diff options
author | Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> | 2009-12-02 12:10:15 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2009-12-03 11:35:25 +0100 |
commit | d9a3da0699b24a589b27a61e1a5b5bd30d9db669 (patch) | |
tree | f7440e396a6c818f3cef514ccc31ab55d88025ef /kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | |
parent | cf244dc01bf68e1ad338b82447f8686d24ea4435 (diff) | |
download | linux-d9a3da0699b24a589b27a61e1a5b5bd30d9db669.tar.gz linux-d9a3da0699b24a589b27a61e1a5b5bd30d9db669.tar.bz2 linux-d9a3da0699b24a589b27a61e1a5b5bd30d9db669.zip |
rcu: Add expedited grace-period support for preemptible RCU
Implement an synchronize_rcu_expedited() for preemptible RCU
that actually is expedited. This uses
synchronize_sched_expedited() to force all threads currently
running in a preemptible-RCU read-side critical section onto the
appropriate ->blocked_tasks[] list, then takes a snapshot of all
of these lists and waits for them to drain.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca
Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org
Cc: dvhltc@us.ibm.com
Cc: niv@us.ibm.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com
LKML-Reference: <1259784616158-git-send-email->
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/rcutree_plugin.h')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 198 |
1 files changed, 189 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h index c9f0c975c003..37fbccdf41d5 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h @@ -24,12 +24,15 @@ * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> */ +#include <linux/delay.h> #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU struct rcu_state rcu_preempt_state = RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(rcu_preempt_state); DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_preempt_data); +static int rcu_preempted_readers_exp(struct rcu_node *rnp); + /* * Tell them what RCU they are running. */ @@ -157,7 +160,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rcu_read_lock); */ static int rcu_preempted_readers(struct rcu_node *rnp) { - return !list_empty(&rnp->blocked_tasks[rnp->gpnum & 0x1]); + int phase = rnp->gpnum & 0x1; + + return !list_empty(&rnp->blocked_tasks[phase]) || + !list_empty(&rnp->blocked_tasks[phase + 2]); } /* @@ -204,6 +210,7 @@ static void rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp, unsigned long flags) static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t) { int empty; + int empty_exp; unsigned long flags; struct rcu_node *rnp; int special; @@ -247,6 +254,8 @@ static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t) spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */ } empty = !rcu_preempted_readers(rnp); + empty_exp = !rcu_preempted_readers_exp(rnp); + smp_mb(); /* ensure expedited fastpath sees end of RCU c-s. */ list_del_init(&t->rcu_node_entry); t->rcu_blocked_node = NULL; @@ -259,6 +268,13 @@ static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t) spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags); else rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp(rnp, flags); + + /* + * If this was the last task on the expedited lists, + * then we need to report up the rcu_node hierarchy. + */ + if (!empty_exp && !rcu_preempted_readers_exp(rnp)) + rcu_report_exp_rnp(&rcu_preempt_state, rnp); } else { local_irq_restore(flags); } @@ -343,7 +359,7 @@ static int rcu_preempt_offline_tasks(struct rcu_state *rsp, int i; struct list_head *lp; struct list_head *lp_root; - int retval; + int retval = 0; struct rcu_node *rnp_root = rcu_get_root(rsp); struct task_struct *tp; @@ -353,7 +369,9 @@ static int rcu_preempt_offline_tasks(struct rcu_state *rsp, } WARN_ON_ONCE(rnp != rdp->mynode && (!list_empty(&rnp->blocked_tasks[0]) || - !list_empty(&rnp->blocked_tasks[1]))); + !list_empty(&rnp->blocked_tasks[1]) || + !list_empty(&rnp->blocked_tasks[2]) || + !list_empty(&rnp->blocked_tasks[3]))); /* * Move tasks up to root rcu_node. Rely on the fact that the @@ -361,8 +379,11 @@ static int rcu_preempt_offline_tasks(struct rcu_state *rsp, * rcu_nodes in terms of gp_num value. This fact allows us to * move the blocked_tasks[] array directly, element by element. */ - retval = rcu_preempted_readers(rnp); - for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { + if (rcu_preempted_readers(rnp)) + retval |= RCU_OFL_TASKS_NORM_GP; + if (rcu_preempted_readers_exp(rnp)) + retval |= RCU_OFL_TASKS_EXP_GP; + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) { lp = &rnp->blocked_tasks[i]; lp_root = &rnp_root->blocked_tasks[i]; while (!list_empty(lp)) { @@ -449,14 +470,159 @@ void synchronize_rcu(void) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu); +static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_wq); +static long sync_rcu_preempt_exp_count; +static DEFINE_MUTEX(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex); + +/* + * Return non-zero if there are any tasks in RCU read-side critical + * sections blocking the current preemptible-RCU expedited grace period. + * If there is no preemptible-RCU expedited grace period currently in + * progress, returns zero unconditionally. + */ +static int rcu_preempted_readers_exp(struct rcu_node *rnp) +{ + return !list_empty(&rnp->blocked_tasks[2]) || + !list_empty(&rnp->blocked_tasks[3]); +} + +/* + * return non-zero if there is no RCU expedited grace period in progress + * for the specified rcu_node structure, in other words, if all CPUs and + * tasks covered by the specified rcu_node structure have done their bit + * for the current expedited grace period. Works only for preemptible + * RCU -- other RCU implementation use other means. + * + * Caller must hold sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex. + */ +static int sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(struct rcu_node *rnp) +{ + return !rcu_preempted_readers_exp(rnp) && + ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->expmask) == 0; +} + +/* + * Report the exit from RCU read-side critical section for the last task + * that queued itself during or before the current expedited preemptible-RCU + * grace period. This event is reported either to the rcu_node structure on + * which the task was queued or to one of that rcu_node structure's ancestors, + * recursively up the tree. (Calm down, calm down, we do the recursion + * iteratively!) + * + * Caller must hold sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex. + */ +static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp) +{ + unsigned long flags; + unsigned long mask; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags); + for (;;) { + if (!sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(rnp)) + break; + if (rnp->parent == NULL) { + wake_up(&sync_rcu_preempt_exp_wq); + break; + } + mask = rnp->grpmask; + spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled */ + rnp = rnp->parent; + spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled */ + rnp->expmask &= ~mask; + } + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags); +} + +/* + * Snapshot the tasks blocking the newly started preemptible-RCU expedited + * grace period for the specified rcu_node structure. If there are no such + * tasks, report it up the rcu_node hierarchy. + * + * Caller must hold sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex and rsp->onofflock. + */ +static void +sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp) +{ + int must_wait; + + spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled */ + list_splice_init(&rnp->blocked_tasks[0], &rnp->blocked_tasks[2]); + list_splice_init(&rnp->blocked_tasks[1], &rnp->blocked_tasks[3]); + must_wait = rcu_preempted_readers_exp(rnp); + spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled */ + if (!must_wait) + rcu_report_exp_rnp(rsp, rnp); +} + /* - * Wait for an rcu-preempt grace period. We are supposed to expedite the - * grace period, but this is the crude slow compatability hack, so just - * invoke synchronize_rcu(). + * Wait for an rcu-preempt grace period, but expedite it. The basic idea + * is to invoke synchronize_sched_expedited() to push all the tasks to + * the ->blocked_tasks[] lists, move all entries from the first set of + * ->blocked_tasks[] lists to the second set, and finally wait for this + * second set to drain. */ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void) { - synchronize_rcu(); + unsigned long flags; + struct rcu_node *rnp; + struct rcu_state *rsp = &rcu_preempt_state; + long snap; + int trycount = 0; + + smp_mb(); /* Caller's modifications seen first by other CPUs. */ + snap = ACCESS_ONCE(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_count) + 1; + smp_mb(); /* Above access cannot bleed into critical section. */ + + /* + * Acquire lock, falling back to synchronize_rcu() if too many + * lock-acquisition failures. Of course, if someone does the + * expedited grace period for us, just leave. + */ + while (!mutex_trylock(&sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex)) { + if (trycount++ < 10) + udelay(trycount * num_online_cpus()); + else { + synchronize_rcu(); + return; + } + if ((ACCESS_ONCE(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_count) - snap) > 0) + goto mb_ret; /* Others did our work for us. */ + } + if ((ACCESS_ONCE(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_count) - snap) > 0) + goto unlock_mb_ret; /* Others did our work for us. */ + + /* force all RCU readers onto blocked_tasks[]. */ + synchronize_sched_expedited(); + + spin_lock_irqsave(&rsp->onofflock, flags); + + /* Initialize ->expmask for all non-leaf rcu_node structures. */ + rcu_for_each_nonleaf_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) { + spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */ + rnp->expmask = rnp->qsmaskinit; + spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */ + } + + /* Snapshot current state of ->blocked_tasks[] lists. */ + rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rsp, rnp) + sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init(rsp, rnp); + if (NUM_RCU_NODES > 1) + sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init(rsp, rcu_get_root(rsp)); + + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rsp->onofflock, flags); + + /* Wait for snapshotted ->blocked_tasks[] lists to drain. */ + rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp); + wait_event(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_wq, + sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(rnp)); + + /* Clean up and exit. */ + smp_mb(); /* ensure expedited GP seen before counter increment. */ + ACCESS_ONCE(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_count)++; +unlock_mb_ret: + mutex_unlock(&sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex); +mb_ret: + smp_mb(); /* ensure subsequent action seen after grace period. */ } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu_expedited); @@ -655,6 +821,20 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu_expedited); +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU + +/* + * Because preemptable RCU does not exist, there is never any need to + * report on tasks preempted in RCU read-side critical sections during + * expedited RCU grace periods. + */ +static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp) +{ + return; +} + +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */ + /* * Because preemptable RCU does not exist, it never has any work to do. */ |