Merge branch 'core-locking-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull core locking updates from Ingo Molnar:
 "The biggest change is the MCS spinlock generalization changes from Tim
  Chen, Peter Zijlstra, Jason Low et al.  There's also lockdep
  fixes/enhancements from Oleg Nesterov, in particular a false negative
  fix related to lockdep_set_novalidate_class() usage"

* 'core-locking-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (22 commits)
  locking/mutex: Fix debug checks
  locking/mutexes: Add extra reschedule point
  locking/mutexes: Introduce cancelable MCS lock for adaptive spinning
  locking/mutexes: Unlock the mutex without the wait_lock
  locking/mutexes: Modify the way optimistic spinners are queued
  locking/mutexes: Return false if task need_resched() in mutex_can_spin_on_owner()
  locking: Move mcs_spinlock.h into kernel/locking/
  m68k: Skip futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() test
  futex: Allow architectures to skip futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() test
  Revert "sched/wait: Suppress Sparse 'variable shadowing' warning"
  lockdep: Change lockdep_set_novalidate_class() to use _and_name
  lockdep: Change mark_held_locks() to check hlock->check instead of lockdep_no_validate
  lockdep: Don't create the wrong dependency on hlock->check == 0
  lockdep: Make held_lock->check and "int check" argument bool
  locking/mcs: Allow architecture specific asm files to be used for contended case
  locking/mcs: Order the header files in Kbuild of each architecture in alphabetical order
  sched/wait: Suppress Sparse 'variable shadowing' warning
  hung_task/Documentation: Fix hung_task_warnings description
  locking/mcs: Allow architectures to hook in to contended paths
  locking/mcs: Micro-optimize the MCS code, add extra comments
  ...

1 files changed, 178 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..838dc9e00669
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include "mcs_spinlock.h"
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+
+/*
+ * An MCS like lock especially tailored for optimistic spinning for sleeping
+ * lock implementations (mutex, rwsem, etc).
+ *
+ * Using a single mcs node per CPU is safe because sleeping locks should not be
+ * called from interrupt context and we have preemption disabled while
+ * spinning.
+ */
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct optimistic_spin_queue, osq_node);
+
+/*
+ * Get a stable @node->next pointer, either for unlock() or unqueue() purposes.
+ * Can return NULL in case we were the last queued and we updated @lock instead.
+ */
+static inline struct optimistic_spin_queue *
+osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock,
+	      struct optimistic_spin_queue *node,
+	      struct optimistic_spin_queue *prev)
+{
+	struct optimistic_spin_queue *next = NULL;
+
+	for (;;) {
+		if (*lock == node && cmpxchg(lock, node, prev) == node) {
+			/*
+			 * We were the last queued, we moved @lock back. @prev
+			 * will now observe @lock and will complete its
+			 * unlock()/unqueue().
+			 */
+			break;
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * We must xchg() the @node->next value, because if we were to
+		 * leave it in, a concurrent unlock()/unqueue() from
+		 * @node->next might complete Step-A and think its @prev is
+		 * still valid.
+		 *
+		 * If the concurrent unlock()/unqueue() wins the race, we'll
+		 * wait for either @lock to point to us, through its Step-B, or
+		 * wait for a new @node->next from its Step-C.
+		 */
+		if (node->next) {
+			next = xchg(&node->next, NULL);
+			if (next)
+				break;
+		}
+
+		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
+	}
+
+	return next;
+}
+
+bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock)
+{
+	struct optimistic_spin_queue *node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node);
+	struct optimistic_spin_queue *prev, *next;
+
+	node->locked = 0;
+	node->next = NULL;
+
+	node->prev = prev = xchg(lock, node);
+	if (likely(prev == NULL))
+		return true;
+
+	ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node;
+
+	/*
+	 * Normally @prev is untouchable after the above store; because at that
+	 * moment unlock can proceed and wipe the node element from stack.
+	 *
+	 * However, since our nodes are static per-cpu storage, we're
+	 * guaranteed their existence -- this allows us to apply
+	 * cmpxchg in an attempt to undo our queueing.
+	 */
+
+	while (!smp_load_acquire(&node->locked)) {
+		/*
+		 * If we need to reschedule bail... so we can block.
+		 */
+		if (need_resched())
+			goto unqueue;
+
+		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
+	}
+	return true;
+
+unqueue:
+	/*
+	 * Step - A  -- stabilize @prev
+	 *
+	 * Undo our @prev->next assignment; this will make @prev's
+	 * unlock()/unqueue() wait for a next pointer since @lock points to us
+	 * (or later).
+	 */
+
+	for (;;) {
+		if (prev->next == node &&
+		    cmpxchg(&prev->next, node, NULL) == node)
+			break;
+
+		/*
+		 * We can only fail the cmpxchg() racing against an unlock(),
+		 * in which case we should observe @node->locked becomming
+		 * true.
+		 */
+		if (smp_load_acquire(&node->locked))
+			return true;
+
+		arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
+
+		/*
+		 * Or we race against a concurrent unqueue()'s step-B, in which
+		 * case its step-C will write us a new @node->prev pointer.
+		 */
+		prev = ACCESS_ONCE(node->prev);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Step - B -- stabilize @next
+	 *
+	 * Similar to unlock(), wait for @node->next or move @lock from @node
+	 * back to @prev.
+	 */
+
+	next = osq_wait_next(lock, node, prev);
+	if (!next)
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * Step - C -- unlink
+	 *
+	 * @prev is stable because its still waiting for a new @prev->next
+	 * pointer, @next is stable because our @node->next pointer is NULL and
+	 * it will wait in Step-A.
+	 */
+
+	ACCESS_ONCE(next->prev) = prev;
+	ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = next;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+void osq_unlock(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock)
+{
+	struct optimistic_spin_queue *node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node);
+	struct optimistic_spin_queue *next;
+
+	/*
+	 * Fast path for the uncontended case.
+	 */
+	if (likely(cmpxchg(lock, node, NULL) == node))
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * Second most likely case.
+	 */
+	next = xchg(&node->next, NULL);
+	if (next) {
+		ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	next = osq_wait_next(lock, node, NULL);
+	if (next)
+		ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1;
+}
+
+#endif
+