diff options
author | Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com> | 2012-01-12 17:17:59 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2012-01-12 20:13:05 -0800 |
commit | 5660048ccac8735d9bc0a46325a02e6a6518b5b2 (patch) | |
tree | 4b2269ddd6ca001843187a89fb91278192028d87 /mm/vmscan.c | |
parent | 527a5ec9a53471d855291ba9f1fdf1dd4e12a184 (diff) | |
download | linux-5660048ccac8735d9bc0a46325a02e6a6518b5b2.tar.gz linux-5660048ccac8735d9bc0a46325a02e6a6518b5b2.tar.bz2 linux-5660048ccac8735d9bc0a46325a02e6a6518b5b2.zip |
mm: move memcg hierarchy reclaim to generic reclaim code
Memory cgroup limit reclaim and traditional global pressure reclaim will
soon share the same code to reclaim from a hierarchical tree of memory
cgroups.
In preparation of this, move the two right next to each other in
shrink_zone().
The mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim() polymath is split into a soft
limit reclaim function, which still does hierarchy walking on its own,
and a limit (shrinking) reclaim function, which relies on generic
reclaim code to walk the hierarchy.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/vmscan.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/vmscan.c | 43 |
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index e0627d07c3ac..136c7eb0ad88 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -2104,12 +2104,43 @@ restart: static void shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc) { - struct mem_cgroup_zone mz = { - .mem_cgroup = sc->target_mem_cgroup, + struct mem_cgroup *root = sc->target_mem_cgroup; + struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie reclaim = { .zone = zone, + .priority = priority, }; + struct mem_cgroup *memcg; + + if (global_reclaim(sc)) { + struct mem_cgroup_zone mz = { + .mem_cgroup = NULL, + .zone = zone, + }; + + shrink_mem_cgroup_zone(priority, &mz, sc); + return; + } + + memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root, NULL, &reclaim); + do { + struct mem_cgroup_zone mz = { + .mem_cgroup = memcg, + .zone = zone, + }; - shrink_mem_cgroup_zone(priority, &mz, sc); + shrink_mem_cgroup_zone(priority, &mz, sc); + /* + * Limit reclaim has historically picked one memcg and + * scanned it with decreasing priority levels until + * nr_to_reclaim had been reclaimed. This priority + * cycle is thus over after a single memcg. + */ + if (!global_reclaim(sc)) { + mem_cgroup_iter_break(root, memcg); + break; + } + memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root, memcg, &reclaim); + } while (memcg); } /* @@ -2374,6 +2405,10 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem, .order = 0, .target_mem_cgroup = mem, }; + struct mem_cgroup_zone mz = { + .mem_cgroup = mem, + .zone = zone, + }; sc.gfp_mask = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) | (GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE & ~GFP_RECLAIM_MASK); @@ -2389,7 +2424,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(struct mem_cgroup *mem, * will pick up pages from other mem cgroup's as well. We hack * the priority and make it zero. */ - shrink_zone(0, zone, &sc); + shrink_mem_cgroup_zone(0, &mz, &sc); trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_softlimit_reclaim_end(sc.nr_reclaimed); |