diff options
| author | KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> | 2010-03-05 13:41:55 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2010-03-06 11:26:25 -0800 |
| commit | 93e4a89a8c987189b168a530a331ef6d0fcf07a7 (patch) | |
| tree | deb08017c0e4874539549d3ea9bf2d7b447a43be /mm/vmscan.c | |
| parent | fc91668eaf9e7ba61e867fc2218b7e9fb67faa4f (diff) | |
| download | linux-93e4a89a8c987189b168a530a331ef6d0fcf07a7.tar.gz linux-93e4a89a8c987189b168a530a331ef6d0fcf07a7.tar.bz2 linux-93e4a89a8c987189b168a530a331ef6d0fcf07a7.zip | |
mm: restore zone->all_unreclaimable to independence word
commit e815af95 ("change all_unreclaimable zone member to flags") changed
all_unreclaimable member to bit flag. But it had an undesireble side
effect. free_one_page() is one of most hot path in linux kernel and
increasing atomic ops in it can reduce kernel performance a bit.
Thus, this patch revert such commit partially. at least
all_unreclaimable shouldn't share memory word with other zone flags.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix patch interaction]
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Huang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/vmscan.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/vmscan.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index bc0f8db8340f..5cbf64dd79c1 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -1699,8 +1699,7 @@ static void shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist, continue; note_zone_scanning_priority(zone, priority); - if (zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone) && - priority != DEF_PRIORITY) + if (zone->all_unreclaimable && priority != DEF_PRIORITY) continue; /* Let kswapd poll it */ sc->all_unreclaimable = 0; } else { @@ -1927,7 +1926,7 @@ static int sleeping_prematurely(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, long remaining) if (!populated_zone(zone)) continue; - if (zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone)) + if (zone->all_unreclaimable) continue; if (!zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, high_wmark_pages(zone), @@ -2017,8 +2016,7 @@ loop_again: if (!populated_zone(zone)) continue; - if (zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone) && - priority != DEF_PRIORITY) + if (zone->all_unreclaimable && priority != DEF_PRIORITY) continue; /* @@ -2061,8 +2059,7 @@ loop_again: if (!populated_zone(zone)) continue; - if (zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone) && - priority != DEF_PRIORITY) + if (zone->all_unreclaimable && priority != DEF_PRIORITY) continue; temp_priority[i] = priority; @@ -2089,12 +2086,11 @@ loop_again: lru_pages); sc.nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab; total_scanned += sc.nr_scanned; - if (zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone)) + if (zone->all_unreclaimable) continue; - if (nr_slab == 0 && zone->pages_scanned >= - (zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) * 6)) - zone_set_flag(zone, - ZONE_ALL_UNRECLAIMABLE); + if (nr_slab == 0 && + zone->pages_scanned >= (zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) * 6)) + zone->all_unreclaimable = 1; /* * If we've done a decent amount of scanning and * the reclaim ratio is low, start doing writepage @@ -2624,7 +2620,7 @@ int zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order) zone_page_state(zone, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE) <= zone->min_slab_pages) return ZONE_RECLAIM_FULL; - if (zone_is_all_unreclaimable(zone)) + if (zone->all_unreclaimable) return ZONE_RECLAIM_FULL; /* |