mm: reclaim small amounts of memory when an external fragmentation event occurs

An external fragmentation event was previously described as

    When the page allocator fragments memory, it records the event using
    the mm_page_alloc_extfrag event. If the fallback_order is smaller
    than a pageblock order (order-9 on 64-bit x86) then it's considered
    an event that will cause external fragmentation issues in the future.

The kernel reduces the probability of such events by increasing the
watermark sizes by calling set_recommended_min_free_kbytes early in the
lifetime of the system.  This works reasonably well in general but if
there are enough sparsely populated pageblocks then the problem can still
occur as enough memory is free overall and kswapd stays asleep.

This patch introduces a watermark_boost_factor sysctl that allows a zone
watermark to be temporarily boosted when an external fragmentation causing
events occurs.  The boosting will stall allocations that would decrease
free memory below the boosted low watermark and kswapd is woken if the
calling context allows to reclaim an amount of memory relative to the size
of the high watermark and the watermark_boost_factor until the boost is
cleared.  When kswapd finishes, it wakes kcompactd at the pageblock order
to clean some of the pageblocks that may have been affected by the
fragmentation event.  kswapd avoids any writeback, slab shrinkage and swap
from reclaim context during this operation to avoid excessive system
disruption in the name of fragmentation avoidance.  Care is taken so that
kswapd will do normal reclaim work if the system is really low on memory.

This was evaluated using the same workloads as "mm, page_alloc: Spread
allocations across zones before introducing fragmentation".

1-socket Skylake machine
config-global-dhp__workload_thpfioscale XFS (no special madvise)
4 fio threads, 1 THP allocating thread
--------------------------------------

4.20-rc3 extfrag events < order 9:   804694
4.20-rc3+patch:                      408912 (49% reduction)
4.20-rc3+patch1-4:                    18421 (98% reduction)

                                   4.20.0-rc3             4.20.0-rc3
                                 lowzone-v5r8             boost-v5r8
Amean     fault-base-1      653.58 (   0.00%)      652.71 (   0.13%)
Amean     fault-huge-1        0.00 (   0.00%)      178.93 * -99.00%*

                              4.20.0-rc3             4.20.0-rc3
                            lowzone-v5r8             boost-v5r8
Percentage huge-1        0.00 (   0.00%)        5.12 ( 100.00%)

Note that external fragmentation causing events are massively reduced by
this path whether in comparison to the previous kernel or the vanilla
kernel.  The fault latency for huge pages appears to be increased but that
is only because THP allocations were successful with the patch applied.

1-socket Skylake machine
global-dhp__workload_thpfioscale-madvhugepage-xfs (MADV_HUGEPAGE)
-----------------------------------------------------------------

4.20-rc3 extfrag events < order 9:  291392
4.20-rc3+patch:                     191187 (34% reduction)
4.20-rc3+patch1-4:                   13464 (95% reduction)

thpfioscale Fault Latencies
                                   4.20.0-rc3             4.20.0-rc3
                                 lowzone-v5r8             boost-v5r8
Min       fault-base-1      912.00 (   0.00%)      905.00 (   0.77%)
Min       fault-huge-1      127.00 (   0.00%)      135.00 (  -6.30%)
Amean     fault-base-1     1467.55 (   0.00%)     1481.67 (  -0.96%)
Amean     fault-huge-1     1127.11 (   0.00%)     1063.88 *   5.61%*

                              4.20.0-rc3             4.20.0-rc3
                            lowzone-v5r8             boost-v5r8
Percentage huge-1       77.64 (   0.00%)       83.46 (   7.49%)

As before, massive reduction in external fragmentation events, some jitter
on latencies and an increase in THP allocation success rates.

2-socket Haswell machine
config-global-dhp__workload_thpfioscale XFS (no special madvise)
4 fio threads, 5 THP allocating threads
----------------------------------------------------------------

4.20-rc3 extfrag events < order 9:  215698
4.20-rc3+patch:                     200210 (7% reduction)
4.20-rc3+patch1-4:                   14263 (93% reduction)

                                   4.20.0-rc3             4.20.0-rc3
                                 lowzone-v5r8             boost-v5r8
Amean     fault-base-5     1346.45 (   0.00%)     1306.87 (   2.94%)
Amean     fault-huge-5     3418.60 (   0.00%)     1348.94 (  60.54%)

                              4.20.0-rc3             4.20.0-rc3
                            lowzone-v5r8             boost-v5r8
Percentage huge-5        0.78 (   0.00%)        7.91 ( 910.64%)

There is a 93% reduction in fragmentation causing events, there is a big
reduction in the huge page fault latency and allocation success rate is
higher.

2-socket Haswell machine
global-dhp__workload_thpfioscale-madvhugepage-xfs (MADV_HUGEPAGE)
-----------------------------------------------------------------

4.20-rc3 extfrag events < order 9: 166352
4.20-rc3+patch:                    147463 (11% reduction)
4.20-rc3+patch1-4:                  11095 (93% reduction)

thpfioscale Fault Latencies
                                   4.20.0-rc3             4.20.0-rc3
                                 lowzone-v5r8             boost-v5r8
Amean     fault-base-5     6217.43 (   0.00%)     7419.67 * -19.34%*
Amean     fault-huge-5     3163.33 (   0.00%)     3263.80 (  -3.18%)

                              4.20.0-rc3             4.20.0-rc3
                            lowzone-v5r8             boost-v5r8
Percentage huge-5       95.14 (   0.00%)       87.98 (  -7.53%)

There is a large reduction in fragmentation events with some jitter around
the latencies and success rates.  As before, the high THP allocation
success rate does mean the system is under a lot of pressure.  However, as
the fragmentation events are reduced, it would be expected that the
long-term allocation success rate would be higher.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181123114528.28802-5-mgorman@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Zi Yan <zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 124 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 24ab1f7394ab..bd8971a29204 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -88,6 +88,9 @@ struct scan_control {
 	/* Can pages be swapped as part of reclaim? */
 	unsigned int may_swap:1;
 
+	/* e.g. boosted watermark reclaim leaves slabs alone */
+	unsigned int may_shrinkslab:1;
+
 	/*
 	 * Cgroups are not reclaimed below their configured memory.low,
 	 * unless we threaten to OOM. If any cgroups are skipped due to
@@ -2756,8 +2759,10 @@ static bool shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
 			shrink_node_memcg(pgdat, memcg, sc, &lru_pages);
 			node_lru_pages += lru_pages;
 
-			shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, pgdat->node_id,
+			if (sc->may_shrinkslab) {
+				shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, pgdat->node_id,
 				    memcg, sc->priority);
+			}
 
 			/* Record the group's reclaim efficiency */
 			vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, memcg, false,
@@ -3239,6 +3244,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order,
 		.may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
 		.may_unmap = 1,
 		.may_swap = 1,
+		.may_shrinkslab = 1,
 	};
 
 	/*
@@ -3283,6 +3289,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_shrink_node(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 		.may_unmap = 1,
 		.reclaim_idx = MAX_NR_ZONES - 1,
 		.may_swap = !noswap,
+		.may_shrinkslab = 1,
 	};
 	unsigned long lru_pages;
 
@@ -3329,6 +3336,7 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 		.may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
 		.may_unmap = 1,
 		.may_swap = may_swap,
+		.may_shrinkslab = 1,
 	};
 
 	/*
@@ -3379,6 +3387,30 @@ static void age_active_anon(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
 	} while (memcg);
 }
 
+static bool pgdat_watermark_boosted(pg_data_t *pgdat, int classzone_idx)
+{
+	int i;
+	struct zone *zone;
+
+	/*
+	 * Check for watermark boosts top-down as the higher zones
+	 * are more likely to be boosted. Both watermarks and boosts
+	 * should not be checked at the time time as reclaim would
+	 * start prematurely when there is no boosting and a lower
+	 * zone is balanced.
+	 */
+	for (i = classzone_idx; i >= 0; i--) {
+		zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
+		if (!managed_zone(zone))
+			continue;
+
+		if (zone->watermark_boost)
+			return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 /*
  * Returns true if there is an eligible zone balanced for the request order
  * and classzone_idx
@@ -3389,6 +3421,10 @@ static bool pgdat_balanced(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
 	unsigned long mark = -1;
 	struct zone *zone;
 
+	/*
+	 * Check watermarks bottom-up as lower zones are more likely to
+	 * meet watermarks.
+	 */
 	for (i = 0; i <= classzone_idx; i++) {
 		zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
 
@@ -3517,14 +3553,14 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
 	unsigned long nr_soft_reclaimed;
 	unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
 	unsigned long pflags;
+	unsigned long nr_boost_reclaim;
+	unsigned long zone_boosts[MAX_NR_ZONES] = { 0, };
+	bool boosted;
 	struct zone *zone;
 	struct scan_control sc = {
 		.gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
 		.order = order,
-		.priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
-		.may_writepage = !laptop_mode,
 		.may_unmap = 1,
-		.may_swap = 1,
 	};
 
 	psi_memstall_enter(&pflags);
@@ -3532,9 +3568,28 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
 
 	count_vm_event(PAGEOUTRUN);
 
