diff options
author | Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> | 2013-02-06 18:04:53 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2013-02-06 18:04:53 -0800 |
commit | 60c057bca22285efefbba033624763a778f243bf (patch) | |
tree | 8e469c390b5b60ad6b4d7c94bc07522f857032bc /include/linux/workqueue.h | |
parent | 038366c5cf23ae737b9f72169dd8ade2d105755b (diff) | |
download | linux-60c057bca22285efefbba033624763a778f243bf.tar.gz linux-60c057bca22285efefbba033624763a778f243bf.tar.bz2 linux-60c057bca22285efefbba033624763a778f243bf.zip |
workqueue: add delayed_work->wq to simplify reentrancy handling
To avoid executing the same work item from multiple CPUs concurrently,
a work_struct records the last pool it was on in its ->data so that,
on the next queueing, the pool can be queried to determine whether the
work item is still executing or not.
A delayed_work goes through timer before actually being queued on the
target workqueue and the timer needs to know the target workqueue and
CPU. This is currently achieved by modifying delayed_work->work.data
such that it points to the cwq which points to the target workqueue
and the last CPU the work item was on. __queue_delayed_work()
extracts the last CPU from delayed_work->work.data and then combines
it with the target workqueue to create new work.data.
The only thing this rather ugly hack achieves is encoding the target
workqueue into delayed_work->work.data without using a separate field,
which could be a trade off one can make; unfortunately, this entangles
work->data management between regular workqueue and delayed_work code
by setting cwq pointer before the work item is actually queued and
becomes a hindrance for further improvements of work->data handling.
This can be easily made sane by adding a target workqueue field to
delayed_work. While delayed_work is used widely in the kernel and
this does make it a bit larger (<5%), I think this is the right
trade-off especially given the prospect of much saner handling of
work->data which currently involves quite tricky memory barrier
dancing, and don't expect to see any measureable effect.
Add delayed_work->wq and drop the delayed_work->work.data overloading.
tj: Rewrote the description.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux/workqueue.h')
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/workqueue.h | 3 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h index 426c39c2aaa4..a3d7556510c3 100644 --- a/include/linux/workqueue.h +++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h @@ -109,6 +109,9 @@ struct work_struct { struct delayed_work { struct work_struct work; struct timer_list timer; + + /* target workqueue and CPU ->timer uses to queue ->work */ + struct workqueue_struct *wq; int cpu; }; |