summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/sched_rt.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2008-04-19 12:11:10 +0200
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2009-08-02 15:15:51 +0200
commitbcf08df3b23b3d13bf8c4ad6bd744a6ad30015fb (patch)
treec3c37cfa34a15c05a37bbacc7b67a2ffc19bc856 /kernel/sched_rt.c
parent693525e3bea25cf2ee6cf2b862ba7c148e891df2 (diff)
downloadlinux-bcf08df3b23b3d13bf8c4ad6bd744a6ad30015fb.tar.gz
linux-bcf08df3b23b3d13bf8c4ad6bd744a6ad30015fb.tar.bz2
linux-bcf08df3b23b3d13bf8c4ad6bd744a6ad30015fb.zip
sched: Fix cpupri build on !CONFIG_SMP
This build bug: In file included from kernel/sched.c:1765: kernel/sched_rt.c: In function ‘has_pushable_tasks’: kernel/sched_rt.c:1069: error: ‘struct rt_rq’ has no member named ‘pushable_tasks’ kernel/sched_rt.c: In function ‘pick_next_task_rt’: kernel/sched_rt.c:1084: error: ‘struct rq’ has no member named ‘post_schedule’ Triggers because both pushable_tasks and post_schedule are SMP-only fields. Move pushable_tasks() to the SMP section and #ifdef the post_schedule use. Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <20090729150422.17691.55590.stgit@dev.haskins.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched_rt.c')
-rw-r--r--kernel/sched_rt.c12
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
index f365e66b3d49..3d4020a9ba1b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -136,6 +136,11 @@ static void dequeue_pushable_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
plist_del(&p->pushable_tasks, &rq->rt.pushable_tasks);
}
+static inline int has_pushable_tasks(struct rq *rq)
+{
+ return !plist_head_empty(&rq->rt.pushable_tasks);
+}
+
#else
static inline void enqueue_pushable_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
@@ -1064,11 +1069,6 @@ static struct task_struct *_pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
return p;
}
-static inline int has_pushable_tasks(struct rq *rq)
-{
- return !plist_head_empty(&rq->rt.pushable_tasks);
-}
-
static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
{
struct task_struct *p = _pick_next_task_rt(rq);
@@ -1077,11 +1077,13 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
if (p)
dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* We detect this state here so that we can avoid taking the RQ
* lock again later if there is no need to push
*/
rq->post_schedule = has_pushable_tasks(rq);
+#endif
return p;
}