summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include/linux/property.h
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* include/linux/property.h: fix typo/compile errorJohn Youn2016-09-301-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This fixes commit d76eebfa175e ("include/linux/property.h: fix build issues with gcc-4.4.4"). With that commit we get the following compile error when using the PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER_ARRAY macro. include/linux/property.h:201:39: error: `u32_data' undeclared (first use in this function) PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER_ARRAY(_name_, u32, _val_) ^ include/linux/property.h:193:17: note: in definition of macro `PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER_ARRAY' { .pointer = { _type_##_data = _val_ } }, \ ^ This needs a '.' to reference the union member. It seems this was just overlooked here since it is done correctly in similar constructs in other parts of the original commit. This fix is in preparation of upcoming commits that will use this macro. Fixes: commit d76eebfa175e ("include/linux/property.h: fix build issues with gcc-4.4.4") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2de3b929290d88a723ed829a3e3cbd02044714df.1475114627.git.johnyoun@synopsys.com Signed-off-by: John Youn <johnyoun@synopsys.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* device property: Add function to search for named child of deviceAdam Thomson2016-06-261-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For device nodes in both DT and ACPI, it possible to have named child nodes which contain properties (an existing example being gpio-leds). This adds a function to find a named child node for a device which can be used by drivers for property retrieval. For DT data node name matching, of_node_cmp() and similar functions are made available outside of CONFIG_OF block so the new function can reference these for DT and non-DT builds. For ACPI data node name matching, a helper function is also added which returns false if CONFIG_ACPI is not set, otherwise it performs a string comparison on the data node name. This avoids using the acpi_data_node struct for non CONFIG_ACPI builds, which would otherwise cause a build failure. Signed-off-by: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com> Acked-by: Sathyanarayana Nujella <sathyanarayana.nujella@intel.com> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
* device property: don't bother the drivers with struct property_setHeikki Krogerus2016-04-091-12/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Since device_add_property_set() now always takes a copy of the property_set, and also since the fwnode type is always hard coded to be FWNODE_PDATA, there is no need for the drivers to deliver the entire struct property_set. The function can just create the instance of it on its own and bind the properties from the drivers to it on the spot. This renames device_add_property_set() to device_add_properties(). The function now takes struct property_entry as its parameter instead of struct property_set. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* device property: add spaces to PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING macroAndy Shevchenko2016-01-011-1/+1
| | | | | | | Just a style fix, no functional changes. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* include/linux/property.h: fix build issues with gcc-4.4.4Andrew Morton2016-01-011-4/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | gcc-4.4.4 has problems with initialization of anonymous unions: drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c:30: error: unknown field 'value' specified in initializer work around this by crafting the initializers in a manner which the compiler can handle. Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* device property: Take a copy of the property setMika Westerberg2015-12-071-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | It is convenient if the property set associated with the device secondary firmware node is a copy of the original. This allows passing property set from a stack for example for devices created dynamically. This also ties the property set lifetime to the associated device. Because of that we provide new function device_remove_property_set() that is used to disassociate and release memory allocated for the property set. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* device property: improve readability of macrosAndy Shevchenko2015-12-071-2/+2
| | | | | | | There is no functional change. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* device property: helper macros for property entry creationHeikki Krogerus2015-12-071-0/+55
| | | | | | | | Marcos for easier creation of build-in property entries. Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* device property: keep single value inplaceAndy Shevchenko2015-12-071-8/+23
| | | | | | | | We may save a lot of lines of code and space by keeping single values inside the struct property_entry. Refactor the implementation to do so. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* device property: refactor built-in properties supportAndy Shevchenko2015-12-071-5/+3
| | | | | | | | | | Instead of using the type and nval fields we will use length (in bytes) of the value. The sanity check is done in the accessors. The built-in property accessors are split in the same way such as device tree. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* device property: ACPI: Remove unused DMA APIsSuthikulpanit, Suravee2015-11-071-2/+0
