diff options
author | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2011-11-21 12:32:23 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2011-11-21 12:32:23 -0800 |
commit | a5be2d0d1a8746e7be5210e3d6b904455000443c (patch) | |
tree | 1dcfa2725057a73059a3f768f5f5f7825b5d56ef /kernel/freezer.c | |
parent | 8a32c441c1609f80e55df75422324a1151208f40 (diff) | |
download | linux-a5be2d0d1a8746e7be5210e3d6b904455000443c.tar.gz linux-a5be2d0d1a8746e7be5210e3d6b904455000443c.tar.bz2 linux-a5be2d0d1a8746e7be5210e3d6b904455000443c.zip |
freezer: rename thaw_process() to __thaw_task() and simplify the implementation
thaw_process() now has only internal users - system and cgroup
freezers. Remove the unnecessary return value, rename, unexport and
collapse __thaw_process() into it. This will help further updates to
the freezer code.
-v3: oom_kill grew a use of thaw_process() while this patch was
pending. Convert it to use __thaw_task() for now. In the longer
term, this should be handled by allowing tasks to die if killed
even if it's frozen.
-v2: minor style update as suggested by Matt.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/freezer.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/freezer.c | 31 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/freezer.c b/kernel/freezer.c index b83c30e9483a..c851d588e29f 100644 --- a/kernel/freezer.c +++ b/kernel/freezer.c @@ -145,18 +145,8 @@ void cancel_freezing(struct task_struct *p) } } -static int __thaw_process(struct task_struct *p) -{ - if (frozen(p)) { - p->flags &= ~PF_FROZEN; - return 1; - } - clear_freeze_flag(p); - return 0; -} - /* - * Wake up a frozen process + * Wake up a frozen task * * task_lock() is needed to prevent the race with refrigerator() which may * occur if the freezing of tasks fails. Namely, without the lock, if the @@ -164,15 +154,18 @@ static int __thaw_process(struct task_struct *p) * refrigerator() could call frozen_process(), in which case the task would be * frozen and no one would thaw it. */ -int thaw_process(struct task_struct *p) +void __thaw_task(struct task_struct *p) { + bool was_frozen; + task_lock(p); - if (__thaw_process(p) == 1) { - task_unlock(p); - wake_up_process(p); - return 1; - } + was_frozen = frozen(p); + if (was_frozen) + p->flags &= ~PF_FROZEN; + else + clear_freeze_flag(p); task_unlock(p); - return 0; + + if (was_frozen) + wake_up_process(p); } -EXPORT_SYMBOL(thaw_process); |