summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/workqueue.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>2013-04-01 11:23:38 -0700
committerTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>2013-04-01 11:23:38 -0700
commitd55262c4d164759a8debe772da6c9b16059dec47 (patch)
tree2dffae0287567802a05e3290048195ea277d22ae /kernel/workqueue.c
parent4c16bd327c74d6678858706211a0c6e4e53eb3e6 (diff)
downloadlinux-d55262c4d164759a8debe772da6c9b16059dec47.tar.gz
linux-d55262c4d164759a8debe772da6c9b16059dec47.tar.bz2
linux-d55262c4d164759a8debe772da6c9b16059dec47.zip
workqueue: update sysfs interface to reflect NUMA awareness and a kernel param to disable NUMA affinity
Unbound workqueues are now NUMA aware. Let's add some control knobs and update sysfs interface accordingly. * Add kernel param workqueue.numa_disable which disables NUMA affinity globally. * Replace sysfs file "pool_id" with "pool_ids" which contain node:pool_id pairs. This change is userland-visible but "pool_id" hasn't seen a release yet, so this is okay. * Add a new sysf files "numa" which can toggle NUMA affinity on individual workqueues. This is implemented as attrs->no_numa whichn is special in that it isn't part of a pool's attributes. It only affects how apply_workqueue_attrs() picks which pools to use. After "pool_ids" change, first_pwq() doesn't have any user left. Removed. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/workqueue.c')
-rw-r--r--kernel/workqueue.c82
1 files changed, 59 insertions, 23 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 57cd77de4a4f..729ac6a44860 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -268,6 +268,9 @@ static int wq_numa_tbl_len; /* highest possible NUMA node id + 1 */
static cpumask_var_t *wq_numa_possible_cpumask;
/* possible CPUs of each node */
+static bool wq_disable_numa;
+module_param_named(disable_numa, wq_disable_numa, bool, 0444);
+
static bool wq_numa_enabled; /* unbound NUMA affinity enabled */
/* buf for wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs(), protected by CPU hotplug exclusion */
@@ -517,21 +520,6 @@ static int worker_pool_assign_id(struct worker_pool *pool)
}
/**
- * first_pwq - return the first pool_workqueue of the specified workqueue
- * @wq: the target workqueue
- *
- * This must be called either with wq->mutex held or sched RCU read locked.
- * If the pwq needs to be used beyond the locking in effect, the caller is
- * responsible for guaranteeing that the pwq stays online.
- */
-static struct pool_workqueue *first_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
-{
- assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex(wq);
- return list_first_or_null_rcu(&wq->pwqs, struct pool_workqueue,
- pwqs_node);
-}
-
-/**
* unbound_pwq_by_node - return the unbound pool_workqueue for the given node
* @wq: the target workqueue
* @node: the node ID
@@ -3114,16 +3102,21 @@ static struct device_attribute wq_sysfs_attrs[] = {
__ATTR_NULL,
};
-static ssize_t wq_pool_id_show(struct device *dev,
- struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+static ssize_t wq_pool_ids_show(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
struct workqueue_struct *wq = dev_to_wq(dev);
- struct worker_pool *pool;
- int written;
+ const char *delim = "";
+ int node, written = 0;
rcu_read_lock_sched();
- pool = first_pwq(wq)->pool;
- written = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", pool->id);
+ for_each_node(node) {
+ written += scnprintf(buf + written, PAGE_SIZE - written,
+ "%s%d:%d", delim, node,
+ unbound_pwq_by_node(wq, node)->pool->id);
+ delim = " ";
+ }
+ written += scnprintf(buf + written, PAGE_SIZE - written, "\n");
rcu_read_unlock_sched();
return written;
@@ -3212,10 +3205,46 @@ static ssize_t wq_cpumask_store(struct device *dev,
return ret ?: count;
}
+static ssize_t wq_numa_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
+ char *buf)
+{
+ struct workqueue_struct *wq = dev_to_wq(dev);
+ int written;
+
+ mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
+ written = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n",
+ !wq->unbound_attrs->no_numa);
+ mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
+
+ return written;
+}
+
+static ssize_t wq_numa_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
+ const char *buf, size_t count)
+{
+ struct workqueue_struct *wq = dev_to_wq(dev);
+ struct workqueue_attrs *attrs;
+ int v, ret;
+
+ attrs = wq_sysfs_prep_attrs(wq);
+ if (!attrs)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ if (sscanf(buf, "%d", &v) == 1) {
+ attrs->no_numa = !v;
+ ret = apply_workqueue_attrs(wq, attrs);
+ }
+
+ free_workqueue_attrs(attrs);
+ return ret ?: count;
+}
+
static struct device_attribute wq_sysfs_unbound_attrs[] = {
- __ATTR(pool_id, 0444, wq_pool_id_show, NULL),
+ __ATTR(pool_ids, 0444, wq_pool_ids_show, NULL),
__ATTR(nice, 0644, wq_nice_show, wq_nice_store),
__ATTR(cpumask, 0644, wq_cpumask_show, wq_cpumask_store),
+ __ATTR(numa, 0644, wq_numa_show, wq_numa_store),
__ATTR_NULL,
};
@@ -3750,7 +3779,7 @@ static void free_unbound_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
static bool wq_calc_node_cpumask(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs, int node,
int cpu_going_down, cpumask_t *cpumask)
{
- if (!wq_numa_enabled)
+ if (!wq_numa_enabled || attrs->no_numa)
goto use_dfl;
/* does @node have any online CPUs @attrs wants? */
@@ -3951,6 +3980,8 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu,
cpumask = target_attrs->cpumask;
mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
+ if (wq->unbound_attrs->no_numa)
+ goto out_unlock;
copy_workqueue_attrs(target_attrs, wq->unbound_attrs);
pwq = unbound_pwq_by_node(wq, node);
@@ -4763,6 +4794,11 @@ static void __init wq_numa_init(void)
if (num_possible_nodes() <= 1)
return;
+ if (wq_disable_numa) {
+ pr_info("workqueue: NUMA affinity support disabled\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf = alloc_workqueue_attrs(GFP_KERNEL);
BUG_ON(!wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf);