summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>2019-08-27 10:13:46 +0100
committerDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>2019-08-27 10:13:46 +0100
commitd0d5c0cd1e711c98703f3544c1e6fc1372898de5 (patch)
treee4070af80e16dca846e4734574270ff08ec65e74 /net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
parent987db9f7cd1e77e611b770a569068c43949aa6fd (diff)
downloadlinux-d0d5c0cd1e711c98703f3544c1e6fc1372898de5.tar.gz
linux-d0d5c0cd1e711c98703f3544c1e6fc1372898de5.tar.bz2
linux-d0d5c0cd1e711c98703f3544c1e6fc1372898de5.zip
rxrpc: Use skb_unshare() rather than skb_cow_data()
The in-place decryption routines in AF_RXRPC's rxkad security module currently call skb_cow_data() to make sure the data isn't shared and that the skb can be written over. This has a problem, however, as the softirq handler may be still holding a ref or the Rx ring may be holding multiple refs when skb_cow_data() is called in rxkad_verify_packet() - and so skb_shared() returns true and __pskb_pull_tail() dislikes that. If this occurs, something like the following report will be generated. kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:1463! ... RIP: 0010:pskb_expand_head+0x253/0x2b0 ... Call Trace: __pskb_pull_tail+0x49/0x460 skb_cow_data+0x6f/0x300 rxkad_verify_packet+0x18b/0xb10 [rxrpc] rxrpc_recvmsg_data.isra.11+0x4a8/0xa10 [rxrpc] rxrpc_kernel_recv_data+0x126/0x240 [rxrpc] afs_extract_data+0x51/0x2d0 [kafs] afs_deliver_fs_fetch_data+0x188/0x400 [kafs] afs_deliver_to_call+0xac/0x430 [kafs] afs_wait_for_call_to_complete+0x22f/0x3d0 [kafs] afs_make_call+0x282/0x3f0 [kafs] afs_fs_fetch_data+0x164/0x300 [kafs] afs_fetch_data+0x54/0x130 [kafs] afs_readpages+0x20d/0x340 [kafs] read_pages+0x66/0x180 __do_page_cache_readahead+0x188/0x1a0 ondemand_readahead+0x17d/0x2e0 generic_file_read_iter+0x740/0xc10 __vfs_read+0x145/0x1a0 vfs_read+0x8c/0x140 ksys_read+0x4a/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x43/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Fix this by using skb_unshare() instead in the input path for DATA packets that have a security index != 0. Non-DATA packets don't need in-place encryption and neither do unencrypted DATA packets. Fixes: 248f219cb8bc ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code") Reported-by: Julian Wollrath <jwollrath@web.de> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h')
-rw-r--r--net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h1
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h b/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
index 2d5294f3e62f..852e58781fda 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
+++ b/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
@@ -1110,6 +1110,7 @@ void rxrpc_kernel_data_consumed(struct rxrpc_call *, struct sk_buff *);
void rxrpc_packet_destructor(struct sk_buff *);
void rxrpc_new_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
void rxrpc_see_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
+void rxrpc_eaten_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
void rxrpc_get_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
void rxrpc_free_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
void rxrpc_purge_queue(struct sk_buff_head *);