diff options
author | Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> | 2011-06-27 00:17:43 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> | 2011-09-28 21:38:22 -0700 |
commit | e4cc1f22b2f4e9b0207a8cdb63e56dcf99e82d35 (patch) | |
tree | ec3fad6587f0a83e764a571394bdfb85a84edf30 /kernel/rcutree.c | |
parent | d4c08f2ac311a360230eef7e5395b0ec8d8f0670 (diff) | |
download | linux-e4cc1f22b2f4e9b0207a8cdb63e56dcf99e82d35.tar.gz linux-e4cc1f22b2f4e9b0207a8cdb63e56dcf99e82d35.tar.bz2 linux-e4cc1f22b2f4e9b0207a8cdb63e56dcf99e82d35.zip |
rcu: Simplify quiescent-state accounting
There is often a delay between the time that a CPU passes through a
quiescent state and the time that this quiescent state is reported to the
RCU core. It is quite possible that the grace period ended before the
quiescent state could be reported, for example, some other CPU might have
deduced that this CPU passed through dyntick-idle mode. It is critically
important that quiescent state be counted only against the grace period
that was in effect at the time that the quiescent state was detected.
Previously, this was handled by recording the number of the last grace
period to complete when passing through a quiescent state. The RCU
core then checks this number against the current value, and rejects
the quiescent state if there is a mismatch. However, one additional
possibility must be accounted for, namely that the quiescent state was
recorded after the prior grace period completed but before the current
grace period started. In this case, the RCU core must reject the
quiescent state, but the recorded number will match. This is handled
when the CPU becomes aware of a new grace period -- at that point,
it invalidates any prior quiescent state.
This works, but is a bit indirect. The new approach records the current
grace period, and the RCU core checks to see (1) that this is still the
current grace period and (2) that this grace period has not yet ended.
This approach simplifies reasoning about correctness, and this commit
changes over to this new approach.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/rcutree.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/rcutree.c | 44 |
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c index 7e0282949f8a..7e2f297aeec8 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree.c +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c @@ -159,32 +159,34 @@ static int rcu_gp_in_progress(struct rcu_state *rsp) * Note a quiescent state. Because we do not need to know * how many quiescent states passed, just if there was at least * one since the start of the grace period, this just sets a flag. + * The caller must have disabled preemption. */ void rcu_sched_qs(int cpu) { struct rcu_data *rdp = &per_cpu(rcu_sched_data, cpu); - rdp->passed_quiesc_completed = rdp->gpnum - 1; + rdp->passed_quiesce_gpnum = rdp->gpnum; barrier(); - if (rdp->passed_quiesc == 0) + if (rdp->passed_quiesce == 0) trace_rcu_grace_period("rcu_sched", rdp->gpnum, "cpuqs"); - rdp->passed_quiesc = 1; + rdp->passed_quiesce = 1; } void rcu_bh_qs(int cpu) { struct rcu_data *rdp = &per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu); - rdp->passed_quiesc_completed = rdp->gpnum - 1; + rdp->passed_quiesce_gpnum = rdp->gpnum; barrier(); - if (rdp->passed_quiesc == 0) + if (rdp->passed_quiesce == 0) trace_rcu_grace_period("rcu_bh", rdp->gpnum, "cpuqs"); - rdp->passed_quiesc = 1; + rdp->passed_quiesce = 1; } /* * Note a context switch. This is a quiescent state for RCU-sched, * and requires special handling for preemptible RCU. + * The caller must have disabled preemption. */ void rcu_note_context_switch(int cpu) { @@ -694,7 +696,7 @@ static void __note_new_gpnum(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp, struct trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rdp->gpnum, "cpustart"); if (rnp->qsmask & rdp->grpmask) { rdp->qs_pending = 1; - rdp->passed_quiesc = 0; + rdp->passed_quiesce = 0; } else rdp->qs_pending = 0; } @@ -1027,7 +1029,7 @@ rcu_report_qs_rnp(unsigned long mask, struct rcu_state *rsp, * based on quiescent states detected in an earlier grace period! */ static void -rcu_report_qs_rdp(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp, long lastcomp) +rcu_report_qs_rdp(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp, long lastgp) { unsigned long flags; unsigned long mask; @@ -1035,17 +1037,15 @@ rcu_report_qs_rdp(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp, long las rnp = rdp->mynode; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags); - if (lastcomp != rnp->completed) { + if (lastgp != rnp->gpnum || rnp->completed == rnp->gpnum) { /* - * Someone beat us to it for this grace period, so leave. - * The race with GP start is resolved by the fact that we - * hold the leaf rcu_node lock, so that the per-CPU bits - * cannot yet be initialized -- so we would simply find our - * CPU's bit already cleared in rcu_report_qs_rnp() if this - * race occurred. + * The grace period in which this quiescent state was + * recorded has ended, so don't report it upwards. + * We will instead need a new quiescent state that lies + * within the current grace period. */ - rdp->passed_quiesc = 0; /* try again later! */ + rdp->passed_quiesce = 0; /* need qs for new gp. */ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags); return; } @@ -1089,14 +1089,14 @@ rcu_check_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp) * Was there a quiescent state since the beginning of the grace * period? If no, then exit and wait for the next call. */ - if (!rdp->passed_quiesc) + if (!rdp->passed_quiesce) return; /* * Tell RCU we are done (but rcu_report_qs_rdp() will be the * judge of that). */ - rcu_report_qs_rdp(rdp->cpu, rsp, rdp, rdp->passed_quiesc_completed); + rcu_report_qs_rdp(rdp->cpu, rsp, rdp, rdp->passed_quiesce_gpnum); } #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU @@ -1712,7 +1712,7 @@ static int __rcu_pending(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp) check_cpu_stall(rsp, rdp); /* Is the RCU core waiting for a quiescent state from this CPU? */ - if (rdp->qs_pending && !rdp->passed_quiesc) { + if (rdp->qs_pending && !rdp->passed_quiesce) { /* * If force_quiescent_state() coming soon and this CPU @@ -1724,7 +1724,7 @@ static int __rcu_pending(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp) ULONG_CMP_LT(ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->jiffies_force_qs) - 1, jiffies)) set_need_resched(); - } else if (rdp->qs_pending && rdp->passed_quiesc) { + } else if (rdp->qs_pending && rdp->passed_quiesce) { rdp->n_rp_report_qs++; return 1; } @@ -1907,7 +1907,7 @@ rcu_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp, int preemptible) /* Set up local state, ensuring consistent view of global state. */ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags); - rdp->passed_quiesc = 0; /* We could be racing with new GP, */ + rdp->passed_quiesce = 0; /* We could be racing with new GP, */ rdp->qs_pending = 1; /* so set up to respond to current GP. */ rdp->beenonline = 1; /* We have now been online. */ rdp->preemptible = preemptible; @@ -1935,7 +1935,7 @@ rcu_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp, int preemptible) if (rnp == rdp->mynode) { rdp->gpnum = rnp->completed; /* if GP in progress... */ rdp->completed = rnp->completed; - rdp->passed_quiesc_completed = rnp->completed - 1; + rdp->passed_quiesce_gpnum = rnp->gpnum - 1; trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rdp->gpnum, "cpuonl"); } raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */ |