summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/bootconfig.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMasami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>2021-06-02 17:19:07 +0900
committerSteven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>2021-06-10 13:41:26 -0400
commite5efaeb8a8f527d6e91289ff1f67fbcae452b2ca (patch)
treeb2a1a004dc24a7e03f2fb819689e5c35cce00d12 /lib/bootconfig.c
parentca24306d83a125df187ad53eddb038fe0cffb8ca (diff)
downloadlinux-e5efaeb8a8f527d6e91289ff1f67fbcae452b2ca.tar.gz
linux-e5efaeb8a8f527d6e91289ff1f67fbcae452b2ca.tar.bz2
linux-e5efaeb8a8f527d6e91289ff1f67fbcae452b2ca.zip
bootconfig: Support mixing a value and subkeys under a key
Support mixing a value and subkeys under a key. Since kernel cmdline options will support "aaa.bbb=value1 aaa.bbb.ccc=value2", it is better that the bootconfig supports such configuration too. Note that this does not change syntax itself but just accepts mixed value and subkeys e.g. key = value1 key.subkey = value2 But this is not accepted; key { value1 subkey = value2 } That will make value1 as a subkey. Also, the order of the value node under a key is fixed. If there are a value and subkeys, the value is always the first child node of the key. Thus if user specifies subkeys first, e.g. key.subkey = value1 key = value2 In the program (and /proc/bootconfig), it will be shown as below key = value2 key.subkey = value1 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/162262194685.264090.7738574774030567419.stgit@devnote2 Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/bootconfig.c')
-rw-r--r--lib/bootconfig.c65
1 files changed, 45 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/lib/bootconfig.c b/lib/bootconfig.c
index 44dcdcbd746a..927017431fb6 100644
--- a/lib/bootconfig.c
+++ b/lib/bootconfig.c
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ xbc_node_find_child(struct xbc_node *parent, const char *key)
struct xbc_node *node;
if (parent)
- node = xbc_node_get_child(parent);
+ node = xbc_node_get_subkey(parent);
else
node = xbc_root_node();
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ xbc_node_find_child(struct xbc_node *parent, const char *key)
if (!xbc_node_match_prefix(node, &key))
node = xbc_node_get_next(node);
else if (*key != '\0')
- node = xbc_node_get_child(node);
+ node = xbc_node_get_subkey(node);
else
break;
}
@@ -274,6 +274,8 @@ int __init xbc_node_compose_key_after(struct xbc_node *root,
struct xbc_node * __init xbc_node_find_next_leaf(struct xbc_node *root,
struct xbc_node *node)
{
+ struct xbc_node *next;
+
if (unlikely(!xbc_data))
return NULL;
@@ -282,6 +284,13 @@ struct xbc_node * __init xbc_node_find_next_leaf(struct xbc_node *root,
if (!node)
node = xbc_nodes;
} else {
+ /* Leaf node may have a subkey */
+ next = xbc_node_get_subkey(node);
+ if (next) {
+ node = next;
+ goto found;
+ }
+
if (node == root) /* @root was a leaf, no child node. */
return NULL;
@@ -296,6 +305,7 @@ struct xbc_node * __init xbc_node_find_next_leaf(struct xbc_node *root,
node = xbc_node_get_next(node);
}
+found:
while (node && !xbc_node_is_leaf(node))
node = xbc_node_get_child(node);
@@ -375,18 +385,20 @@ static inline __init struct xbc_node *xbc_last_child(struct xbc_node *node)
return node;
}
-static struct xbc_node * __init xbc_add_sibling(char *data, u32 flag)
+static struct xbc_node * __init __xbc_add_sibling(char *data, u32 flag, bool head)
{
struct xbc_node *sib, *node = xbc_add_node(data, flag);
if (node) {
if (!last_parent) {
+ /* Ignore @head in this case */
node->parent = XBC_NODE_MAX;
sib = xbc_last_sibling(xbc_nodes);
sib->next = xbc_node_index(node);
} else {
node->parent = xbc_node_index(last_parent);
- if (!last_parent->child) {
+ if (!last_parent->child || head) {
+ node->next = last_parent->child;
last_parent->child = xbc_node_index(node);
} else {
sib = xbc_node_get_child(last_parent);
@@ -400,6 +412,16 @@ static struct xbc_node * __init xbc_add_sibling(char *data, u32 flag)
return node;
}
+static inline struct xbc_node * __init xbc_add_sibling(char *data, u32 flag)
+{
+ return __xbc_add_sibling(data, flag, false);
+}
+
+static inline struct xbc_node * __init xbc_add_head_sibling(char *data, u32 flag)
+{
+ return __xbc_add_sibling(data, flag, true);
+}
+
static inline __init struct xbc_node *xbc_add_child(char *data, u32 flag)
{
struct xbc_node *node = xbc_add_sibling(data, flag);
@@ -568,8 +590,9 @@ static int __init __xbc_add_key(char *k)
node = find_match_node(xbc_nodes, k);
else {
child = xbc_node_get_child(last_parent);
+ /* Since the value node is the first child, skip it. */
if (child && xbc_node_is_value(child))
- return xbc_parse_error("Subkey is mixed with value", k);
+ child = xbc_node_get_next(child);
node = find_match_node(child, k);
}
@@ -612,27 +635,29 @@ static int __init xbc_parse_kv(char **k, char *v, int op)
if (ret)
return ret;
- child = xbc_node_get_child(last_parent);
- if (child) {
- if (xbc_node_is_key(child))
- return xbc_parse_error("Value is mixed with subkey", v);
- else if (op == '=')
- return xbc_parse_error("Value is redefined", v);
- }
-
c = __xbc_parse_value(&v, &next);
if (c < 0)
return c;
- if (op == ':' && child) {
- xbc_init_node(child, v, XBC_VALUE);
- } else {
- if (op == '+' && child)
- last_parent = xbc_last_child(child);
- if (!xbc_add_sibling(v, XBC_VALUE))
- return -ENOMEM;
+ child = xbc_node_get_child(last_parent);
+ if (child && xbc_node_is_value(child)) {
+ if (op == '=')
+ return xbc_parse_error("Value is redefined", v);
+ if (op == ':') {
+ unsigned short nidx = child->next;
+
+ xbc_init_node(child, v, XBC_VALUE);
+ child->next = nidx; /* keep subkeys */
+ goto array;
+ }
+ /* op must be '+' */
+ last_parent = xbc_last_child(child);
}
+ /* The value node should always be the first child */
+ if (!xbc_add_head_sibling(v, XBC_VALUE))
+ return -ENOMEM;
+array:
if (c == ',') { /* Array */
c = xbc_parse_array(&next);
if (c < 0)