diff options
author | Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com> | 2023-09-29 17:09:30 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2023-10-09 09:48:33 +0200 |
commit | b01db23d5923a35023540edc4f0c5f019e11ac7d (patch) | |
tree | d6fd6bedd01a4137f41f4b54cb810022dae1af07 /kernel | |
parent | 8dafa9d0eb1a1550a0f4d462db9354161bc51e0c (diff) | |
download | linux-b01db23d5923a35023540edc4f0c5f019e11ac7d.tar.gz linux-b01db23d5923a35023540edc4f0c5f019e11ac7d.tar.bz2 linux-b01db23d5923a35023540edc4f0c5f019e11ac7d.zip |
sched/eevdf: Fix pick_eevdf()
The old pick_eevdf() could fail to find the actual earliest eligible
deadline when it descended to the right looking for min_deadline, but
it turned out that that min_deadline wasn't actually eligible. In that
case we need to go back and search through any left branches we
skipped looking for the actual best _eligible_ min_deadline.
This is more expensive, but still O(log n), and at worst should only
involve descending two branches of the rbtree.
I've run this through a userspace stress test (thank you
tools/lib/rbtree.c), so hopefully this implementation doesn't miss any
corner cases.
Fixes: 147f3efaa241 ("sched/fair: Implement an EEVDF-like scheduling policy")
Signed-off-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/xm261qego72d.fsf_-_@google.com
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/fair.c | 72 |
1 files changed, 58 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index a4b904a010c6..061a30a8925a 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -872,14 +872,16 @@ struct sched_entity *__pick_first_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) * * Which allows an EDF like search on (sub)trees. */ -static struct sched_entity *pick_eevdf(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) +static struct sched_entity *__pick_eevdf(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { struct rb_node *node = cfs_rq->tasks_timeline.rb_root.rb_node; struct sched_entity *curr = cfs_rq->curr; struct sched_entity *best = NULL; + struct sched_entity *best_left = NULL; if (curr && (!curr->on_rq || !entity_eligible(cfs_rq, curr))) curr = NULL; + best = curr; /* * Once selected, run a task until it either becomes non-eligible or @@ -900,33 +902,75 @@ static struct sched_entity *pick_eevdf(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) } /* - * If this entity has an earlier deadline than the previous - * best, take this one. If it also has the earliest deadline - * of its subtree, we're done. + * Now we heap search eligible trees for the best (min_)deadline */ - if (!best || deadline_gt(deadline, best, se)) { + if (!best || deadline_gt(deadline, best, se)) best = se; - if (best->deadline == best->min_deadline) - break; - } /* - * If the earlest deadline in this subtree is in the fully - * eligible left half of our space, go there. + * Every se in a left branch is eligible, keep track of the + * branch with the best min_deadline */ + if (node->rb_left) { + struct sched_entity *left = __node_2_se(node->rb_left); + + if (!best_left || deadline_gt(min_deadline, best_left, left)) + best_left = left; + + /* + * min_deadline is in the left branch. rb_left and all + * descendants are eligible, so immediately switch to the second + * loop. + */ + if (left->min_deadline == se->min_deadline) + break; + } + + /* min_deadline is at this node, no need to look right */ + if (se->deadline == se->min_deadline) + break; + + /* else min_deadline is in the right branch. */ + node = node->rb_right; + } + + /* + * We ran into an eligible node which is itself the best. + * (Or nr_running == 0 and both are NULL) + */ + if (!best_left || (s64)(best_left->min_deadline - best->deadline) > 0) + return best; + + /* + * Now best_left and all of its children are eligible, and we are just + * looking for deadline == min_deadline + */ + node = &best_left->run_node; + while (node) { + struct sched_entity *se = __node_2_se(node); + + /* min_deadline is the current node */ + if (se->deadline == se->min_deadline) + return se; + + /* min_deadline is in the left branch */ if (node->rb_left && __node_2_se(node->rb_left)->min_deadline == se->min_deadline) { node = node->rb_left; continue; } + /* else min_deadline is in the right branch */ node = node->rb_right; } + return NULL; +} - if (!best || (curr && deadline_gt(deadline, best, curr))) - best = curr; +static struct sched_entity *pick_eevdf(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) +{ + struct sched_entity *se = __pick_eevdf(cfs_rq); - if (unlikely(!best)) { + if (!se) { struct sched_entity *left = __pick_first_entity(cfs_rq); if (left) { pr_err("EEVDF scheduling fail, picking leftmost\n"); @@ -934,7 +978,7 @@ static struct sched_entity *pick_eevdf(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) } } - return best; + return se; } #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG |