diff options
author | Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> | 2012-01-30 17:02:47 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> | 2012-02-21 09:06:07 -0800 |
commit | 2036d94a7b61ca5032ce90f2bda06afec0fe713e (patch) | |
tree | fc9f4b5ba1058e5a2fdf9ccd187766c90f5ae036 /kernel/rcutree_trace.c | |
parent | c5fdcec927ee31fc96e92339c3a83ac6e0725289 (diff) | |
download | linux-2036d94a7b61ca5032ce90f2bda06afec0fe713e.tar.gz linux-2036d94a7b61ca5032ce90f2bda06afec0fe713e.tar.bz2 linux-2036d94a7b61ca5032ce90f2bda06afec0fe713e.zip |
rcu: Rework detection of use of RCU by offline CPUs
Because newly offlined CPUs continue executing after completing the
CPU_DYING notifiers, they legitimately enter the scheduler and use
RCU while appearing to be offline. This calls for a more sophisticated
approach as follows:
1. RCU marks the CPU online during the CPU_UP_PREPARE phase.
2. RCU marks the CPU offline during the CPU_DEAD phase.
3. Diagnostics regarding use of read-side RCU by offline CPUs use
RCU's accounting rather than the cpu_online_map. (Note that
__call_rcu() still uses cpu_online_map to detect illegal
invocations within CPU_DYING notifiers.)
4. Offline CPUs are prevented from hanging the system by
force_quiescent_state(), which pays attention to cpu_online_map.
Some additional work (in a later commit) will be needed to
guarantee that force_quiescent_state() waits a full jiffy before
assuming that a CPU is offline, for example, when called from
idle entry. (This commit also makes the one-jiffy wait
explicit, since the old-style implicit wait can now be defeated
by RCU_FAST_NO_HZ and by rcutorture.)
This approach avoids the false positives encountered when attempting to
use more exact classification of CPU online/offline state.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/rcutree_trace.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/rcutree_trace.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c index db0987c1e1bd..ed459edeff43 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c +++ b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static void print_one_rcu_data(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp) rdp->dynticks->dynticks_nesting, rdp->dynticks->dynticks_nmi_nesting, rdp->dynticks_fqs); - seq_printf(m, " of=%lu ri=%lu", rdp->offline_fqs, rdp->resched_ipi); + seq_printf(m, " of=%lu", rdp->offline_fqs); seq_printf(m, " ql=%ld/%ld qs=%c%c%c%c", rdp->qlen_lazy, rdp->qlen, ".N"[rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL] != @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static void print_one_rcu_data_csv(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp) rdp->dynticks->dynticks_nesting, rdp->dynticks->dynticks_nmi_nesting, rdp->dynticks_fqs); - seq_printf(m, ",%lu,%lu", rdp->offline_fqs, rdp->resched_ipi); + seq_printf(m, ",%lu", rdp->offline_fqs); seq_printf(m, ",%ld,%ld,\"%c%c%c%c\"", rdp->qlen_lazy, rdp->qlen, ".N"[rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL] != rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL]], @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static int show_rcudata_csv(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) { seq_puts(m, "\"CPU\",\"Online?\",\"c\",\"g\",\"pq\",\"pgp\",\"pq\","); seq_puts(m, "\"dt\",\"dt nesting\",\"dt NMI nesting\",\"df\","); - seq_puts(m, "\"of\",\"ri\",\"qll\",\"ql\",\"qs\""); + seq_puts(m, "\"of\",\"qll\",\"ql\",\"qs\""); #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST seq_puts(m, "\"kt\",\"ktl\""); #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */ |