diff options
| author | Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com> | 2012-01-12 17:18:06 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2012-01-12 20:13:05 -0800 |
| commit | b95a2f2d486d0d768a92879c023a03757b9c7e58 (patch) | |
| tree | 4f07a63d7587131bd82c49e0d9ac124d057539fd /mm/vmscan.c | |
| parent | ad2b8e601099a23dffffb53f91c18d874fe98854 (diff) | |
| download | linux-b95a2f2d486d0d768a92879c023a03757b9c7e58.tar.gz linux-b95a2f2d486d0d768a92879c023a03757b9c7e58.tar.bz2 linux-b95a2f2d486d0d768a92879c023a03757b9c7e58.zip | |
mm: vmscan: convert global reclaim to per-memcg LRU lists
The global per-zone LRU lists are about to go away on memcg-enabled
kernels, global reclaim must be able to find its pages on the per-memcg
LRU lists.
Since the LRU pages of a zone are distributed over all existing memory
cgroups, a scan target for a zone is complete when all memory cgroups
are scanned for their proportional share of a zone's memory.
The forced scanning of small scan targets from kswapd is limited to
zones marked unreclaimable, otherwise kswapd can quickly overreclaim by
force-scanning the LRU lists of multiple memory cgroups.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/vmscan.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/vmscan.c | 39 |
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 136c7eb0ad88..024168cfdcb0 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -1886,7 +1886,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct mem_cgroup_zone *mz, struct scan_control *sc, * latencies, so it's better to scan a minimum amount there as * well. */ - if (current_is_kswapd()) + if (current_is_kswapd() && mz->zone->all_unreclaimable) force_scan = true; if (!global_reclaim(sc)) force_scan = true; @@ -2111,16 +2111,6 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone, }; struct mem_cgroup *memcg; - if (global_reclaim(sc)) { - struct mem_cgroup_zone mz = { - .mem_cgroup = NULL, - .zone = zone, - }; - - shrink_mem_cgroup_zone(priority, &mz, sc); - return; - } - memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(root, NULL, &reclaim); do { struct mem_cgroup_zone mz = { @@ -2134,6 +2124,10 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone, * scanned it with decreasing priority levels until * nr_to_reclaim had been reclaimed. This priority * cycle is thus over after a single memcg. + * + * Direct reclaim and kswapd, on the other hand, have + * to scan all memory cgroups to fulfill the overall + * scan target for the zone. */ if (!global_reclaim(sc)) { mem_cgroup_iter_break(root, memcg); @@ -2478,13 +2472,24 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *mem_cont, static void age_active_anon(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc, int priority) { - struct mem_cgroup_zone mz = { - .mem_cgroup = NULL, - .zone = zone, - }; + struct mem_cgroup *memcg; - if (inactive_anon_is_low(&mz)) - shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, &mz, sc, priority, 0); + if (!total_swap_pages) + return; + + memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, NULL, NULL); + do { + struct mem_cgroup_zone mz = { + .mem_cgroup = memcg, + .zone = zone, + }; + + if (inactive_anon_is_low(&mz)) + shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, &mz, + sc, priority, 0); + + memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL); + } while (memcg); } /* |