diff options
author | Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> | 2019-07-11 21:00:26 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2019-07-12 11:05:47 -0700 |
commit | 6ba749ee78ef42ffdf4b95c042fc574a37d229d9 (patch) | |
tree | cfe8087747269d44a79dbeecb6be94c82d9af034 /mm | |
parent | 5eee7e1cdb97123bb55ac14ccd3af8b6edc31537 (diff) | |
download | linux-6ba749ee78ef42ffdf4b95c042fc574a37d229d9.tar.gz linux-6ba749ee78ef42ffdf4b95c042fc574a37d229d9.tar.bz2 linux-6ba749ee78ef42ffdf4b95c042fc574a37d229d9.zip |
mm, oom: remove redundant task_in_mem_cgroup() check
oom_unkillable_task() can be called from three different contexts i.e.
global OOM, memcg OOM and oom_score procfs interface. At the moment
oom_unkillable_task() does a task_in_mem_cgroup() check on the given
process. Since there is no reason to perform task_in_mem_cgroup()
check for global OOM and oom_score procfs interface, those contexts
provide NULL memcg and skips the task_in_mem_cgroup() check. However
for memcg OOM context, the oom_unkillable_task() is always called from
mem_cgroup_scan_tasks() and thus task_in_mem_cgroup() check becomes
redundant and effectively dead code. So, just remove the
task_in_mem_cgroup() check altogether.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190624212631.87212-2-shakeelb@google.com
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/memcontrol.c | 26 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | mm/oom_kill.c | 19 |
2 files changed, 7 insertions, 38 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 773ae5674e12..4f05735b02d3 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -1259,32 +1259,6 @@ void mem_cgroup_update_lru_size(struct lruvec *lruvec, enum lru_list lru, *lru_size += nr_pages; } -bool task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struct *task, struct mem_cgroup *memcg) -{ - struct mem_cgroup *task_memcg; - struct task_struct *p; - bool ret; - - p = find_lock_task_mm(task); - if (p) { - task_memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(p->mm); - task_unlock(p); - } else { - /* - * All threads may have already detached their mm's, but the oom - * killer still needs to detect if they have already been oom - * killed to prevent needlessly killing additional tasks. - */ - rcu_read_lock(); - task_memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(task); - css_get(&task_memcg->css); - rcu_read_unlock(); - } - ret = mem_cgroup_is_descendant(task_memcg, memcg); - css_put(&task_memcg->css); - return ret; -} - /** * mem_cgroup_margin - calculate chargeable space of a memory cgroup * @memcg: the memory cgroup diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c index 59326614508a..b353f468a36a 100644 --- a/mm/oom_kill.c +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c @@ -153,17 +153,13 @@ static inline bool is_memcg_oom(struct oom_control *oc) /* return true if the task is not adequate as candidate victim task. */ static bool oom_unkillable_task(struct task_struct *p, - struct mem_cgroup *memcg, const nodemask_t *nodemask) + const nodemask_t *nodemask) { if (is_global_init(p)) return true; if (p->flags & PF_KTHREAD) return true; - /* When mem_cgroup_out_of_memory() and p is not member of the group */ - if (memcg && !task_in_mem_cgroup(p, memcg)) - return true; - /* p may not have freeable memory in nodemask */ if (!has_intersects_mems_allowed(p, nodemask)) return true; @@ -194,20 +190,19 @@ static bool is_dump_unreclaim_slabs(void) * oom_badness - heuristic function to determine which candidate task to kill * @p: task struct of which task we should calculate * @totalpages: total present RAM allowed for page allocation - * @memcg: task's memory controller, if constrained * @nodemask: nodemask passed to page allocator for mempolicy ooms * * The heuristic for determining which task to kill is made to be as simple and * predictable as possible. The goal is to return the highest value for the * task consuming the most memory to avoid subsequent oom failures. */ -unsigned long oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, +unsigned long oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, const nodemask_t *nodemask, unsigned long totalpages) { long points; long adj; - if (oom_unkillable_task(p, memcg, nodemask)) + if (oom_unkillable_task(p, nodemask)) return 0; p = find_lock_task_mm(p); @@ -318,7 +313,7 @@ static int oom_evaluate_task(struct task_struct *task, void *arg) struct oom_control *oc = arg; unsigned long points; - if (oom_unkillable_task(task, NULL, oc->nodemask)) + if (oom_unkillable_task(task, oc->nodemask)) goto next; /* @@ -342,7 +337,7 @@ static int oom_evaluate_task(struct task_struct *task, void *arg) goto select; } - points = oom_badness(task, NULL, oc->nodemask, oc->totalpages); + points = oom_badness(task, oc->nodemask, oc->totalpages); if (!points || points < oc->chosen_points) goto next; @@ -387,7 +382,7 @@ static int dump_task(struct task_struct *p, void *arg) struct oom_control *oc = arg; struct task_struct *task; - if (oom_unkillable_task(p, NULL, oc->nodemask)) + if (oom_unkillable_task(p, oc->nodemask)) return 0; task = find_lock_task_mm(p); @@ -1084,7 +1079,7 @@ bool out_of_memory(struct oom_control *oc) check_panic_on_oom(oc); if (!is_memcg_oom(oc) && sysctl_oom_kill_allocating_task && - current->mm && !oom_unkillable_task(current, NULL, oc->nodemask) && + current->mm && !oom_unkillable_task(current, oc->nodemask) && current->signal->oom_score_adj != OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN) { get_task_struct(current); oc->chosen = current; |