summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>2021-04-30 16:21:46 +0200
committerDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>2021-05-03 11:56:16 +0200
commitb9b34ddbe2076ade359cd5ce7537d5ed019e9807 (patch)
tree49fcb2249efc10349d019d367f66d41274edf448 /kernel
parentf80f88f0e2f2ef9cd805fad1bbf676b0ecd4b55c (diff)
downloadlinux-b9b34ddbe2076ade359cd5ce7537d5ed019e9807.tar.gz
linux-b9b34ddbe2076ade359cd5ce7537d5ed019e9807.tar.bz2
linux-b9b34ddbe2076ade359cd5ce7537d5ed019e9807.zip
bpf: Fix masking negation logic upon negative dst register
The negation logic for the case where the off_reg is sitting in the dst register is not correct given then we cannot just invert the add to a sub or vice versa. As a fix, perform the final bitwise and-op unconditionally into AX from the off_reg, then move the pointer from the src to dst and finally use AX as the source for the original pointer arithmetic operation such that the inversion yields a correct result. The single non-AX mov in between is possible given constant blinding is retaining it as it's not an immediate based operation. Fixes: 979d63d50c0c ("bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on pointer arithmetic") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Tested-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/verifier.c12
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 8fd552c16763..db347fb125e3 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -12391,14 +12391,10 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
*patch++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_AX, off_reg);
*patch++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_AX, 0);
*patch++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_AX, 63);
- if (issrc) {
- *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_AX,
- off_reg);
- insn->src_reg = BPF_REG_AX;
- } else {
- *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, off_reg,
- BPF_REG_AX);
- }
+ *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_AX, off_reg);
+ if (!issrc)
+ *patch++ = BPF_MOV64_REG(insn->dst_reg, insn->src_reg);
+ insn->src_reg = BPF_REG_AX;
if (isneg)
insn->code = insn->code == code_add ?
code_sub : code_add;