diff options
| author | Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> | 2011-05-02 20:21:35 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2011-05-05 11:10:14 -0700 |
| commit | 228e548e602061b08ee8e8966f567c12aa079682 (patch) | |
| tree | 4c79ecf071d6174d42da1557812a4646d0aaa5af /net/compat.c | |
| parent | 1c5cae815d19ffe02bdfda1260949ef2b1806171 (diff) | |
| download | linux-228e548e602061b08ee8e8966f567c12aa079682.tar.gz linux-228e548e602061b08ee8e8966f567c12aa079682.tar.bz2 linux-228e548e602061b08ee8e8966f567c12aa079682.zip | |
net: Add sendmmsg socket system call
This patch adds a multiple message send syscall and is the send
version of the existing recvmmsg syscall. This is heavily
based on the patch by Arnaldo that added recvmmsg.
I wrote a microbenchmark to test the performance gains of using
this new syscall:
http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/sendmmsg_test.c
The test was run on a ppc64 box with a 10 Gbit network card. The
benchmark can send both UDP and RAW ethernet packets.
64B UDP
batch pkts/sec
1 804570
2 872800 (+ 8 %)
4 916556 (+14 %)
8 939712 (+17 %)
16 952688 (+18 %)
32 956448 (+19 %)
64 964800 (+20 %)
64B raw socket
batch pkts/sec
1 1201449
2 1350028 (+12 %)
4 1461416 (+22 %)
8 1513080 (+26 %)
16 1541216 (+28 %)
32 1553440 (+29 %)
64 1557888 (+30 %)
We see a 20% improvement in throughput on UDP send and 30%
on raw socket send.
[ Add sparc syscall entries. -DaveM ]
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/compat.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/compat.c | 16 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/net/compat.c b/net/compat.c index 3649d5895361..c578d9382e19 100644 --- a/net/compat.c +++ b/net/compat.c @@ -722,11 +722,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(compat_mc_getsockopt); /* Argument list sizes for compat_sys_socketcall */ #define AL(x) ((x) * sizeof(u32)) -static unsigned char nas[20] = { +static unsigned char nas[21] = { AL(0), AL(3), AL(3), AL(3), AL(2), AL(3), AL(3), AL(3), AL(4), AL(4), AL(4), AL(6), AL(6), AL(2), AL(5), AL(5), AL(3), AL(3), - AL(4), AL(5) + AL(4), AL(5), AL(4) }; #undef AL @@ -735,6 +735,13 @@ asmlinkage long compat_sys_sendmsg(int fd, struct compat_msghdr __user *msg, uns return sys_sendmsg(fd, (struct msghdr __user *)msg, flags | MSG_CMSG_COMPAT); } +asmlinkage long compat_sys_sendmmsg(int fd, struct compat_mmsghdr __user *mmsg, + unsigned vlen, unsigned int flags) +{ + return __sys_sendmmsg(fd, (struct mmsghdr __user *)mmsg, vlen, + flags | MSG_CMSG_COMPAT); +} + asmlinkage long compat_sys_recvmsg(int fd, struct compat_msghdr __user *msg, unsigned int flags) { return sys_recvmsg(fd, (struct msghdr __user *)msg, flags | MSG_CMSG_COMPAT); @@ -780,7 +787,7 @@ asmlinkage long compat_sys_socketcall(int call, u32 __user *args) u32 a[6]; u32 a0, a1; - if (call < SYS_SOCKET || call > SYS_RECVMMSG) + if (call < SYS_SOCKET || call > SYS_SENDMMSG) return -EINVAL; if (copy_from_user(a, args, nas[call])) return -EFAULT; @@ -839,6 +846,9 @@ asmlinkage long compat_sys_socketcall(int call, u32 __user *args) case SYS_SENDMSG: ret = compat_sys_sendmsg(a0, compat_ptr(a1), a[2]); break; + case SYS_SENDMMSG: + ret = compat_sys_sendmmsg(a0, compat_ptr(a1), a[2], a[3]); + break; case SYS_RECVMSG: ret = compat_sys_recvmsg(a0, compat_ptr(a1), a[2]); break; |