| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
arch/x86/kernel/apic_32.c
arch/x86/kernel/apic_64.c
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
include/asm-x86/cpufeature.h
include/asm-x86/dma-mapping.h
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This section mismatch:
>> Seems to be a section mismatch; init_intel() is __cpuinit while
>> numaq_tsc_disable() is __init. Seems to be introduced in:
>>
>> commit 64898a8bad8c94ad7a4bd5cc86b66edfbb081f4a
>> Author: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat Jul 19 18:01:16 2008 -0700
>>
>> x86: extend and use x86_quirks to clean up NUMAQ code
>
> Oops, I am wrong about numaq_tsc_disable() being __init. Still, I
> believe that Yinghai might be able to say what's really wrong :-)
Would lead to this crash:
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at c08a45f0
IP: [<c08a45f0>] numaq_tsc_disable+0x0/0x40
Fixed by the patch below.
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
so NUMAQ can use that to call numaq_pre_time_init()
This allows us to remove a NUMAQ special from arch/x86/kernel/setup.c.
(and paves the way to remove the NUMAQ subarch)
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
add these new x86_quirks methods:
int *mpc_record;
int (*mpc_apic_id)(struct mpc_config_processor *m);
void (*mpc_oem_bus_info)(struct mpc_config_bus *m, char *name);
void (*mpc_oem_pci_bus)(struct mpc_config_bus *m);
void (*smp_read_mpc_oem)(struct mp_config_oemtable *oemtable,
unsigned short oemsize);
... and move NUMAQ related mps table handling to numaq_32.c.
also move the call to smp_read_mpc_oem() to smp_read_mpc() directly.
Should not change functionality, albeit it would be nice to get it
tested on real NUMAQ as well ...
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fix:
arch/x86/kernel/numaq_32.c: In function ‘numaq_tsc_disable’:
arch/x86/kernel/numaq_32.c:99: warning: ‘return’ with a value, in function returning void
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
got this on a test-system:
calling numaq_tsc_disable+0x0/0x39
NUMAQ: disabling TSC
initcall numaq_tsc_disable+0x0/0x39 returned 0 after 0 msecs
that's because we should not be using arch_initcall to call numaq_tsc_disable.
need to call it in setup_arch before time_init()/tsc_init()
and call it in init_intel() to make the cpu feature bits right.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
... so it could fall back to normal numa and we'd reduce the impact of the
NUMAQ subarch.
NUMAQ depends on GENERICARCH
also decouple genericarch numa from acpi.
also make it fall back to bigsmp if apicid > 8.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
this way 32-bit is more similar to 64-bit, and smarter e820 and numa.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
so we could fall back to one node numa.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix from: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
