| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Reformat balance_leaf_insert_right to adhere to CodingStyle.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Break up balance_leaf_paste_left into:
balance_leaf_paste_left_shift
balance_leaf_paste_left_shift_dirent
balance_leaf_paste_left_whole
and keep balance_leaf_paste_left as a handler to select which is appropriate.
Also reformat to adhere to CodingStyle.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Reformat balance_leaf_insert_left to adhere to CodingStyle.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
new_nodes, finish_node}
Break out the code that splits paste/insert for each phase.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
This patch factors out a new balance_leaf_finish_node_paste from the code
in balance_leaf responsible for pasting new content into existing items
held in S[0].
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
This patch factors out a new balance_leaf_finish_node_insert from the code
in balance_leaf responsible for inserting new items into S[0]
It has not been reformatted yet.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
This patch factors out a new balance_leaf_new_nodes_insert from the code
in balance_leaf responsible for pasting new content into existing items
that may have been shifted into new nodes in the tree.
It has not been reformatted yet.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
This patch factors out a new balance_leaf_new_nodes_insert from the code
in balance_leaf responsible for inserting new items into new nodes in
the tree.
It has not been reformatted yet.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
This patch factors out a new balance_leaf_paste_right from the code in
balance_leaf responsible for pasting new contents into an existing item
located in the node to the right of S[0] in the tree.
It has not been reformatted yet.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
This patch factors out a new balance_leaf_insert_right from the code in
balance_leaf responsible for inserting new items into the node to
the right of S[0] in the tree.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
This patch factors out a new balance_leaf_paste_left from the code in
balance_leaf responsible for pasting new content into an existing item
located in the node to the left of S[0] in the tree.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
This patch factors out a new balance_leaf_insert_left from the code in
balance_leaf responsible for inserting new items into the node to
the left of S[0] in the tree.
It is not yet formatted correctly.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
This patch pushes the rest of the state variables in balance_leaf into
the tree_balance structure so we can use them when we split balance_leaf
into separate functions.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
The comments in balance_leaf are as bad as the code. This patch shifts
them around to fit in 80 columns and be easier to read.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
The hash detection code uses long ugly macros multiple times to get the same
value. This patch cleans it up to be easier to read.
[JK: Fixed up path leak in find_hash_out()]
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
The reiserfs code is littered with extra parens in places where the authors
may not have been certain about precedence of & vs ->. This patch cleans them
out.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
This patch moves reiserfs closer to adhering to the style rules by
removing leading whitespace from labels.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
make_empty_dir_item_v1 and make_empty_dir_item also needed a bit of cleanup
but it's clearer to use separate pointers rather than the array positions
for just two items.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
journal_join is always called with a block count of 1. Let's just get
rid of the argument.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
journal_mark_dirty doesn't need a separate sb argument; It's provided
by the transaction handle.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
journal_end doesn't need a separate sb argument; it's provided by the
transaction handle.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
journal_end takes a block count argument but doesn't actually use it
for anything. We can remove it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
This patch reformats comments in the reiserfs code to fit in 80 columns and
to follow the style rules.
There is no functional change but it helps make my eyes bleed less.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
This patch does a quick search and replace:
B_N_PITEM_HEAD() -> item_head()
B_N_PDELIM_KEY() -> internal_key()
B_N_PKEY() -> leaf_key()
B_N_PITEM() -> item_body()
And the item_head version:
B_I_PITEM() -> ih_item_body()
I_ENTRY_COUNT() -> ih_entry_count()
And the treepath variants:
get_ih() -> tp_item_head()
PATH_PITEM_HEAD() -> tp_item_head()
get_item() -> tp_item_body()
... which makes the code much easier on the eyes.
I've also removed a few unused macros.
Checkpatch will complain about the 80 character limit for do_balan.c.
I've addressed that in a later patchset to split up balance_leaf().
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| | |/ / / / / / /
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
The reiserfs write lock hasn't been the BKL for some time. There's no
need to have different file systems queued up on the same workqueue.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | |_|_|_|_|/ /
| |/| | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs
Pull btrfs updates from Chris Mason:
"The biggest change here is Josef's rework of the btrfs quota
accounting, which improves the in-memory tracking of delayed extent
operations.
I had been working on Btrfs stack usage for a while, mostly because it
had become impossible to do long stress runs with slab, lockdep and
pagealloc debugging turned on without blowing the stack. Even though
you upgraded us to a nice king sized stack, I kept most of the
patches.
We also have some very hard to find corruption fixes, an awesome sysfs
use after free, and the usual assortment of optimizations, cleanups
and other fixes"
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: (80 commits)
Btrfs: convert smp_mb__{before,after}_clear_bit
Btrfs: fix scrub_print_warning to handle skinny metadata extents
Btrfs: make fsync work after cloning into a file
Btrfs: use right type to get real comparison
Btrfs: don't check nodes for extent items
Btrfs: don't release invalid page in btrfs_page_exists_in_range()
Btrfs: make sure we retry if page is a retriable exception
Btrfs: make sure we retry if we couldn't get the page
btrfs: replace EINVAL with EOPNOTSUPP for dev_replace raid56
trivial: fs/btrfs/ioctl.c: fix typo s/substract/subtract/
Btrfs: fix leaf corruption after __btrfs_drop_extents
Btrfs: ensure btrfs_prev_leaf doesn't miss 1 item
Btrfs: fix clone to deal with holes when NO_HOLES feature is enabled
btrfs: free delayed node outside of root->inode_lock
btrfs: replace EINVAL with ERANGE for resize when ULLONG_MAX
Btrfs: fix transaction leak during fsync call
btrfs: Avoid trucating page or punching hole in a already existed hole.
Btrfs: update commit root on snapshot creation after orphan cleanup
Btrfs: ioctl, don't re-lock extent range when not necessary
Btrfs: avoid visiting all extent items when cloning a range
...
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
The new call is smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic. The __ gives us extra
protection from the atomic rays.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
The skinny extents are intepreted incorrectly in scrub_print_warning(),
and end up hitting the BUG() in btrfs_extent_inline_ref_size.
Reported-by: Konstantinos Skarlatos <k.skarlatos@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
When cloning into a file, we were correctly replacing the extent
items in the target range and removing the extent maps. However
we weren't replacing the extent maps with new ones that point to
the new extents - as a consequence, an incremental fsync (when the
inode doesn't have the full sync flag) was a NOOP, since it relies
on the existence of extent maps in the modified list of the inode's
extent map tree, which was empty. Therefore add new extent maps to
reflect the target clone range.
A test case for xfstests follows.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
We want to make sure the point is still within the extent item, not to verify
the memory it's pointing to.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
The backref code was looking at nodes as well as leaves when we tried to
populate extent item entries. This is not good, and although we go away with it
for the most part because we'd skip where disk_bytenr != random_memory,
sometimes random_memory would match and suddenly boom. This fixes that problem.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
In inode.c:btrfs_page_exists_in_range(), if the page we got from
the radix tree is an exception entry, which can't be retried, we
exit the loop with a non-NULL page and then call page_cache_release
against it, which is not ok since it's not a valid page. This could
also make us return true when we shouldn't.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
In inode.c:btrfs_page_exists_in_range(), if the page we get from the
radix tree is an exception which should make us retry, set page to
NULL in order to really retry, because otherwise we don't get another
loop iteration executed (page != NULL makes the while loop exit).
This also was making us call page_cache_release after exiting the loop,
which isn't correct because page doesn't point to a valid page, and
possibly return true from the function when we shouldn't.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
In inode.c:btrfs_page_exists_in_range(), if we can't get the page
we need to retry. However we weren't retrying because we weren't
setting page to NULL, which makes the while loop exit immediately
and will make us call page_cache_release after exiting the loop
which is incorrect because our page get didn't succeed. This could
also make us return true when we shouldn't.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
To return EOPNOTSUPP is more user friendly than to return EINVAL,
and then user-space tool will show that the dev_replace operation
for raid56 is not currently supported rather than showing that
there is an invalid argument.
Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ao2@ao2.it>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Several reports about leaf corruption has been floating on the list, one of them
points to __btrfs_drop_extents(), and we find that the leaf becomes corrupted
after __btrfs_drop_extents(), it's really a rare case but it does exist.
The problem turns out to be btrfs_next_leaf() called in __btrfs_drop_extents().
So in btrfs_next_leaf(), we release the current path to re-search the last key of
the leaf for locating next leaf, and we've taken it into account that there might
be balance operations between leafs during this 'unlock and re-lock' dance, so
we check the path again and advance it if there are now more items available.
But things are a bit different if that last key happens to be removed and balance
gets a bigger key as the last one, and btrfs_search_slot will return it with
ret > 0, IOW, nothing change in this leaf except the new last key, then we think
we're okay because there is no more item balanced in, fine, we thinks we can
go to the next leaf.
However, we should return that bigger key, otherwise we deserve leaf corruption,
for example, in endio, skipping that key means that __btrfs_drop_extents() thinks
it has dropped all extent matched the required range and finish_ordered_io can
safely insert a new extent, but it actually doesn't and ends up a leaf
corruption.
One may be asking that why our locking on extent io tree doesn't work as
expected, ie. it should avoid this kind of race situation. But in
__btrfs_drop_extents(), we don't always find extents which are included within
our locking range, IOW, extents can start before our searching start, in this
case locking on extent io tree doesn't protect us from the race.
This takes the special case into account.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
We might have had an item with the previous key in the tree right
before we released our path. And after we released our path, that
item might have been pushed to the first slot (0) of the leaf we
were holding due to a tree balance. Alternatively, an item with the
previous key can exist as the only element of a leaf (big fat item).
Therefore account for these 2 cases, so that our callers (like
btrfs_previous_item) don't miss an existing item with a key matching
the previous key we computed above.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
If the NO_HOLES feature is enabled holes don't have file extent items in
the btree that represent them anymore. This made the clone operation
ignore the gaps that exist between consecutive file extent items and
therefore not create the holes at the destination. When not using the
NO_HOLES feature, the holes were created at the destination.
A test case for xfstests follows.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
On heavy workloads, we're seeing soft lockup warnings on
root->inode_lock in __btrfs_release_delayed_node. The low hanging fruit
is to reduce the size of the critical section.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
To be accurate about the error case,
if the new size is beyond ULLONG_MAX, return ERANGE instead of EINVAL.
Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
If btrfs_log_dentry_safe() returns an error, we set ret to 1 and
fall through with the goal of committing the transaction. However,
in the case where the inode doesn't need a full sync, we would call
btrfs_wait_ordered_range() against the target range for our inode,
and if it returned an error, we would return without commiting or
ending the transaction.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
btrfs_punch_hole() will truncate unaligned pages or punch hole on a
already existed hole.
This will cause unneeded zero page or holes splitting the original huge
hole.
This patch will skip already existed holes before any page truncating or
hole punching.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
On snapshot creation (either writable or read-only), we do orphan cleanup
against the root of the snapshot. If the cleanup did remove any orphans,
then the current root node will be different from the commit root node
until the next transaction commit happens.
A send operation always uses the commit root of a snapshot - this means
it will see the orphans if it starts computing the send stream before the
next transaction commit happens (triggered by a timer or sync() for .e.g),
which is when the commit root gets assigned a reference to current root,
where the orphans are not visible anymore. The consequence of send seeing
the orphans is explained below.
For example:
mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
mount -o commit=999 /dev/sdd /mnt
# open a file with O_TMPFILE and leave it open
# write some data to the file
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/send.data
The send operation will fail with the following error:
ERROR: send ioctl failed with -116: Stale file handle
What happens here is that our snapshot has an orphan inode still visible
through the commit root, that corresponds to the tmpfile. However send
will attempt to call inode.c:btrfs_iget(), with the goal of reading the
file's data, which will return -ESTALE because it will use the current
root (and not the commit root) of the snapshot.
Of course, there are other cases where we can get orphans, but this
example using a tmpfile makes it much easier to reproduce the issue.
Therefore on snapshot creation, after calling btrfs_orphan_cleanup, if
the commit root is different from the current root, just commit the
transaction associated with the snapshot's root (if it exists), so that
a send will not see any orphans that don't exist anymore. This also
guarantees a send will always see the same content regardless of whether
a transaction commit happened already before the send was requested and
after the orphan cleanup (meaning the commit root and current roots are
the same) or it hasn't happened yet (commit and current roots are
different).
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
In ioctl.c:lock_extent_range(), after locking our target range, the
ordered extent that btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_extent() returns us
may not overlap our target range at all. In this case we would just
unlock our target range, wait for any new ordered extents that overlap
the range to complete, lock again the range and repeat all these steps
until we don't get any ordered extent and the delalloc flag isn't set
in the io tree for our target range.
Therefore just stop if we get an ordered extent that doesn't overlap
our target range and the dealalloc flag isn't set for the range in
the inode's io tree.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
When cloning a range of a file, we were visiting all the extent items in
the btree that belong to our source inode. We don't need to visit those
extent items that don't overlap the range we are cloning, as doing so only
makes us waste time and do unnecessary btree navigations (btrfs_next_leaf)
for inodes that have a large number of file extent items in the btree.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
We were setting the BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD flag on the root of the
parent of our target snapshot, instead of setting it in the target
snapshot's root.
This is easy to observe by running the following scenario:
mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
mount /dev/sdd /mnt
btrfs subvolume create /mnt/first_subvol
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1
btrfs subvolume delete /mnt/first_subvol
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2
btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 /mnt/mysnap2 -f /tmp/send.data
The send command failed because the send ioctl returned -EPERM.
A test case for xfstests follows.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
We were cleaning the clone target file range from the page cache before
we did replace the file extent items in the fs tree. This was racy,
as right after cleaning the relevant range from the page cache and before
replacing the file extent items, a read against that range could be
performed by another task and populate again the page cache with stale
data (stale after the cloning finishes). This would result in reads after
the clone operation successfully finishes to get old data (and potentially
for a very long time). Therefore evict the pages after replacing the file
extent items, so that subsequent reads will always get the new data.
Similarly, we were prone to races while cloning the file extent items
because we weren't locking the target range and wait for any existing
ordered extents against that range to complete. It was possible that
after cloning the extent items, a write operation that was performed
before the clone operation and overlaps the same range, would end up
undoing all or part of the work the clone operation did (a worker task
running inode.c:btrfs_finish_ordered_io). Therefore lock the target
range in the io tree, wait for all pending ordered extents against that
range to finish and then safely perform the cloning.
The issue of reading stale data after the clone operation is easy to
reproduce by running the following C program in a loop until it exits
with return value 1.
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include <asm/types.h>
#include <linux/ioctl.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
#define SRC_FILE "/mnt/sdd/foo"
#define DST_FILE "/mnt/sdd/bar"
#define FILE_SIZE (16 * 1024)
#define PATTERN_SRC 'X'
#define PATTERN_DST 'Y'
struct btrfs_ioctl_clone_range_args {
__s64 src_fd;
__u64 src_offset, src_length;
__u64 dest_offset;
};
#define BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC 0x94
#define BTRFS_IOC_CLONE_RANGE _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 13, \
struct btrfs_ioctl_clone_range_args)
static pthread_mutex_t mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
static int clone_done = 0;
static int reader_ready = 0;
static int stale_data = 0;
static void *reader_loop(void *arg)
{
char buf[4096], want_buf[4096];
memset(want_buf, PATTERN_SRC, 4096);
pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
reader_ready = 1;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
while (1) {
int done, fd, ret;
fd = open(DST_FILE, O_RDONLY);
assert(fd != -1);
pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
done = clone_done;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
ret = read(fd, buf, 4096);
assert(ret == 4096);
close(fd);
if (done) {
ret = memcmp(buf, want_buf, 4096);
if (ret == 0) {
printf("Found new content\n");
} else {
printf("Found old content\n");
pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
stale_data = 1;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
}
break;
}
}
return NULL;
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
pthread_t reader;
int ret, i, fd;
struct btrfs_ioctl_clone_range_args clone_args;
int fd1, fd2;
ret = remove(SRC_FILE);
if (ret == -1 && errno != ENOENT) {
fprintf(stderr, "Error deleting src file: %s\n", strerror(errno));
return 1;
}
ret = remove(DST_FILE);
if (ret == -1 && errno != ENOENT) {
fprintf(stderr, "Error deleting dst file: %s\n", strerror(errno));
return 1;
}
fd = open(SRC_FILE, O_CREAT | O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC, S_IRWXU);
assert(fd != -1);
for (i = 0; i < FILE_SIZE; i++) {
char c = PATTERN_SRC;
ret = write(fd, &c, 1);
assert(ret == 1);
}
close(fd);
fd = open(DST_FILE, O_CREAT | O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC, S_IRWXU);
assert(fd != -1);
for (i = 0; i < FILE_SIZE; i++) {
char c = PATTERN_DST;
ret = write(fd, &c, 1);
assert(ret == 1);
}
close(fd);
sync();
ret = pthread_create(&reader, NULL, reader_loop, NULL);
assert(ret == 0);
while (1) {
int r;
pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
r = reader_ready;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
if (r) break;
}
fd1 = open(SRC_FILE, O_RDONLY);
if (fd1 < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "Error open src file: %s\n", strerror(errno));
return 1;
}
fd2 = open(DST_FILE, O_RDWR);
if (fd2 < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "Error open dst file: %s\n", strerror(errno));
return 1;
}
clone_args.src_fd = fd1;
clone_args.src_offset = 0;
clone_args.src_length = 4096;
clone_args.dest_offset = 0;
ret = ioctl(fd2, BTRFS_IOC_CLONE_RANGE, &clone_args);
assert(ret == 0);
close(fd1);
close(fd2);
pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
clone_done = 1;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
ret = pthread_join(reader, NULL);
assert(ret == 0);
pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex);
ret = stale_data ? 1 : 0;
pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex);
return ret;
}
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
There is otherwise a risk of a possible null pointer dereference.
Was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
We are currently allocating space_info objects in an array when we
allocate space_info. When a user does something like:
# btrfs balance start -mconvert=raid1 -dconvert=raid1 /mnt
# btrfs balance start -mconvert=single -dconvert=single /mnt -f
# btrfs balance start -mconvert=raid1 -dconvert=raid1 /
We can end up with memory corruption since the kobject hasn't
been reinitialized properly and the name pointer was left set.
The rationale behind allocating them statically was to avoid
creating a separate kobject container that just contained the
raid type. It used the index in the array to determine the index.
Ultimately, though, this wastes more memory than it saves in all
but the most complex scenarios and introduces kobject lifetime
questions.
This patch allocates the kobjects dynamically instead. Note that
we also remove the kobject_get/put of the parent kobject since
kobject_add and kobject_del do that internally.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
|
