diff options
author | Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> | 2010-03-15 10:10:19 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2010-04-02 20:12:02 +0200 |
commit | 30da688ef6b76e01969b00608202fff1eed2accc (patch) | |
tree | f4068cb8cf29f1d93d8489b162f41b7ac15a3d0c /kernel/cpu.c | |
parent | c1804d547dc098363443667609c272d1e4d15ee8 (diff) | |
download | linux-30da688ef6b76e01969b00608202fff1eed2accc.tar.gz linux-30da688ef6b76e01969b00608202fff1eed2accc.tar.bz2 linux-30da688ef6b76e01969b00608202fff1eed2accc.zip |
sched: sched_exec(): Remove the select_fallback_rq() logic
sched_exec()->select_task_rq() reads/updates ->cpus_allowed lockless.
This can race with other CPUs updating our ->cpus_allowed, and this
looks meaningless to me.
The task is current and running, it must have online cpus in ->cpus_allowed,
the fallback mode is bogus. And, if ->sched_class returns the "wrong" cpu,
this likely means we raced with set_cpus_allowed() which was called
for reason, why should sched_exec() retry and call ->select_task_rq()
again?
Change the code to call sched_class->select_task_rq() directly and do
nothing if the returned cpu is wrong after re-checking under rq->lock.
From now task_struct->cpus_allowed is always stable under TASK_WAKING,
select_fallback_rq() is always called under rq-lock or the caller or
the caller owns TASK_WAKING (select_task_rq).
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <20100315091019.GA9141@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/cpu.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions