diff options
| author | Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> | 2021-03-21 15:49:13 +0900 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2021-03-21 11:59:57 +0100 |
| commit | 3a85969e9d912d5dd85362ee37b5f81266e00e77 (patch) | |
| tree | 0bb38e8cb5f12eca0d6edf2ef9c0857bba2198ec /kernel/locking | |
| parent | 2dc0572f2cef87425147658698dce2600b799bd3 (diff) | |
| download | linux-3a85969e9d912d5dd85362ee37b5f81266e00e77.tar.gz linux-3a85969e9d912d5dd85362ee37b5f81266e00e77.tar.bz2 linux-3a85969e9d912d5dd85362ee37b5f81266e00e77.zip | |
lockdep: Add a missing initialization hint to the "INFO: Trying to register non-static key" message
Since this message is printed when dynamically allocated spinlocks (e.g.
kzalloc()) are used without initialization (e.g. spin_lock_init()),
suggest to developers to check whether initialization functions for objects
were called, before making developers wonder what annotation is missing.
[ mingo: Minor tweaks to the message. ]
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210321064913.4619-1-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/locking')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index c6d0c1dc6253..c30eb887ca7d 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -930,7 +930,8 @@ static bool assign_lock_key(struct lockdep_map *lock) /* Debug-check: all keys must be persistent! */ debug_locks_off(); pr_err("INFO: trying to register non-static key.\n"); - pr_err("the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.\n"); + pr_err("The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe\n"); + pr_err("you didn't initialize this object before use?\n"); pr_err("turning off the locking correctness validator.\n"); dump_stack(); return false; |