diff options
author | Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> | 2018-10-15 17:38:23 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> | 2018-10-22 10:28:22 +0200 |
commit | 0d9c1ab3be4c0187663096a6a084421d0a1e45c6 (patch) | |
tree | 06a57638913d5badd76fe695bcb4f08992f55579 /net/ceph/msgpool.c | |
parent | 26f887e0a3c43f67b550e2e5d8a76e86ca11d188 (diff) | |
download | linux-0d9c1ab3be4c0187663096a6a084421d0a1e45c6.tar.gz linux-0d9c1ab3be4c0187663096a6a084421d0a1e45c6.tar.bz2 linux-0d9c1ab3be4c0187663096a6a084421d0a1e45c6.zip |
libceph: preallocate message data items
Currently message data items are allocated with ceph_msg_data_create()
in setup_request_data() inside send_request(). send_request() has never
been allowed to fail, so each allocation is followed by a BUG_ON:
data = ceph_msg_data_create(...);
BUG_ON(!data);
It's been this way since support for multiple message data items was
added in commit 6644ed7b7e04 ("libceph: make message data be a pointer")
in 3.10.
There is no reason to delay the allocation of message data items until
the last possible moment and we certainly don't need a linked list of
them as they are only ever appended to the end and never erased. Make
ceph_msg_new2() take max_data_items and adapt the rest of the code.
Reported-by: Jerry Lee <leisurelysw24@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ceph/msgpool.c')
-rw-r--r-- | net/ceph/msgpool.c | 25 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/net/ceph/msgpool.c b/net/ceph/msgpool.c index 3dddc074f0d7..e3ecb80cd182 100644 --- a/net/ceph/msgpool.c +++ b/net/ceph/msgpool.c @@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ static void *msgpool_alloc(gfp_t gfp_mask, void *arg) struct ceph_msgpool *pool = arg; struct ceph_msg *msg; - msg = ceph_msg_new(pool->type, pool->front_len, gfp_mask, true); + msg = ceph_msg_new2(pool->type, pool->front_len, pool->max_data_items, + gfp_mask, true); if (!msg) { dout("msgpool_alloc %s failed\n", pool->name); } else { @@ -35,11 +36,13 @@ static void msgpool_free(void *element, void *arg) } int ceph_msgpool_init(struct ceph_msgpool *pool, int type, - int front_len, int size, bool blocking, const char *name) + int front_len, int max_data_items, int size, + const char *name) { dout("msgpool %s init\n", name); pool->type = type; pool->front_len = front_len; + pool->max_data_items = max_data_items; pool->pool = mempool_create(size, msgpool_alloc, msgpool_free, pool); if (!pool->pool) return -ENOMEM; @@ -53,18 +56,21 @@ void ceph_msgpool_destroy(struct ceph_msgpool *pool) mempool_destroy(pool->pool); } -struct ceph_msg *ceph_msgpool_get(struct ceph_msgpool *pool, - int front_len) +struct ceph_msg *ceph_msgpool_get(struct ceph_msgpool *pool, int front_len, + int max_data_items) { struct ceph_msg *msg; - if (front_len > pool->front_len) { - dout("msgpool_get %s need front %d, pool size is %d\n", - pool->name, front_len, pool->front_len); + if (front_len > pool->front_len || + max_data_items > pool->max_data_items) { + pr_warn_ratelimited("%s need %d/%d, pool %s has %d/%d\n", + __func__, front_len, max_data_items, pool->name, + pool->front_len, pool->max_data_items); WARN_ON_ONCE(1); /* try to alloc a fresh message */ - return ceph_msg_new(pool->type, front_len, GFP_NOFS, false); + return ceph_msg_new2(pool->type, front_len, max_data_items, + GFP_NOFS, false); } msg = mempool_alloc(pool->pool, GFP_NOFS); @@ -80,6 +86,9 @@ void ceph_msgpool_put(struct ceph_msgpool *pool, struct ceph_msg *msg) msg->front.iov_len = pool->front_len; msg->hdr.front_len = cpu_to_le32(pool->front_len); + msg->data_length = 0; + msg->num_data_items = 0; + kref_init(&msg->kref); /* retake single ref */ mempool_free(msg, pool->pool); } |