diff options
| author | Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> | 2020-11-13 13:12:41 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> | 2020-11-13 18:37:22 +0100 |
| commit | 02a9c6ee4183af2e438454c55098b828a96085fb (patch) | |
| tree | b3b8ec8748d4255fb458a8f7be991caf5b3d219b /sound/firewire | |
| parent | 95a793c3bc75cf888e0e641d656e7d080f487d8b (diff) | |
| download | linux-02a9c6ee4183af2e438454c55098b828a96085fb.tar.gz linux-02a9c6ee4183af2e438454c55098b828a96085fb.tar.bz2 linux-02a9c6ee4183af2e438454c55098b828a96085fb.zip | |
ALSA: firewire: Clean up a locking issue in copy_resp_to_buf()
The spin_lock/unlock_irq() functions cannot be nested. The problem is
that presumably we would want the IRQs to be re-enabled on the second
call the spin_unlock_irq() but instead it will be enabled at the first
call so IRQs will be enabled earlier than expected.
In this situation the copy_resp_to_buf() function is only called from
one function and it is called with IRQs disabled. We can just use
the regular spin_lock/unlock() functions.
Fixes: 555e8a8f7f14 ("ALSA: fireworks: Add command/response functionality into hwdep interface")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113101241.GB168908@mwanda
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'sound/firewire')
| -rw-r--r-- | sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks_transaction.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks_transaction.c b/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks_transaction.c index 0f533f5bd960..9f8c53b39f95 100644 --- a/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks_transaction.c +++ b/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks_transaction.c @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ copy_resp_to_buf(struct snd_efw *efw, void *data, size_t length, int *rcode) t = (struct snd_efw_transaction *)data; length = min_t(size_t, be32_to_cpu(t->length) * sizeof(u32), length); - spin_lock_irq(&efw->lock); + spin_lock(&efw->lock); if (efw->push_ptr < efw->pull_ptr) capacity = (unsigned int)(efw->pull_ptr - efw->push_ptr); @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ handle_resp_for_user(struct fw_card *card, int generation, int source, copy_resp_to_buf(efw, data, length, rcode); end: - spin_unlock_irq(&instances_lock); + spin_unlock(&instances_lock); } static void |