summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/x86/include/asm/nops.h
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* x86/alternatives: Add longer 64-bit NOPsPeter Zijlstra2023-05-311-2/+14
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | By adding support for longer NOPs there are a few more alternatives that can turn into a single instruction. Add up to NOP11, the same limit where GNU as .nops also stops generating longer nops. This is because a number of uarchs have severe decode penalties for more than 3 prefixes. [ bp: Sync up with the version in tools/ while at it. ] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230515093020.661756940@infradead.org
* x86/asm: Use _ASM_BYTES() in <asm/nops.h>H. Peter Anvin (Intel)2021-05-101-14/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | Use the new generalized _ASM_BYTES() macro from <asm/asm.h> instead of the "home grown" _ASM_MK_NOP() in <asm/nops.h>. Add <asm/asm.h> and update <asm/nops.h> in the tools directory... Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210510090940.924953-4-hpa@zytor.com
* x86: Remove dynamic NOP selectionPeter Zijlstra2021-03-151-121/+55
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This ensures that a NOP is a NOP and not a random other instruction that is also a NOP. It allows simplification of dynamic code patching that wants to verify existing code before writing new instructions (ftrace, jump_label, static_call, etc..). Differentiating on NOPs is not a feature. This pessimises 32bit (DONTCARE) and 32bit on 64bit CPUs (CARELESS). 32bit is not a performance target. Everything x86_64 since AMD K10 (2007) and Intel IvyBridge (2012) is fine with using NOPL (as opposed to prefix NOP). And per FEATURE_NOPL being required for x86_64, all x86_64 CPUs can use NOPL. So stop caring about NOPs, simplify things and get on with life. [ The problem seems to be that some uarchs can only decode NOPL on a single front-end port while others have severe decode penalties for excessive prefixes. All modern uarchs can handle both, except Atom, which has prefix penalties. ] [ Also, much doubt you can actually measure any of this on normal workloads. ] After this, FEATURE_NOPL is unused except for required-features for x86_64. FEATURE_K8 is only used for PTI. [ bp: Kernel build measurements showed ~0.3s slowdown on Sandybridge which is hardly a slowdown. Get rid of X86_FEATURE_K7, while at it. ] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> # bpf Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210312115749.065275711@infradead.org
* License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no licenseGreg Kroah-Hartman2017-11-021-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* x86, nop: Make the ASM_NOP* macros work from assemblyH. Peter Anvin2012-04-191-0/+4
| | | | | | | Make the ASM_NOP* macros work in actual assembly files. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1334794610-5546-2-git-send-email-hpa@zytor.com
* x86, cpu: Clean up and unify the NOP selection infrastructureH. Peter Anvin2011-04-181-62/+84
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Clean up and unify the NOP selection infrastructure: - Make the atomic 5-byte NOP a part of the selection system. - Pick NOPs once during early boot and then be done with it. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1303166160-10315-3-git-send-email-hpa@linux.intel.com
* x86: Fix common misspellingsLucas De Marchi2011-03-181-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | They were generated by 'codespell' and then manually reviewed. Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi> Cc: trivial@kernel.org LKML-Reference: <1300389856-1099-3-git-send-email-lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* x86/tracing: comment need for atomic nopSteven Rostedt2009-09-101-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The dynamic function tracer relys on the macro P6_NOP5 always being an atomic NOP. If for some reason it is changed to be two operations (like a nop2 nop3) it can faults within the kernel when the function tracer modifies the code. This patch adds a comment to note that the P6_NOPs are expected to be atomic. This will hopefully prevent anyone from changing that. Reported-by: Mathieu Desnoyer <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
* x86: Fix ASM_X86__ header guardsH. Peter Anvin2008-10-221-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | Change header guards named "ASM_X86__*" to "_ASM_X86_*" since: a. the double underscore is ugly and pointless. b. no leading underscore violates namespace constraints. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
* x86, um: ... and asm-x86 moveAl Viro2008-10-221-0/+118
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>