summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJeremy Sowden <jeremy@azazel.net>2022-03-27 23:36:25 +0100
committerPablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>2022-03-29 23:33:46 +0200
commit31818213170caa51d116eb5dc1167b88523b4fe1 (patch)
tree28eae9229951fcc7d54edce9b416e0fdfc0b6502 /net
parentad7da1ce5749c0eb4f09dd7e5510123be56f10fb (diff)
downloadlinux-31818213170caa51d116eb5dc1167b88523b4fe1.tar.gz
linux-31818213170caa51d116eb5dc1167b88523b4fe1.tar.bz2
linux-31818213170caa51d116eb5dc1167b88523b4fe1.zip
netfilter: bitwise: fix reduce comparisons
The `nft_bitwise_reduce` and `nft_bitwise_fast_reduce` functions should compare the bitwise operation in `expr` with the tracked operation associated with the destination register of `expr`. However, instead of being called on `expr` and `track->regs[priv->dreg].selector`, `nft_expr_priv` is called on `expr` twice, so both reduce functions return true even when the operations differ. Fixes: be5650f8f47e ("netfilter: nft_bitwise: track register operations") Signed-off-by: Jeremy Sowden <jeremy@azazel.net> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net')
-rw-r--r--net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c b/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c
index 38caa66632b4..f590ee1c8a1b 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_bitwise.c
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ static bool nft_bitwise_reduce(struct nft_regs_track *track,
if (!track->regs[priv->sreg].selector)
return false;
- bitwise = nft_expr_priv(expr);
+ bitwise = nft_expr_priv(track->regs[priv->dreg].selector);
if (track->regs[priv->sreg].selector == track->regs[priv->dreg].selector &&
track->regs[priv->sreg].num_reg == 0 &&
track->regs[priv->dreg].bitwise &&
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ static bool nft_bitwise_fast_reduce(struct nft_regs_track *track,
if (!track->regs[priv->sreg].selector)
return false;
- bitwise = nft_expr_priv(expr);
+ bitwise = nft_expr_priv(track->regs[priv->dreg].selector);
if (track->regs[priv->sreg].selector == track->regs[priv->dreg].selector &&
track->regs[priv->dreg].bitwise &&
track->regs[priv->dreg].bitwise->ops == expr->ops &&