diff options
author | Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> | 2016-09-17 01:28:26 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com> | 2016-09-17 08:39:16 -0600 |
commit | 05fd095d53b979878f016c3a7080d3683cc89d72 (patch) | |
tree | 93751c669d2cba783d4762127efa949ad4bda5f9 /lib/sbitmap.c | |
parent | 98d95416dbfaf4910caadfb4ddc75e4aacbdff8c (diff) | |
download | linux-05fd095d53b979878f016c3a7080d3683cc89d72.tar.gz linux-05fd095d53b979878f016c3a7080d3683cc89d72.tar.bz2 linux-05fd095d53b979878f016c3a7080d3683cc89d72.zip |
sbitmap: re-initialize allocation hints after resize
After a struct sbitmap_queue is resized smaller, the allocation hints
may still be set to bits beyond the new depth of the bitmap. This means
that, for example, if the number of blk-mq tags is reduced through
sysfs, more requests than the nominal queue depth may be in flight.
It's tempting to fix this at resize time by doing a one-time
reinitialization of the hints, but this can race with
__sbitmap_queue_get() updating the hint. Instead, check the hint before
we use it. This caused no measurable performance difference in my
synthetic benchmarks.
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/sbitmap.c')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/sbitmap.c | 9 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/lib/sbitmap.c b/lib/sbitmap.c index 928b82a733f2..f736c52a712c 100644 --- a/lib/sbitmap.c +++ b/lib/sbitmap.c @@ -246,10 +246,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sbitmap_queue_resize); int __sbitmap_queue_get(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq) { - unsigned int hint; + unsigned int hint, depth; int nr; hint = this_cpu_read(*sbq->alloc_hint); + depth = READ_ONCE(sbq->sb.depth); + if (unlikely(hint >= depth)) { + hint = depth ? prandom_u32() % depth : 0; + this_cpu_write(*sbq->alloc_hint, hint); + } nr = sbitmap_get(&sbq->sb, hint, sbq->round_robin); if (nr == -1) { @@ -258,7 +263,7 @@ int __sbitmap_queue_get(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq) } else if (nr == hint || unlikely(sbq->round_robin)) { /* Only update the hint if we used it. */ hint = nr + 1; - if (hint >= sbq->sb.depth - 1) + if (hint >= depth - 1) hint = 0; this_cpu_write(*sbq->alloc_hint, hint); } |