from it: