diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/rtmutex.c | 240 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/rtmutex_common.h | 8 |
2 files changed, 195 insertions, 53 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/rtmutex.c b/kernel/rtmutex.c index 69d9cb921ffa..fec77e7e0562 100644 --- a/kernel/rtmutex.c +++ b/kernel/rtmutex.c @@ -300,7 +300,8 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, * assigned pending owner [which might not have taken the * lock yet]: */ -static inline int try_to_steal_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock) +static inline int try_to_steal_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, + struct task_struct *task) { struct task_struct *pendowner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); struct rt_mutex_waiter *next; @@ -309,11 +310,11 @@ static inline int try_to_steal_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock) if (!rt_mutex_owner_pending(lock)) return 0; - if (pendowner == current) + if (pendowner == task) return 1; spin_lock_irqsave(&pendowner->pi_lock, flags); - if (current->prio >= pendowner->prio) { + if (task->prio >= pendowner->prio) { spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pendowner->pi_lock, flags); return 0; } @@ -338,21 +339,21 @@ static inline int try_to_steal_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock) * We are going to steal the lock and a waiter was * enqueued on the pending owners pi_waiters queue. So * we have to enqueue this waiter into - * current->pi_waiters list. This covers the case, - * where current is boosted because it holds another + * task->pi_waiters list. This covers the case, + * where task is boosted because it holds another * lock and gets unboosted because the booster is * interrupted, so we would delay a waiter with higher - * priority as current->normal_prio. + * priority as task->normal_prio. * * Note: in the rare case of a SCHED_OTHER task changing * its priority and thus stealing the lock, next->task - * might be current: + * might be task: */ - if (likely(next->task != current)) { - spin_lock_irqsave(¤t->pi_lock, flags); - plist_add(&next->pi_list_entry, ¤t->pi_waiters); - __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(¤t->pi_lock, flags); + if (likely(next->task != task)) { + spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags); + plist_add(&next->pi_list_entry, &task->pi_waiters); + __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); } return 1; } @@ -389,7 +390,7 @@ static int try_to_take_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock) */ mark_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); - if (rt_mutex_owner(lock) && !try_to_steal_lock(lock)) + if (rt_mutex_owner(lock) && !try_to_steal_lock(lock, current)) return 0; /* We got the lock. */ @@ -411,6 +412,7 @@ static int try_to_take_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock) */ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, + struct task_struct *task, int detect_deadlock) { struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); @@ -418,21 +420,21 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, unsigned long flags; int chain_walk = 0, res; - spin_lock_irqsave(¤t->pi_lock, flags); - __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current); - waiter->task = current; + spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags); + __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task); + waiter->task = task; waiter->lock = lock; - plist_node_init(&waiter->list_entry, current->prio); - plist_node_init(&waiter->pi_list_entry, current->prio); + plist_node_init(&waiter->list_entry, task->prio); + plist_node_init(&waiter->pi_list_entry, task->prio); /* Get the top priority waiter on the lock */ if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); plist_add(&waiter->list_entry, &lock->wait_list); - current->pi_blocked_on = waiter; + task->pi_blocked_on = waiter; - spin_unlock_irqrestore(¤t->pi_lock, flags); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags); if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) { spin_lock_irqsave(&owner->pi_lock, flags); @@ -460,7 +462,7 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); res = rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, detect_deadlock, lock, waiter, - current); + task); spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); @@ -605,37 +607,25 @@ void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task) rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, 0, NULL, NULL, task); } -/* - * Slow path lock function: +/** + * __rt_mutex_slowlock() - Perform the wait-wake-try-to-take loop + * @lock: the rt_mutex to take + * @state: the state the task should block in (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE + * or TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) + * @timeout: the pre-initialized and started timer, or NULL for none + * @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter + * @detect_deadlock: passed to task_blocks_on_rt_mutex + * + * lock->wait_lock must be held by the caller. */ static int __sched -rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, - struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, - int detect_deadlock) +__rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, + struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, + int detect_deadlock) { - struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter; int ret = 0; - debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(&waiter); - waiter.task = NULL; - - spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); - - /* Try to acquire the lock again: */ - if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock)) { - spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); - return 0; - } - - set_current_state(state); - - /* Setup the timer, when timeout != NULL */ - if (unlikely(timeout)) { - hrtimer_start_expires(&timeout->timer, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS); - if (!hrtimer_active(&timeout->timer)) - timeout->task = NULL; - } - for (;;) { /* Try to acquire the lock: */ if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock)) @@ -656,19 +646,19 @@ rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, } /* - * waiter.task is NULL the first time we come here and + * waiter->task is NULL the first time we come here and * when we have been woken up by the previous owner * but the lock got stolen by a higher prio task. */ - if (!waiter.task) { - ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, &waiter, + if (!waiter->task) { + ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, current, detect_deadlock); /* * If we got woken up by the owner then start loop * all over without going into schedule to try * to get the lock now: */ - if (unlikely(!waiter.task)) { + if (unlikely(!waiter->task)) { /* * Reset the return value. We might * have returned with -EDEADLK and the @@ -684,15 +674,52 @@ rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); - debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(&waiter); + debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(waiter); - if (waiter.task) + if (waiter->task) schedule_rt_mutex(lock); spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); set_current_state(state); } + return ret; +} + +/* + * Slow path lock function: + */ +static int __sched +rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, + struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, + int detect_deadlock) +{ + struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter; + int ret = 0; + + debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(&waiter); + waiter.task = NULL; + + spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); + + /* Try to acquire the lock again: */ + if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock)) { + spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + return 0; + } + + set_current_state(state); + + /* Setup the timer, when timeout != NULL */ + if (unlikely(timeout)) { + hrtimer_start_expires(&timeout->timer, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS); + if (!hrtimer_active(&timeout->timer)) + timeout->task = NULL; + } + + ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, state, timeout, &waiter, + detect_deadlock); + set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); if (unlikely(waiter.task)) @@ -986,6 +1013,59 @@ void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, } /** + * rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() - Start lock acquisition for another task + * @lock: the rt_mutex to take + * @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter + * @task: the task to prepare + * @detect_deadlock: perform deadlock detection (1) or not (0) + * + * Returns: + * 0 - task blocked on lock + * 1 - acquired the lock for task, caller should wake it up + * <0 - error + * + * Special API call for FUTEX_REQUEUE_PI support. + */ +int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, + struct task_struct *task, int detect_deadlock) +{ + int ret; + + spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); + + mark_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); + + if (!rt_mutex_owner(lock) || try_to_steal_lock(lock, task)) { + /* We got the lock for task. */ + debug_rt_mutex_lock(lock); + + rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, task, 0); + + rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, task); + return 1; + } + + ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, detect_deadlock); + + + if (ret && !waiter->task) { + /* + * Reset the return value. We might have + * returned with -EDEADLK and the owner + * released the lock while we were walking the + * pi chain. Let the waiter sort it out. + */ + ret = 0; + } + spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + + debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(waiter); + + return ret; +} + +/** * rt_mutex_next_owner - return the next owner of the lock * * @lock: the rt lock query @@ -1004,3 +1084,57 @@ struct task_struct *rt_mutex_next_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock) return rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)->task; } + +/** + * rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock() - Complete lock acquisition + * @lock: the rt_mutex we were woken on + * @to: the timeout, null if none. hrtimer should already have + * been started. + * @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter + * @detect_deadlock: perform deadlock detection (1) or not (0) + * + * Complete the lock acquisition started our behalf by another thread. + * + * Returns: + * 0 - success + * <0 - error, one of -EINTR, -ETIMEDOUT, or -EDEADLK + * + * Special API call for PI-futex requeue support + */ +int rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, + struct hrtimer_sleeper *to, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, + int detect_deadlock) +{ + int ret; + + spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock); + + set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); + + ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, to, waiter, + detect_deadlock); + + set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); + + if (unlikely(waiter->task)) + remove_waiter(lock, waiter); + + /* + * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. We might + * have to fix that up. + */ + fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); + + spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); + + /* + * Readjust priority, when we did not get the lock. We might have been + * the pending owner and boosted. Since we did not take the lock, the + * PI boost has to go. + */ + if (unlikely(ret)) + rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current); + + return ret; +} diff --git a/kernel/rtmutex_common.h b/kernel/rtmutex_common.h index e124bf5800ea..97a2f81866af 100644 --- a/kernel/rtmutex_common.h +++ b/kernel/rtmutex_common.h @@ -120,6 +120,14 @@ extern void rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *proxy_owner); extern void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *proxy_owner); +extern int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, + struct task_struct *task, + int detect_deadlock); +extern int rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, + struct hrtimer_sleeper *to, + struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, + int detect_deadlock); #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES # include "rtmutex-debug.h" |