| | | | | | | | | | These DMA APIs are replaced with the newer versions, which return the enum dev_dma_attr. So, we can safely remove them. Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* device property: Adding DMA Attribute APIs for Generic DevicesSuthikulpanit, Suravee2015-11-071-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The function device_dma_is_coherent() does not sufficiently communicate device DMA attributes. Instead, this patch introduces device_get_dma_attr(), which returns enum dev_dma_attr. It replaces the acpi_check_dma(), which will be removed in subsequent patch. This also provides a convenient function, device_dma_supported(), to check DMA support of the specified device. Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* device property: Introducing enum dev_dma_attrSuthikulpanit, Suravee2015-11-071-0/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | A device could have one of the following DMA attributes: * DMA not supported * DMA non-coherent * DMA coherent So, this patch introduces enum dev_dma_attribute. This will be used by new APIs introduced in later patches. Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* device property: Add fwnode_property_match_string()Mika Westerberg2015-09-251-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | Sometimes it is useful to be able to extract an index of certain string value from an array of strings. A typical use case is to give a name to a DMA channel, PWM, clock and so on. Provide an implementation using unified device property accessors that follows of_property_match_string() but works for all supported fwnodes. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* Add a matching set of device_ functions for determining mac/phyJeremy Linton2015-08-131-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | OF has some helper functions for parsing MAC and PHY settings. In cases where the platform is providing this information rather than the device itself, there needs to be similar functions for ACPI. These functions are slightly modified versions of the ones in of_net which can use information provided via DT or ACPI. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* device property: Introduces device_dma_is_coherent()Suthikulpanit, Suravee2015-06-151-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, device drivers, which support both OF and ACPI, need to call two separate APIs, of_dma_is_coherent() and acpi_dma_is_coherent()) to determine device coherency attribute. This patch simplifies this process by introducing a new device property API, device_dma_is_coherent(), which calls the appropriate interface based on the booting architecture. Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* device property: Introduce firmware node type for platform dataRafael J. Wysocki2015-04-031-0/+33
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Introduce data structures and code allowing "built-in" properties to be associated with devices in such a way that they will be used by the device_property_* API if no proper firmware node (neither DT nor ACPI) is present for the given device. Each property is to be represented by a property_entry structure. An array of property_entry structures (terminated with a null entry) can be pointed to by the properties field of struct property_set that can be added as a firmware node to a struct device using device_add_property_set(). That will cause the device_property_* API to use that property_set as the source of properties if the given device does not have a DT node or an ACPI companion device object associated with it. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
* driver core / ACPI: Represent ACPI companions using fwnode_handleRafael J. Wysocki2015-03-161-10/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Now that we have struct fwnode_handle, we can use that to point to ACPI companions from struct device objects instead of pointing to struct acpi_device directly. There are two benefits from that. First, the somewhat ugly and hackish struct acpi_dev_node can be dropped and, second, the same struct fwnode_handle pointer can be used in the future to point to other (non-ACPI) firmware device node types. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
* Driver core: Unified interface for firmware node propertiesRafael J. Wysocki2014-11-041-0/+70
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add new generic routines are provided for retrieving properties from device description objects in the platform firmware in case there are no struct device objects for them (either those objects have not been created yet or they do not exist at all). The following functions are provided: fwnode_property_present() fwnode_property_read_u8() fwnode_property_read_u16() fwnode_property_read_u32() fwnode_property_read_u64() fwnode_property_read_string() fwnode_property_read_u8_array() fwnode_property_read_u16_array() fwnode_property_read_u32_array() fwnode_property_read_u64_array() fwnode_property_read_string_array() in analogy with the corresponding functions for struct device added previously. For all of them, the first argument is a pointer to struct fwnode_handle (new type) that allows a device description object (depending on what platform firmware interface is in use) to be obtained. Add a new macro device_for_each_child_node() for iterating over the children of the device description object associated with a given device and a new function device_get_child_node_count() returning the number of a given device's child nodes. The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. Suggested-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* Driver core: Unified device properties interface for platform firmwareRafael J. Wysocki2014-11-041-0/+73
Add a uniform interface by which device drivers can request device properties from the platform firmware by providing a property name and the corresponding data type. The purpose of it is to help to write portable code that won't depend on any particular platform firmware interface. The following general helper functions are added: device_property_present() device_property_read_u8() device_property_read_u16() device_property_read_u32() device_property_read_u64() device_property_read_string() device_property_read_u8_array() device_property_read_u16_array() device_property_read_u32_array() device_property_read_u64_array() device_property_read_string_array() The first one allows the caller to check if the given property is present. The next 5 of them allow single-valued properties of various types to be retrieved in a uniform way. The remaining 5 are for reading properties with multiple values (arrays of either numbers or strings). The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. This change set includes material from Mika Westerberg and Aaron Lu. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>