summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include/linux/rcu_segcblist.h
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* rcu: Remove kfree_rcu() special casing and lazy-callback handlingJoel Fernandes (Google)2020-01-241-2/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit removes kfree_rcu() special-casing and the lazy-callback handling from Tree RCU. It moves some of this special casing to Tiny RCU, the removal of which will be the subject of later commits. This results in a nice negative delta. Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> [ paulmck: Add slab.h #include, thanks to kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>. ] Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
* rcu/nocb: Atomic ->len field in rcu_segcblist structurePaul E. McKenney2019-08-131-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | Upcoming ->nocb_lock contention-reduction work requires that the rcu_segcblist structure's ->len field be concurrently manipulated, but only if there are no-CBs CPUs in the kernel. This commit therefore makes this ->len field be an atomic_long_t, but only in CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=y kernels. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
* rcu/nocb: Use separate flag to indicate offloaded ->cblistPaul E. McKenney2019-08-131-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | RCU callback processing currently uses rcu_is_nocb_cpu() to determine whether or not the current CPU's callbacks are to be offloaded. This works, but it is not so good for cache locality. Plus use of ->cblist for offloaded callbacks will greatly increase the frequency of these checks. This commit therefore adds a ->offloaded flag to the rcu_segcblist structure to provide a more flexible and cache-friendly means of checking for callback offloading. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
* rcu/nocb: Use separate flag to indicate disabled ->cblistPaul E. McKenney2019-08-131-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | NULLing the RCU_NEXT_TAIL pointer was a clever way to save a byte, but forward-progress considerations would require that this pointer be both NULL and non-NULL, which, absent a quantum-computer port of the Linux kernel, simply won't happen. This commit therefore creates as separate ->enabled flag to replace the current NULL checks. [ paulmck: Add include files per 0day test robot and -next. ] Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
* linux/rcu_segcblist: Convert to SPDX license identifierPaul E. McKenney2019-02-091-15/+2
| | | | | | | | | Replace the license boiler plate with a SPDX license identifier. While in the area, update an email address. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> [ paulmck: Update .h SPDX format per Joe Perches. ] Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
* rcu: Flag need for rcu_node_tree.h and rcu_segcblist.h visibilityPaul E. McKenney2017-06-081-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | The rcu_node_tree.h and rcu_segcblist.h header files in the include/linux directory might appear at first sight to be internal to the RCU implementation. However, the definitions in these files are needed to determine the size of TREE SRCU's srcu_struct structure, so they must be externally visible, which is why they live in include/linux. This commit adds comments to this effect to those files. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
* srcu: Debloat the <linux/rcu_segcblist.h> headerIngo Molnar2017-05-021-625/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Linus noticed that the <linux/rcu_segcblist.h> has huge inline functions which should not be inline at all. As a first step in cleaning this up, move them all to kernel/rcu/ and only keep an absolute minimum of data type defines in the header: before: -rw-r--r-- 1 mingo mingo 22284 May 2 10:25 include/linux/rcu_segcblist.h after: -rw-r--r-- 1 mingo mingo 3180 May 2 10:22 include/linux/rcu_segcblist.h More can be done, such as uninlining the large functions, which inlining is unjustified even if it's an RCU internal matter. Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
* srcu: Parallelize callback handlingPaul E. McKenney2017-04-211-4/+38
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Peter Zijlstra proposed using SRCU to reduce mmap_sem contention [1,2], however, there are workloads that could result in a high volume of concurrent invocations of call_srcu(), which with current SRCU would result in excessive lock contention on the srcu_struct structure's ->queue_lock, which protects SRCU's callback lists. This commit therefore moves SRCU to per-CPU callback lists, thus greatly reducing contention. Because a given SRCU instance no longer has a single centralized callback list, starting grace periods and invoking callbacks are both more complex than in the single-list Classic SRCU implementation. Starting grace periods and handling callbacks are now handled using an srcu_node tree that is in some ways similar to the rcu_node trees used by RCU-bh, RCU-preempt, and RCU-sched (for example, the srcu_node tree shape is controlled by exactly the same Kconfig options and boot parameters that control the shape of the rcu_node tree). In addition, the old per-CPU srcu_array structure is now named srcu_data and contains an rcu_segcblist structure named ->srcu_cblist for its callbacks (and a spinlock to protect this). The srcu_struct gets an srcu_gp_seq that is used to associate callback segments with the corresponding completion-time grace-period number. These completion-time grace-period numbers are propagated up the srcu_node tree so that the grace-period workqueue handler can determine whether additional grace periods are needed on the one hand and where to look for callbacks that are ready to be invoked. The srcu_barrier() function must now wait on all instances of the per-CPU ->srcu_cblist. Because each ->srcu_cblist is protected by ->lock, srcu_barrier() can remotely add the needed callbacks. In theory, it could also remotely start grace periods, but in practice doing so is complex and racy. And interestingly enough, it is never necessary for srcu_barrier() to start a grace period because srcu_barrier() only enqueues a callback when a callback is already present--and it turns out that a grace period has to have already been started for this pre-existing callback. Furthermore, it is only the callback that srcu_barrier() needs to wait on, not any particular grace period. Therefore, a new rcu_segcblist_entrain() function enqueues the srcu_barrier() function's callback into the same segment occupied by the last pre-existing callback in the list. The special case where all the pre-existing callbacks are on a different list (because they are in the process of being invoked) is handled by enqueuing srcu_barrier()'s callback into the RCU_DONE_TAIL segment, relying on the done-callbacks check that takes place after all callbacks are inovked. Note that the readers use the same algorithm as before. Note that there is a separate srcu_idx that tells the readers what counter to increment. This unfortunately cannot be combined with srcu_gp_seq because they need to be incremented at different times. This commit introduces some ugly #ifdefs in rcutorture. These will go away when I feel good enough about Tree SRCU to ditch Classic SRCU. Some crude performance comparisons, courtesy of a quickly hacked rcuperf asynchronous-grace-period capability: Callback Queuing Overhead ------------------------- # CPUS Classic SRCU Tree SRCU ------ ------------ --------- 2 0.349 us 0.342 us 16 31.66 us 0.4 us 41 --------- 0.417 us The times are the 90th percentiles, a statistic that was chosen to reject the overheads of the occasional srcu_barrier() call needed to avoid OOMing the test machine. The rcuperf test hangs when running Classic SRCU at 41 CPUs, hence the line of dashes. Despite the hacks to both the rcuperf code and that statistics, this is a convincing demonstration of Tree SRCU's performance and scalability advantages. [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/309030/ [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5108281/ Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [ paulmck: Fix initialization if synchronize_srcu_expedited() called first. ]
* srcu: Use rcu_segcblist to track SRCU callbacksPaul E. McKenney2017-04-181-0/+678
This commit switches SRCU from custom-built callback queues to the new rcu_segcblist structure. This change associates grace-period sequence numbers with groups of callbacks, which will be needed for efficient processing of per-CPU callbacks. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>