diff options
| author | Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> | 2019-07-01 10:38:39 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2019-07-08 16:22:55 +0200 |
| commit | 600c70bad6594cb124c641ed05355ca134650ea4 (patch) | |
| tree | 64b117309f808caca760fc11a37284880654eda3 /net/core | |
| parent | d2850ce0bdd772a85043b1f07af99205b96e6e2a (diff) | |
| download | linux-600c70bad6594cb124c641ed05355ca134650ea4.tar.gz linux-600c70bad6594cb124c641ed05355ca134650ea4.tar.bz2 linux-600c70bad6594cb124c641ed05355ca134650ea4.zip | |
bpf: allow wide (u64) aligned stores for some fields of bpf_sock_addr
Since commit cd17d7770578 ("bpf/tools: sync bpf.h") clang decided
that it can do a single u64 store into user_ip6[2] instead of two
separate u32 ones:
# 17: (18) r2 = 0x100000000000000
# ; ctx->user_ip6[2] = bpf_htonl(DST_REWRITE_IP6_2);
# 19: (7b) *(u64 *)(r1 +16) = r2
# invalid bpf_context access off=16 size=8
>From the compiler point of view it does look like a correct thing
to do, so let's support it on the kernel side.
Credit to Andrii Nakryiko for a proper implementation of
bpf_ctx_wide_store_ok.
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Fixes: cd17d7770578 ("bpf/tools: sync bpf.h")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/core')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/core/filter.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c index 089aaea0ccc6..4481e950f020 100644 --- a/net/core/filter.c +++ b/net/core/filter.c @@ -6890,6 +6890,16 @@ static bool sock_addr_is_valid_access(int off, int size, if (!bpf_ctx_narrow_access_ok(off, size, size_default)) return false; } else { + if (bpf_ctx_wide_store_ok(off, size, + struct bpf_sock_addr, + user_ip6)) + return true; + + if (bpf_ctx_wide_store_ok(off, size, + struct bpf_sock_addr, + msg_src_ip6)) + return true; + if (size != size_default) return false; } @@ -7730,9 +7740,6 @@ static u32 xdp_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type, /* SOCK_ADDR_STORE_NESTED_FIELD_OFF() has semantic similar to * SOCK_ADDR_LOAD_NESTED_FIELD_SIZE_OFF() but for store operation. * - * It doesn't support SIZE argument though since narrow stores are not - * supported for now. - * * In addition it uses Temporary Field TF (member of struct S) as the 3rd * "register" since two registers available in convert_ctx_access are not * enough: we can't override neither SRC, since it contains value to store, nor @@ -7740,7 +7747,7 @@ static u32 xdp_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type, * instructions. But we need a temporary place to save pointer to nested * structure whose field we want to store to. */ -#define SOCK_ADDR_STORE_NESTED_FIELD_OFF(S, NS, F, NF, OFF, TF) \ +#define SOCK_ADDR_STORE_NESTED_FIELD_OFF(S, NS, F, NF, SIZE, OFF, TF) \ do { \ int tmp_reg = BPF_REG_9; \ if (si->src_reg == tmp_reg || si->dst_reg == tmp_reg) \ @@ -7751,8 +7758,7 @@ static u32 xdp_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type, offsetof(S, TF)); \ *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(S, F), tmp_reg, \ si->dst_reg, offsetof(S, F)); \ - *insn++ = BPF_STX_MEM( \ - BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(NS, NF), tmp_reg, si->src_reg, \ + *insn++ = BPF_STX_MEM(SIZE, tmp_reg, si->src_reg, \ bpf_target_off(NS, NF, FIELD_SIZEOF(NS, NF), \ target_size) \ + OFF); \ @@ -7764,8 +7770,8 @@ static u32 xdp_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type, TF) \ do { \ if (type == BPF_WRITE) { \ - SOCK_ADDR_STORE_NESTED_FIELD_OFF(S, NS, F, NF, OFF, \ - TF); \ + SOCK_ADDR_STORE_NESTED_FIELD_OFF(S, NS, F, NF, SIZE, \ + OFF, TF); \ } else { \ SOCK_ADDR_LOAD_NESTED_FIELD_SIZE_OFF( \ S, NS, F, NF, SIZE, OFF); \ |