diff options
| author | Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> | 2006-09-25 23:31:19 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org> | 2006-09-26 08:48:47 -0700 |
| commit | 19655d3487001d7df0e10e9cbfc27c758b77c2b5 (patch) | |
| tree | 8d0aaa216bd32bd64e3a9652fd34d40bdb9d1075 /mm/mempolicy.c | |
| parent | 2f6726e54a9410e2e4cee864947c05e954051916 (diff) | |
| download | linux-19655d3487001d7df0e10e9cbfc27c758b77c2b5.tar.gz linux-19655d3487001d7df0e10e9cbfc27c758b77c2b5.tar.bz2 linux-19655d3487001d7df0e10e9cbfc27c758b77c2b5.zip | |
[PATCH] linearly index zone->node_zonelists[]
I wonder why we need this bitmask indexing into zone->node_zonelists[]?
We always start with the highest zone and then include all lower zones
if we build zonelists.
Are there really cases where we need allocation from ZONE_DMA or
ZONE_HIGHMEM but not ZONE_NORMAL? It seems that the current implementation
of highest_zone() makes that already impossible.
If we go linear on the index then gfp_zone() == highest_zone() and a lot
of definitions fall by the wayside.
We can now revert back to the use of gfp_zone() in mempolicy.c ;-)
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/mempolicy.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/mempolicy.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c index 7da4142ce960..c3429a710ab1 100644 --- a/mm/mempolicy.c +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c @@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@ static struct zonelist *zonelist_policy(gfp_t gfp, struct mempolicy *policy) case MPOL_BIND: /* Lower zones don't get a policy applied */ /* Careful: current->mems_allowed might have moved */ - if (highest_zone(gfp) >= policy_zone) + if (gfp_zone(gfp) >= policy_zone) if (cpuset_zonelist_valid_mems_allowed(policy->v.zonelist)) return policy->v.zonelist; /*FALL THROUGH*/ |