| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cancellation of an in-progress operation needs to update the relevant counters
and start any operations that are pending waiting on this one.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Count and display through /proc/fs/fscache/stats the number of initialised
operations.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Out of line fscache_operation_init() so that it can access internal FS-Cache
features, such as stats, in a later commit.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, fscache_cancel_op() only cancels pending operations - attempts to
cancel in-progress operations are ignored. This leads to a problem in
fscache_wait_for_operation_activation() whereby the wait is terminated, but
the object has been killed.
The check at the end of the function now triggers because it's no longer
contingent on the cache having produced an I/O error since the commit that
fixed the logic error in fscache_object_is_dead().
The result of the check is that it tries to cancel the operation - but since
the object may not be pending by this point, the cancellation request may be
ignored - with the result that the the object is just put by the caller and
fscache_put_operation has an assertion failure because the operation isn't in
either the COMPLETE or the CANCELLED states.
To fix this, we permit in-progress ops to be cancelled under some
circumstances.
The bug results in an oops that looks something like this:
FS-Cache: fscache_wait_for_operation_activation() = -ENOBUFS [obj dead 3]
FS-Cache:
FS-Cache: Assertion failed
FS-Cache: 3 == 5 is false
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at ../fs/fscache/operation.c:432!
...
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa0088574>] fscache_put_operation+0xf2/0x2cd
Call Trace:
[<ffffffffa008b92a>] __fscache_read_or_alloc_pages+0x2ec/0x3b3
[<ffffffffa00b761f>] __nfs_readpages_from_fscache+0x59/0xbf [nfs]
[<ffffffffa00b06c5>] nfs_readpages+0x10c/0x185 [nfs]
[<ffffffff81124925>] ? alloc_pages_current+0x119/0x13e
[<ffffffff810ee5fd>] ? __page_cache_alloc+0xfb/0x10a
[<ffffffff810f87f8>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x188/0x22c
[<ffffffff810f8b3a>] ondemand_readahead+0x29e/0x2af
[<ffffffff810f8c92>] page_cache_sync_readahead+0x38/0x3a
[<ffffffff810ef337>] generic_file_read_iter+0x1a2/0x55a
[<ffffffffa00a9dff>] ? nfs_revalidate_mapping+0xd6/0x288 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa00a6a23>] nfs_file_read+0x49/0x70 [nfs]
[<ffffffff811363be>] new_sync_read+0x78/0x9c
[<ffffffff81137164>] __vfs_read+0x13/0x38
[<ffffffff8113721e>] vfs_read+0x95/0x121
[<ffffffff811372f6>] SyS_read+0x4c/0x8a
[<ffffffff81557a52>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fscache_object_is_dead() returns true only if the object is marked dead and
the cache got an I/O error. This should be a logical OR instead. Since two
of the callers got split up into handling for separate subcases, expand the
other callers and kill the function. This is probably the right thing to do
anyway since one of the subcases isn't about the object at all, but rather
about the cache.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When an object is being marked as no longer live, do this under the object
spinlock to prevent a race with operation submission targeted on that object.
The problem occurs due to the following pair of intertwined sequences when the
cache tries to create an object that would take it over the hard available
space limit:
NETFS INTERFACE
===============
(A) The netfs calls fscache_acquire_cookie(). object creation is deferred to
the object state machine and the netfs is allowed to continue.
OBJECT STATE MACHINE KTHREAD
============================
(1) The object is looked up on disk by fscache_look_up_object()
calling cachefiles_walk_to_object(). The latter finds that the
object is not yet represented on disk and calls
fscache_object_lookup_negative().
(2) fscache_object_lookup_negative() sets FSCACHE_COOKIE_NO_DATA_YET
and clears FSCACHE_COOKIE_LOOKING_UP, thus allowing the netfs to
start queuing read operations.
(B) The netfs calls fscache_read_or_alloc_pages(). This calls
fscache_wait_for_deferred_lookup() which sees FSCACHE_COOKIE_LOOKING_UP
become clear, allowing the read to begin.
(C) A read operation is set up and passed to fscache_submit_op() to deal
with.