+	/*
+	 * Account for the reclaim boost. Note that the zone boost is left in
+	 * place so that parallel allocations that are near the watermark will
+	 * stall or direct reclaim until kswapd is finished.
+	 */
+	nr_boost_reclaim = 0;
+	for (i = 0; i <= classzone_idx; i++) {
+		zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
+		if (!managed_zone(zone))
+			continue;
+
+		nr_boost_reclaim += zone->watermark_boost;
+		zone_boosts[i] = zone->watermark_boost;
+	}
+	boosted = nr_boost_reclaim;
+
+restart:
+	sc.priority = DEF_PRIORITY;
 	do {
 		unsigned long nr_reclaimed = sc.nr_reclaimed;
 		bool raise_priority = true;
+		bool balanced;
 		bool ret;
 
 		sc.reclaim_idx = classzone_idx;
@@ -3561,13 +3616,40 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
 		}
 
 		/*
-		 * Only reclaim if there are no eligible zones. Note that
-		 * sc.reclaim_idx is not used as buffer_heads_over_limit may
-		 * have adjusted it.
+		 * If the pgdat is imbalanced then ignore boosting and preserve
+		 * the watermarks for a later time and restart. Note that the
+		 * zone watermarks will be still reset at the end of balancing
+		 * on the grounds that the normal reclaim should be enough to
+		 * re-evaluate if boosting is required when kswapd next wakes.
+		 */
+		balanced = pgdat_balanced(pgdat, sc.order, classzone_idx);
+		if (!balanced && nr_boost_reclaim) {
+			nr_boost_reclaim = 0;
+			goto restart;
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * If boosting is not active then only reclaim if there are no
+		 * eligible zones. Note that sc.reclaim_idx is not used as
+		 * buffer_heads_over_limit may have adjusted it.
 		 */
-		if (pgdat_balanced(pgdat, sc.order, classzone_idx))
+		if (!nr_boost_reclaim && balanced)
 			goto out;
 
+		/* Limit the priority of boosting to avoid reclaim writeback */
+		if (nr_boost_reclaim && sc.priority == DEF_PRIORITY - 2)
+			raise_priority = false;
+
+		/*
+		 * Do not writeback or swap pages for boosted reclaim. The
+		 * intent is to relieve pressure not issue sub-optimal IO
+		 * from reclaim context. If no pages are reclaimed, the
+		 * reclaim will be aborted.
+		 */
+		sc.may_writepage = !laptop_mode && !nr_boost_reclaim;
+		sc.may_swap = !nr_boost_reclaim;
+		sc.may_shrinkslab = !nr_boost_reclaim;
+
 		/*
 		 * Do some background aging of the anon list, to give
 		 * pages a chance to be referenced before reclaiming. All
@@ -3619,6 +3701,16 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
 		 * progress in reclaiming pages
 		 */
 		nr_reclaimed = sc.nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed;
+		nr_boost_reclaim -= min(nr_boost_reclaim, nr_reclaimed);
+
+		/*
+		 * If reclaim made no progress for a boost, stop reclaim as
+		 * IO cannot be queued and it could be an infinite loop in
+		 * extreme circumstances.
+		 */
+		if (nr_boost_reclaim && !nr_reclaimed)
+			break;
+
 		if (raise_priority || !nr_reclaimed)
 			sc.priority--;
 	} while (sc.priority >= 1);
@@ -3627,6 +3719,28 @@ static int balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, int classzone_idx)
 		pgdat->kswapd_failures++;
 
 out:
+	/* If reclaim was boosted, account for the reclaim done in this pass */
+	if (boosted) {
+		unsigned long flags;
+
+		for (i = 0; i <= classzone_idx; i++) {
+			if (!zone_boosts[i])
+				continue;
+
+			/* Increments are under the zone lock */
+			zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
+			spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags);
+			zone->watermark_boost -= min(zone->watermark_boost, zone_boosts[i]);
+			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags);
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * As there is now likely space, wakeup kcompact to defragment
+		 * pageblocks.
+		 */
+		wakeup_kcompactd(pgdat, pageblock_order, classzone_idx);
+	}
+
 	snapshot_refaults(NULL, pgdat);
 	__fs_reclaim_release();
 	psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);
@@ -3855,7 +3969,8 @@ void wakeup_kswapd(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_flags, int order,
 
 	/* Hopeless node, leave it to direct reclaim if possible */
 	if (pgdat->kswapd_failures >= MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES ||
-	    pgdat_balanced(pgdat, order, classzone_idx)) {
+	    (pgdat_balanced(pgdat, order, classzone_idx) &&
+	     !pgdat_watermark_boosted(pgdat, classzone_idx))) {
 		/*
 		 * There may be plenty of free memory available, but it's too
 		 * fragmented for high-order allocations.  Wake up kcompactd