diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2019-10-18 18:19:04 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2019-10-18 18:19:04 -0400 |
commit | 8eb4b3b0dd9ae3e5399ff902da87d13740a2b70f (patch) | |
tree | b4660fe0fbd97aee24f1e9f7961815c34ce808b6 /lib | |
parent | 7571438a4868e7cb09d698ab52e54f9722020eef (diff) | |
parent | f418dddffc8007945fd5962380ebde770a240cf5 (diff) | |
download | linux-8eb4b3b0dd9ae3e5399ff902da87d13740a2b70f.tar.gz linux-8eb4b3b0dd9ae3e5399ff902da87d13740a2b70f.tar.bz2 linux-8eb4b3b0dd9ae3e5399ff902da87d13740a2b70f.zip |
Merge tag 'copy-struct-from-user-v5.4-rc4' of gitolite.kernel.org:pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brauner/linux
Pull usercopy test fixlets from Christian Brauner:
"This contains two improvements for the copy_struct_from_user() tests:
- a coding style change to get rid of the ugly "if ((ret |= test()))"
pointed out when pulling the original patchset.
- avoid a soft lockups when running the usercopy tests on machines
with large page sizes by scanning only a 1024 byte region"
* tag 'copy-struct-from-user-v5.4-rc4' of gitolite.kernel.org:pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brauner/linux:
usercopy: Avoid soft lockups in test_check_nonzero_user()
lib: test_user_copy: style cleanup
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/test_user_copy.c | 37 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/lib/test_user_copy.c b/lib/test_user_copy.c index e365ace06538..5ff04d8fe971 100644 --- a/lib/test_user_copy.c +++ b/lib/test_user_copy.c @@ -47,18 +47,35 @@ static bool is_zeroed(void *from, size_t size) static int test_check_nonzero_user(char *kmem, char __user *umem, size_t size) { int ret = 0; - size_t start, end, i; - size_t zero_start = size / 4; - size_t zero_end = size - zero_start; + size_t start, end, i, zero_start, zero_end; + + if (test(size < 2 * PAGE_SIZE, "buffer too small")) + return -EINVAL; + + /* + * We want to cross a page boundary to exercise the code more + * effectively. We also don't want to make the size we scan too large, + * otherwise the test can take a long time and cause soft lockups. So + * scan a 1024 byte region across the page boundary. + */ + size = 1024; + start = PAGE_SIZE - (size / 2); + + kmem += start; + umem += start; + + zero_start = size / 4; + zero_end = size - zero_start; /* - * We conduct a series of check_nonzero_user() tests on a block of memory - * with the following byte-pattern (trying every possible [start,end] - * pair): + * We conduct a series of check_nonzero_user() tests on a block of + * memory with the following byte-pattern (trying every possible + * [start,end] pair): * * [ 00 ff 00 ff ... 00 00 00 00 ... ff 00 ff 00 ] * - * And we verify that check_nonzero_user() acts identically to memchr_inv(). + * And we verify that check_nonzero_user() acts identically to + * memchr_inv(). */ memset(kmem, 0x0, size); @@ -93,11 +110,13 @@ static int test_copy_struct_from_user(char *kmem, char __user *umem, size_t ksize, usize; umem_src = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); - if ((ret |= test(umem_src == NULL, "kmalloc failed"))) + ret = test(umem_src == NULL, "kmalloc failed"); + if (ret) goto out_free; expected = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); - if ((ret |= test(expected == NULL, "kmalloc failed"))) + ret = test(expected == NULL, "kmalloc failed"); + if (ret) goto out_free; /* Fill umem with a fixed byte pattern. */ |