(3) cachefiles_walk_to_object() calls cachefiles_has_space(), which
fails (or one of the file operations to create stuff fails).
cachefiles returns an error to fscache.
(4) fscache_look_up_object() transits to the LOOKUP_FAILURE state,
(5) fscache_lookup_failure() sets FSCACHE_OBJECT_LOOKED_UP and
FSCACHE_COOKIE_UNAVAILABLE and clears FSCACHE_COOKIE_LOOKING_UP
then transits to the KILL_OBJECT state.
(6) fscache_kill_object() clears FSCACHE_OBJECT_IS_LIVE in an attempt
to reject any further requests from the netfs.
(7) object->n_ops is examined and found to be 0.
fscache_kill_object() transits to the DROP_OBJECT state.
(D) fscache_submit_op() locks the object spinlock, sees if it can dispatch
the op immediately by calling fscache_object_is_active() - which fails
since FSCACHE_OBJECT_IS_AVAILABLE has not yet been set.
(E) fscache_submit_op() then tests FSCACHE_OBJECT_LOOKED_UP - which is set.
It then queues the object and increments object->n_ops.
(8) fscache_drop_object() releases the object and eventually
fscache_put_object() calls cachefiles_put_object() which suffers
an assertion failure here:
ASSERTCMP(object->fscache.n_ops, ==, 0);
Locking the object spinlock in step (6) around the clearance of
FSCACHE_OBJECT_IS_LIVE ensures that the the decision trees in
fscache_submit_op() and fscache_submit_exclusive_op() don't see the IS_LIVE
flag being cleared mid-decision: either the op is queued before step (7) - in
which case fscache_kill_object() will see n_ops>0 and will deal with the op -
or the op will be rejected.
This, combined with rejecting op submission if the target object is dying, fix
the problem.
The problem shows up as the following oops:
CacheFiles: Assertion failed
CacheFiles: 1 == 0 is false
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at ../fs/cachefiles/interface.c:339!
...
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa014fd9c>] [<ffffffffa014fd9c>] cachefiles_put_object+0x2a4/0x301 [cachefiles]
...
Call Trace:
[<ffffffffa008674b>] fscache_put_object+0x18/0x21 [fscache]
[<ffffffffa00883e6>] fscache_object_work_func+0x3ba/0x3c9 [fscache]
[<ffffffff81054dad>] process_one_work+0x226/0x441
[<ffffffff81055d91>] worker_thread+0x273/0x36b
[<ffffffff81055b1e>] ? rescuer_thread+0x2e1/0x2e1
[<ffffffff81059b9d>] kthread+0x10e/0x116
[<ffffffff81059a8f>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x1bb/0x1bb
[<ffffffff815579ac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[<ffffffff81059a8f>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x1bb/0x1bb
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reject new operations that are being submitted against an object if that
object has failed its lookup or creation states or has been killed by the
cache backend for some other reason, such as having been culled.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When submitting an operation, prefer to cancel the operation immediately
rather than queuing it for later processing if the object is marked as dying
(ie. the object state machine has reached the KILL_OBJECT state).
Whilst we're at it, change the series of related test_bit() calls into a
READ_ONCE() and bitwise-AND operators to reduce the number of load
instructions (test_bit() has a volatile address).
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Move fscache_report_unexpected_submission() up within operation.c so that it
can be called from fscache_submit_exclusive_op() too.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Count the number of objects that get culled by the cache backend and the
number of objects that the cache backend declines to instantiate due to lack
of space in the cache.
These numbers are made available through /proc/fs/fscache/stats
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Pull file locking fixes from Jeff Layton:
"A small set of patches to fix problems with the recent file locking
changes that we discussed earlier this week"
"
* tag 'locks-v3.20-2' of git://git.samba.org/jlayton/linux:
locks: fix list insertion when lock is split in two
locks: remove conditional lock release in middle of flock_lock_file
locks: only remove leases associated with the file being closed
Revert "locks: keep a count of locks on the flctx lists"
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
In the case where we're splitting a lock in two, the current code
the new "left" lock in the incorrect spot. It's inserted just
before "right" when it should instead be inserted just before the
new lock.
