diff options
| author | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2017-03-04 10:27:18 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> | 2017-03-14 21:45:36 +0100 |
| commit | c236c8e95a3d395b0494e7108f0d41cf36ec107c (patch) | |
| tree | 25c0e83f3b4458fb2982a8470876f99adce29cfe /kernel | |
| parent | 4495c08e84729385774601b5146d51d9e5849f81 (diff) | |
| download | linux-c236c8e95a3d395b0494e7108f0d41cf36ec107c.tar.gz linux-c236c8e95a3d395b0494e7108f0d41cf36ec107c.tar.bz2 linux-c236c8e95a3d395b0494e7108f0d41cf36ec107c.zip | |
futex: Fix potential use-after-free in FUTEX_REQUEUE_PI
While working on the futex code, I stumbled over this potential
use-after-free scenario. Dmitry triggered it later with syzkaller.
pi_mutex is a pointer into pi_state, which we drop the reference on in
unqueue_me_pi(). So any access to that pointer after that is bad.
Since other sites already do rt_mutex_unlock() with hb->lock held, see
for example futex_lock_pi(), simply move the unlock before
unqueue_me_pi().
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: juri.lelli@arm.com
Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de
Cc: xlpang@redhat.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
Cc: jdesfossez@efficios.com
Cc: dvhart@infradead.org
Cc: bristot@redhat.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170304093558.801744246@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/futex.c | 20 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c index 229a744b1781..3a4775fd7468 100644 --- a/kernel/futex.c +++ b/kernel/futex.c @@ -2815,7 +2815,6 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, { struct hrtimer_sleeper timeout, *to = NULL; struct rt_mutex_waiter rt_waiter; - struct rt_mutex *pi_mutex = NULL; struct futex_hash_bucket *hb; union futex_key key2 = FUTEX_KEY_INIT; struct futex_q q = futex_q_init; @@ -2907,6 +2906,8 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr); } } else { + struct rt_mutex *pi_mutex; + /* * We have been woken up by futex_unlock_pi(), a timeout, or a * signal. futex_unlock_pi() will not destroy the lock_ptr nor @@ -2930,18 +2931,19 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, if (res) ret = (res < 0) ? res : 0; + /* + * If fixup_pi_state_owner() faulted and was unable to handle + * the fault, unlock the rt_mutex and return the fault to + * userspace. + */ + if (ret && rt_mutex_owner(pi_mutex) == current) + rt_mutex_unlock(pi_mutex); + /* Unqueue and drop the lock. */ unqueue_me_pi(&q); } - /* - * If fixup_pi_state_owner() faulted and was unable to handle the - * fault, unlock the rt_mutex and return the fault to userspace. - */ - if (ret == -EFAULT) { - if (pi_mutex && rt_mutex_owner(pi_mutex) == current) - rt_mutex_unlock(pi_mutex); - } else if (ret == -EINTR) { + if (ret == -EINTR) { /* * We've already been requeued, but cannot restart by calling * futex_lock_pi() directly. We could restart this syscall, but |