summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/bpf
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>2022-12-03 10:46:02 -0800
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2022-12-04 12:52:40 -0800
commitfca1aa75518c03b04c3c249e9a9134faf9ca18c5 (patch)
tree5981ba7fb846f4f58f1210a03cee3058bb86354c /kernel/bpf
parent706819495921ddad6b3780140b9d9e9293b6dedc (diff)
downloadlinux-fca1aa75518c03b04c3c249e9a9134faf9ca18c5.tar.gz
linux-fca1aa75518c03b04c3c249e9a9134faf9ca18c5.tar.bz2
linux-fca1aa75518c03b04c3c249e9a9134faf9ca18c5.zip
bpf: Handle MEM_RCU type properly
Commit 9bb00b2895cb ("bpf: Add kfunc bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock()") introduced MEM_RCU and bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock() support. In that commit, a rcu pointer is tagged with both MEM_RCU and PTR_TRUSTED so that it can be passed into kfuncs or helpers as an argument. Martin raised a good question in [1] such that the rcu pointer, although being able to accessing the object, might have reference count of 0. This might cause a problem if the rcu pointer is passed to a kfunc which expects trusted arguments where ref count should be greater than 0. This patch makes the following changes related to MEM_RCU pointer: - MEM_RCU pointer might be NULL (PTR_MAYBE_NULL). - Introduce KF_RCU so MEM_RCU ptr can be acquired with a KF_RCU tagged kfunc which assumes ref count of rcu ptr could be zero. - For mem access 'b = ptr->a', say 'ptr' is a MEM_RCU ptr, and 'a' is tagged with __rcu as well. Let us mark 'b' as MEM_RCU | PTR_MAYBE_NULL. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ac70f574-4023-664e-b711-e0d3b18117fd@linux.dev/ Fixes: 9bb00b2895cb ("bpf: Add kfunc bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock()") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221203184602.477272-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/helpers.c14
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/verifier.c45
2 files changed, 46 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index a5a511430f2a..cca642358e80 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -1838,6 +1838,19 @@ struct task_struct *bpf_task_acquire(struct task_struct *p)
}
/**
+ * bpf_task_acquire_not_zero - Acquire a reference to a rcu task object. A task
+ * acquired by this kfunc which is not stored in a map as a kptr, must be
+ * released by calling bpf_task_release().
+ * @p: The task on which a reference is being acquired.
+ */
+struct task_struct *bpf_task_acquire_not_zero(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&p->rcu_users))
+ return NULL;
+ return p;
+}
+
+/**
* bpf_task_kptr_get - Acquire a reference on a struct task_struct kptr. A task
* kptr acquired by this kfunc which is not subsequently stored in a map, must
* be released by calling bpf_task_release().
@@ -2013,6 +2026,7 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_push_back)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_pop_front, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_pop_back, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_task_acquire, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_task_acquire_not_zero, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RCU | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_task_kptr_get, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_KPTR_GET | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_task_release, KF_RELEASE)
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index b0db9c10567b..66b82f52b5bc 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -4275,7 +4275,7 @@ static bool is_trusted_reg(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
return true;
/* If a register is not referenced, it is trusted if it has the
- * MEM_ALLOC, MEM_RCU or PTR_TRUSTED type modifiers, and no others. Some of the
+ * MEM_ALLOC or PTR_TRUSTED type modifiers, and no others. Some of the
* other type modifiers may be safe, but we elect to take an opt-in
* approach here as some (e.g. PTR_UNTRUSTED and PTR_MAYBE_NULL) are
* not.
@@ -4287,6 +4287,11 @@ static bool is_trusted_reg(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
!bpf_type_has_unsafe_modifiers(reg->type);
}
+static bool is_rcu_reg(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
+{
+ return reg->type & MEM_RCU;
+}
+
static int check_pkt_ptr_alignment(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
const struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
int off, int size, bool strict)
@@ -4785,14 +4790,16 @@ static int check_ptr_to_btf_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
if (flag & MEM_RCU) {
/* Mark value register as MEM_RCU only if it is protected by
- * bpf_rcu_read_lock() and the ptr reg is trusted. MEM_RCU
+ * bpf_rcu_read_lock() and the ptr reg is rcu or trusted. MEM_RCU
* itself can already indicate trustedness inside the rcu
- * read lock region. Also mark it as PTR_TRUSTED.
+ * read lock region. Also mark rcu pointer as PTR_MAYBE_NULL since
+ * it could be null in some cases.
*/
- if (!env->cur_state->active_rcu_lock || !is_trusted_reg(reg))
+ if (!env->cur_state->active_rcu_lock ||
+ !(is_trusted_reg(reg) || is_rcu_reg(reg)))
flag &= ~MEM_RCU;
else
- flag |= PTR_TRUSTED;
+ flag |= PTR_MAYBE_NULL;
} else if (reg->type & MEM_RCU) {
/* ptr (reg) is marked as MEM_RCU, but the struct field is not tagged
* with __rcu. Mark the flag as PTR_UNTRUSTED conservatively.
@@ -5957,7 +5964,7 @@ static const struct bpf_reg_types btf_ptr_types = {
.types = {
PTR_TO_BTF_ID,
PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_TRUSTED,
- PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_RCU | PTR_TRUSTED,
+ PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_RCU,
},
};
static const struct bpf_reg_types percpu_btf_ptr_types = {
@@ -6136,7 +6143,7 @@ int check_func_arg_reg_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID:
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC:
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_TRUSTED:
- case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_RCU | PTR_TRUSTED:
+ case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_RCU:
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | PTR_TRUSTED:
/* When referenced PTR_TO_BTF_ID is passed to release function,
* it's fixed offset must be 0. In the other cases, fixed offset
@@ -8038,6 +8045,11 @@ static bool is_kfunc_destructive(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta)
return meta->kfunc_flags & KF_DESTRUCTIVE;
}
+static bool is_kfunc_rcu(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta)
+{
+ return meta->kfunc_flags & KF_RCU;
+}
+
static bool is_kfunc_arg_kptr_get(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta, int arg)
{
return arg == 0 && (meta->kfunc_flags & KF_KPTR_GET);
@@ -8722,13 +8734,20 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_
switch (kf_arg_type) {
case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_BTF_ID:
case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID:
- if (!is_kfunc_trusted_args(meta))
+ if (!is_kfunc_trusted_args(meta) && !is_kfunc_rcu(meta))
break;
if (!is_trusted_reg(reg)) {
- verbose(env, "R%d must be referenced or trusted\n", regno);
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (!is_kfunc_rcu(meta)) {
+ verbose(env, "R%d must be referenced or trusted\n", regno);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ if (!is_rcu_reg(reg)) {
+ verbose(env, "R%d must be a rcu pointer\n", regno);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
}
+
fallthrough;
case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_CTX:
/* Trusted arguments have the same offset checks as release arguments */
@@ -8839,7 +8858,7 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_
case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID:
/* Only base_type is checked, further checks are done here */
if ((base_type(reg->type) != PTR_TO_BTF_ID ||
- bpf_type_has_unsafe_modifiers(reg->type)) &&
+ (bpf_type_has_unsafe_modifiers(reg->type) && !is_rcu_reg(reg))) &&
!reg2btf_ids[base_type(reg->type)]) {
verbose(env, "arg#%d is %s ", i, reg_type_str(env, reg->type));
verbose(env, "expected %s or socket\n",
@@ -8954,7 +8973,7 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
} else if (rcu_unlock) {
bpf_for_each_reg_in_vstate(env->cur_state, state, reg, ({
if (reg->type & MEM_RCU) {
- reg->type &= ~(MEM_RCU | PTR_TRUSTED);
+ reg->type &= ~(MEM_RCU | PTR_MAYBE_NULL);
reg->type |= PTR_UNTRUSTED;
}
}));
@@ -11294,7 +11313,7 @@ static void mark_ptr_or_null_reg(struct bpf_func_state *state,
bool is_null)
{
if (type_may_be_null(reg->type) && reg->id == id &&
- !WARN_ON_ONCE(!reg->id)) {
+ (is_rcu_reg(reg) || !WARN_ON_ONCE(!reg->id))) {
/* Old offset (both fixed and variable parts) should have been
* known-zero, because we don't allow pointer arithmetic on
* pointers that might be NULL. If we see this happening, don't