When we add a new lock, set "fl" to that value so that we can
add "left" before it.
Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
As Linus pointed out:
Say we have an existing flock, and now do a new one that conflicts. I
see what looks like three separate bugs.
- We go through the first loop, find a lock of another type, and
delete it in preparation for replacing it
- we *drop* the lock context spinlock.
- BUG #1? So now there is no lock at all, and somebody can come in
and see that unlocked state. Is that really valid?
- another thread comes in while the first thread dropped the lock
context lock, and wants to add its own lock. It doesn't see the
deleted or pending locks, so it just adds it
- the first thread gets the context spinlock again, and adds the lock
that replaced the original
- BUG #2? So now there are *two* locks on the thing, and the next
time you do an unlock (or when you close the file), it will only
remove/replace the first one.
...remove the "drop the spinlock" code in the middle of this function as
it has always been suspicious. This should eliminate the potential race
that can leave two locks for the same struct file on the list.
He also pointed out another thing as a bug -- namely that you
flock_lock_file removes the lock from the list unconditionally when
doing a lock upgrade, without knowing whether it'll be able to set the
new lock. Bruce pointed out that this is expected behavior and may help
prevent certain deadlock situations.
We may want to revisit that at some point, but it's probably best that
we do so in the context of a different patchset.
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We don't want to remove all leases just because one filp was closed.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This reverts commit 9bd0f45b7037fcfa8b575c7e27d0431d6e6dc3bb.
Linus rightly pointed out that I failed to initialize the counters
when adding them, so they don't work as expected. Just revert this
patch for now.
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
|
| |\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/asm-generic
Pull asm-generic uaccess.h cleanup from Arnd Bergmann:
"Like in 3.19, I once more have a multi-stage cleanup for one
asm-generic header file, this time the work was done by Michael
Tsirkin and cleans up the uaccess.h file in asm-generic, as well as
all architectures for which the respective maintainers did not pick up
his patches directly"
* tag 'asm-generic-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arnd/asm-generic: (37 commits)
sparc32: nocheck uaccess coding style tweaks
sparc64: nocheck uaccess coding style tweaks
xtensa: macro whitespace fixes
sh: macro whitespace fixes
parisc: macro whitespace fixes
m68k: macro whitespace fixes
m32r: macro whitespace fixes
frv: macro whitespace fixes
cris: macro whitespace fixes
avr32: macro whitespace fixes
arm64: macro whitespace fixes
arm: macro whitespace fixes
alpha: macro whitespace fixes
blackfin: macro whitespace fixes
sparc64: uaccess_64 macro whitespace fixes
sparc32: uaccess_32 macro whitespace fixes
avr32: whitespace fix
sh: fix put_user sparse errors
metag: fix put_user sparse errors
ia64: fix put_user sparse errors
...
|
| | |\ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost into asm-generic
Merge "uaccess: fix sparse warning on get/put_user for bitwise types" from Michael S. Tsirkin:
At the moment, if p and x are both tagged as bitwise types,
some of get_user(x, p), put_user(x, p), __get_user(x, p), __put_user(x, p)
might produce a sparse warning on many architectures.
This is a false positive: *p on these architectures is loaded into long
(typically using asm), then cast back to typeof(*p).
When typeof(*p) is a bitwise type (which is uncommon), such a cast needs
__force, otherwise sparse produces a warning.
Some architectures already have the __force tag, add it
where it's missing.
I verified that adding these __force casts does not supress any useful warnings.
Specifically, vhost wants to read/write bitwise types in userspace memory
using get_user/put_user.
At the moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
For example:
__le32 __user *p;
__u32 x;
both
put_user(x, p);
and
get_user(x, p);
should be safe, but produce warnings on some architectures.
While there, I noticed that a bunch of architectures violated
coding style rules within uaccess macros.
