summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include/net
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* net: inet_sock: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva2020-03-021-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* net: ip6_fib: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva2020-03-021-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* net: ip_fib: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva2020-03-021-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* net: mip6: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva2020-03-021-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* neighbour: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva2020-02-291-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* net: flow_offload: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva2020-02-291-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* net: dn_fib: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva2020-02-291-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* ndisc: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva2020-02-291-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* net: ipv6: mld: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva2020-02-291-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* net: lwtunnel: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva2020-02-291-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* net: ip6_route: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva2020-02-291-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* net: nexthop: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva2020-02-291-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* net: sctp: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva2020-02-291-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* net: sock_reuseport: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva2020-02-291-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* net: sched: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva2020-02-291-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-nextDavid S. Miller2020-02-291-0/+27
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Alexei Starovoitov says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2020-02-28 The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree. We've added 41 non-merge commits during the last 7 day(s) which contain a total of 49 files changed, 1383 insertions(+), 499 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) BPF and Real-Time nicely co-exist. 2) bpftool feature improvements. 3) retrieve bpf_sk_storage via INET_DIAG. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
| * bpf: INET_DIAG support in bpf_sk_storageMartin KaFai Lau2020-02-271-0/+27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch adds INET_DIAG support to bpf_sk_storage. 1. Although this series adds bpf_sk_storage diag capability to inet sk, bpf_sk_storage is in general applicable to all fullsock. Hence, the bpf_sk_storage logic will operate on SK_DIAG_* nlattr. The caller will pass in its specific nesting nlattr (e.g. INET_DIAG_*) as the argument. 2. The request will be like: INET_DIAG_REQ_SK_BPF_STORAGES (nla_nest) (defined in latter patch) SK_DIAG_BPF_STORAGE_REQ_MAP_FD (nla_put_u32) SK_DIAG_BPF_STORAGE_REQ_MAP_FD (nla_put_u32) ...... Considering there could have multiple bpf_sk_storages in a sk, instead of reusing INET_DIAG_INFO ("ss -i"), the user can select some specific bpf_sk_storage to dump by specifying an array of SK_DIAG_BPF_STORAGE_REQ_MAP_FD. If no SK_DIAG_BPF_STORAGE_REQ_MAP_FD is specified (i.e. an empty INET_DIAG_REQ_SK_BPF_STORAGES), it will dump all bpf_sk_storages of a sk. 3. The reply will be like: INET_DIAG_BPF_SK_STORAGES (nla_nest) (defined in latter patch) SK_DIAG_BPF_STORAGE (nla_nest) SK_DIAG_BPF_STORAGE_MAP_ID (nla_put_u32) SK_DIAG_BPF_STORAGE_MAP_VALUE (nla_reserve_64bit) SK_DIAG_BPF_STORAGE (nla_nest) SK_DIAG_BPF_STORAGE_MAP_ID (nla_put_u32) SK_DIAG_BPF_STORAGE_MAP_VALUE (nla_reserve_64bit) ...... 4. Unlike other INET_DIAG info of a sk which is pretty static, the size required to dump the bpf_sk_storage(s) of a sk is dynamic as the system adding more bpf_sk_storage_map. It is hard to set a static min_dump_alloc size. Hence, this series learns it at the runtime and adjust the cb->min_dump_alloc as it iterates all sk(s) of a system. The "unsigned int *res_diag_size" in bpf_sk_storage_diag_put() is for this purpose. The next patch will update the cb->min_dump_alloc as it iterates the sk(s). Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200225230421.1975729-1-kafai@fb.com
* | unix: uses an atomic type for scm files accountingPaolo Abeni2020-02-281-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | So the scm_stat_{add,del} helper can be invoked with no additional lock held. This clean-up the code a bit and will make the next patch easier. Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* | af_unix: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva2020-02-281-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* | bonding: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva2020-02-281-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* | net: mpls: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva2020-02-281-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* | NFC: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array memberGustavo A. R. Silva2020-02-272-8/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* | net: dsa: propagate resolved link config via mac_link_up()Russell King2020-02-271-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Propagate the resolved link configuration down via DSA's phylink_mac_link_up() operation to allow split PCS/MAC to work. Tested-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* | devlink: extend devlink_trap_report() to accept cookie and passJiri Pirko2020-02-251-3/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add cookie argument to devlink_trap_report() allowing driver to pass in the user cookie. Pass on the cookie down to drop monitor code. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* | drop_monitor: extend by passing cookie from driverJiri Pirko2020-02-251-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | If driver passed along the cookie, push it through Netlink. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* | devlink: add trap metadata type for cookieJiri Pirko2020-02-251-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Allow driver to indicate cookie metadata for registered traps. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* | flow_offload: pass action cookie through offload structuresJiri Pirko2020-02-251-0/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Extend struct flow_action_entry in order to hold TC action cookie specified by user inserting the action. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* | Merge tag 'mac80211-next-for-net-next-2020-02-24' of ↵David S. Miller2020-02-242-41/+91
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jberg/mac80211-next Johannes Berg says: ==================== A new set of changes: * lots of small documentation fixes, from Jérôme Pouiller * beacon protection (BIGTK) support from Jouni Malinen * some initial code for TID configuration, from Tamizh chelvam * I reverted some new API before it's actually used, because it's wrong to mix controlled port and preauth * a few other cleanups/fixes ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
| * | mac80211: Add api to support configuring TID specific configurationTamizh chelvam2020-02-241-0/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Implement drv_set_tid_config api to allow TID specific configuration and drv_reset_tid_config api to reset peer specific TID configuration. This per-TID onfiguration will be applied for all the connected stations when MAC is NULL. Signed-off-by: Tamizh chelvam <tamizhr@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1579506687-18296-7-git-send-email-tamizhr@codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
| * | nl80211: Add support to configure TID specific RTSCTS configurationTamizh chelvam2020-02-241-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch adds support to configure per TID RTSCTS control configuration to enable/disable through the NL80211_TID_CONFIG_ATTR_RTSCTS_CTRL attribute. Signed-off-by: Tamizh chelvam <tamizhr@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1579506687-18296-5-git-send-email-tamizhr@codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
| * | nl80211: Add support to configure TID specific AMPDU configurationTamizh chelvam2020-02-241-0/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch adds support to configure per TID AMPDU control configuration to enable/disable aggregation through the NL80211_TID_CONFIG_ATTR_AMPDU_CTRL attribute. Signed-off-by: Tamizh chelvam <tamizhr@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1579506687-18296-4-git-send-email-tamizhr@codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
| * | nl80211: Add support to configure TID specific retry configurationTamizh chelvam2020-02-241-0/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch adds support to configure per TID retry configuration through the NL80211_TID_CONFIG_ATTR_RETRY_SHORT and NL80211_TID_CONFIG_ATTR_RETRY_LONG attributes. This TID specific retry configuration will have more precedence than phy level configuration. Signed-off-by: Tamizh chelvam <tamizhr@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1579506687-18296-3-git-send-email-tamizhr@codeaurora.org [rebase completely on top of my previous API changes] Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
| * | nl80211: modify TID-config APIJohannes Berg2020-02-241-18/+25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Make some changes to the TID-config API: * use u16 in nl80211 (only, and restrict to using 8 bits for now), to avoid issues in the future if we ever want to use higher TIDs. * reject empty TIDs mask (via netlink policy) * change feature advertising to not use extended feature flags but have own mechanism for this, which simplifies the code * fix all variable names from 'tid' to 'tids' since it's a mask * change to cfg80211_ name prefixes, not ieee80211_ * fix some minor docs/spelling things. Change-Id: Ia234d464b3f914cdeab82f540e018855be580dce Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
| * | nl80211: Add NL command to support TID speicific configurationsTamizh chelvam2020-02-241-0/+40
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add the new NL80211_CMD_SET_TID_CONFIG command to support data TID specific configuration. Per TID configuration is passed in the nested NL80211_ATTR_TID_CONFIG attribute. This patch adds support to configure per TID noack policy through the NL80211_TID_CONFIG_ATTR_NOACK attribute. Signed-off-by: Tamizh chelvam <tamizhr@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1579506687-18296-2-git-send-email-tamizhr@codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
| * | cfg80211: Support key configuration for Beacon protection (BIGTK)Jouni Malinen2020-02-241-0/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | IEEE P802.11-REVmd/D3.0 adds support for protecting Beacon frames using a new set of keys (BIGTK; key index 6..7) similarly to the way group-addressed Robust Management frames are protected (IGTK; key index 4..5). Extend cfg80211 and nl80211 to allow the new BIGTK to be configured. Add an extended feature flag to indicate driver support for the new key index values to avoid array overflows in driver implementations and also to indicate to user space when this functionality is available. Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200222132548.20835-2-jouni@codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
| * | cfg80211: fix indentation errorsJérôme Pouiller2020-02-241-11/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200221115604.594035-10-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
| * | cfg80211: merge documentations of field "dev"Jérôme Pouiller2020-02-241-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The field "dev" was documented on two places. This patch merges the comments. Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200221115604.594035-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
| * | cfg80211: merge documentations of field "debugfsdir"Jérôme Pouiller2020-02-241-3/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The field "privid" is documented twice. Comments were more or less the same. The patch merge them. Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200221115604.594035-7-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
| * | cfg80211: drop duplicated documentation of field "reg_notifier"Jérôme Pouiller2020-02-241-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The field "reg_notifier" was already documented above the definition of struct wiphy. The comment inside the definition of the struct did not bring more information. Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200221115604.594035-6-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
| * | cfg80211: drop duplicated documentation of field "perm_addr"Jérôme Pouiller2020-02-241-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The field "perm_addr" was already documented above the definition of struct wiphy. Comments were almost identical. Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200221115604.594035-5-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
| * | cfg80211: drop duplicated documentation of field "_net"Jérôme Pouiller2020-02-241-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The field "_net" was already documented above the definition of struct wiphy. Both comments were identical. Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200221115604.594035-4-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
| * | cfg80211: drop duplicated documentation of field "registered"Jérôme Pouiller2020-02-241-2/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Field "registered" was documented three times: twice in the documentation block of struct wiphy and once inside the struct definition. This patch keep only one comment. Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200221115604.594035-3-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
| * | cfg80211: drop duplicated documentation of field "privid"Jérôme Pouiller2020-02-241-5/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The field "privid" was already documented above the definition of struct wiphy. Comments were not identical, but they said more or less the same thing. Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200221115604.594035-2-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
| * | cfg80211: drop duplicated documentation of field "probe_resp_offload"Jérôme Pouiller2020-02-241-5/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The field "probe_resp_offload" was already documented above the definition of struct wiphy. Both comments were identical. Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200221115604.594035-1-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
| * | Revert "nl80211: add src and dst addr attributes for control port tx/rx"Johannes Berg2020-02-241-2/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit 8c3ed7aa2b9ef666195b789e9b02e28383243fa8. As Jouni points out, there's really no need for this, since the RSN pre-authentication frames are normal data frames, not port control frames (locally). We can still revert this now since it hasn't actually gone beyond -next. Fixes: 8c3ed7aa2b9e ("nl80211: add src and dst addr attributes for control port tx/rx") Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200224101910.b746e263287a.I9eb15d6895515179d50964dec3550c9dc784bb93@changeid Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
| * | cfg80211: remove support for adjacent channel compensationEmmanuel Grumbach2020-02-211-7/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The only driver that used that was iwlwifi and it removed support for this. Remove the feature here as well. Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200214232336.a530de38e511.I393bc395f6037c8cca6421ed550e3072dc248aed@changeid Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
* | | net: Special handling for IP & MPLS.Martin Varghese2020-02-241-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Special handling is needed in bareudp module for IP & MPLS as they support more than one ethertypes. MPLS has 2 ethertypes. 0x8847 for MPLS unicast and 0x8848 for MPLS multicast. While decapsulating MPLS packet from UDP packet the tunnel destination IP address is checked to determine the ethertype. The ethertype of the packet will be set to 0x8848 if the tunnel destination IP address is a multicast IP address. The ethertype of the packet will be set to 0x8847 if the tunnel destination IP address is a unicast IP address. IP has 2 ethertypes.0x0800 for IPV4 and 0x86dd for IPv6. The version field of the IP header tunnelled will be checked to determine the ethertype. This special handling to tunnel additional ethertypes will be disabled by default and can be enabled using a flag called multiproto. This flag can be used only with ethertypes 0x8847 and 0x0800. Signed-off-by: Martin Varghese <martin.varghese@nokia.com> Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* | | net: UDP tunnel encapsulation module for tunnelling different protocols like ↵Martin Varghese2020-02-243-0/+31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | MPLS, IP, NSH etc. The Bareudp tunnel module provides a generic L3 encapsulation tunnelling module for tunnelling different protocols like MPLS, IP,NSH etc inside a UDP tunnel. Signed-off-by: Martin Varghese <martin.varghese@nokia.com> Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* | | devlink: add ACL generic packet trapsJiri Pirko2020-02-241-0/+9
| |/ |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add packet traps that can report packets that were dropped during ACL processing. Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* | Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-nextDavid S. Miller2020-02-213-4/+42
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Daniel Borkmann says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2020-02-21 The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree. We've added 25 non-merge commits during the last 4 day(s) which contain a total of 33 files changed, 2433 insertions(+), 161 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) Allow for adding TCP listen sockets into sock_map/hash so they can be used with reuseport BPF programs, from Jakub Sitnicki. 2) Add a new bpf_program__set_attach_target() helper for adding libbpf support to specify the tracepoint/function dynamically, from Eelco Chaudron. 3) Add bpf_read_branch_records() BPF helper which helps use cases like profile guided optimizations, from Daniel Xu. 4) Enable bpf_perf_event_read_value() in all tracing programs, from Song Liu. 5) Relax BTF mandatory check if only used for libbpf itself e.g. to process BTF defined maps, from Andrii Nakryiko. 6) Move BPF selftests -mcpu compilation attribute from 'probe' to 'v3' as it has been observed that former fails in envs with low memlock, from Yonghong Song. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-18 15:45:38 +0000