Included patches to fix them up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
* tag 'uaccess_for_upstream' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost: (37 commits)
sparc32: nocheck uaccess coding style tweaks
sparc64: nocheck uaccess coding style tweaks
xtensa: macro whitespace fixes
sh: macro whitespace fixes
parisc: macro whitespace fixes
m68k: macro whitespace fixes
m32r: macro whitespace fixes
frv: macro whitespace fixes
cris: macro whitespace fixes
avr32: macro whitespace fixes
arm64: macro whitespace fixes
arm: macro whitespace fixes
alpha: macro whitespace fixes
blackfin: macro whitespace fixes
sparc64: uaccess_64 macro whitespace fixes
sparc32: uaccess_32 macro whitespace fixes
avr32: whitespace fix
sh: fix put_user sparse errors
metag: fix put_user sparse errors
ia64: fix put_user sparse errors
...
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Sam Ravnborg suggested packing single-lines cases in switch statements
in nocheck uaccess macros makes for easier to read code.
Suggested-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Sam Ravnborg suggested packing single-lines cases in switch statements
in nocheck uaccess macros makes for easier to read code.
Suggested-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
While working on arch/xtensa/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that some macros within this header are made harder to read because they
violate a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
While working on arch/sh/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that one macro within this header is made harder to read because it
violates a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
While working on arch/parisc/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that some macros within this header are made harder to read because they
violate a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
While working on arch/m68k/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that one macro within this header is made harder to read because it
violates a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
While working on arch/m32r/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that some macros within this header are made harder to read because they
violate a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
While working on arch/frv/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that one macro within this header is made harder to read because it
violates a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
While working on arch/cris/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that some macros within this header are made harder to read because they
violate a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
While working on arch/avr32/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that some macros within this header are made harder to read because they
violate a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
While working on arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that one macro within this header is made harder to read because it
violates a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
While working on arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that some macros within this header are made harder to read because they
violate a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
While working on arch/alpha/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that some macros within this header are made harder to read because they
violate a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
While working on arch/blackfin/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that some macros within this header are made harder to read because they
violate a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Macros within arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess_64.h are made harder to
read because they violate a bunch of coding style rules.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Macros within arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess_32.h are made harder to
read because they violate a bunch of coding style rules.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Align using tabs to make code prettier.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
virtio wants to write bitwise types to userspace using put_user.
At the moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed
through an integer.
For example:
__le32 __user *p;
__le32 x;
put_user(x, p);
is safe, but currently triggers a sparse warning.
Fix that up using __force.
Note: this does not suppress any useful sparse checks since caller
assigns x to typeof(*p), which in turn forces all the necessary type
checks.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
virtio wants to write bitwise types to userspace using put_user.
At the moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed
through an integer.
For example:
__le32 __user *p;
__le32 x;
put_user(x, p);
is safe, but currently triggers a sparse warning.
Fix that up using __force.
This also fixes warnings due to writing a pointer out to
userland.
Note: this does not suppress any useful sparse checks since callers
do a cast (__typeof__(*(ptr))) (x) which in turn forces all the
necessary type checks.
Suggested-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
virtio wants to write bitwise types to userspace using put_user.
At the moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed
through an integer.
For example:
__le32 __user *p;
__le32 x;
put_user(x, p);
is safe, but currently triggers a sparse warning.
Fix that up using __force.
Note: this does not suppress any useful sparse checks since callers
do a cast (__typeof__(*(ptr))) (x) which in turn forces all the
necessary type checks.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
virtio wants to write bitwise types to userspace using put_user.
At the moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed
through an integer.
For example:
__le32 __user *p;
__le32 x;
put_user(x, p);
is safe, but currently triggers a sparse warning.
Fix that up using __force.
Note: this does not suppress any useful sparse checks since caller
assigns x to typeof(*p), which in turn forces all the necessary type
checks.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
virtio wants to write bitwise types to userspace using put_user.
At the moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed
through an integer.
For example:
__le32 __user *p;
__le32 x;
put_user(x, p);
is safe, but currently triggers a sparse warning.
Fix that up using __force.
Note: this does not suppress any useful sparse checks since caller
assigns x to typeof(*p), which in turn forces all the necessary type
checks.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>
|
