summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/test_overflow.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* test_overflow: fix an IS_ERR() vs NULL bugDan Carpenter2018-06-121-1/+1
| | | | | | | | root_device_register() returns error pointers, it never returns NULL. Fixes: ca90800a91ba ("test_overflow: Add memory allocation overflow tests") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
* test_overflow: Add memory allocation overflow testsKees Cook2018-06-051-0/+110
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Make sure that the memory allocators are behaving as expected in the face of overflows of multiplied arguments or when using the array_size()-family helpers. Example output of new tests (with the expected __alloc_pages_slowpath and vmalloc warnings about refusing giant allocations removed): [ 93.062076] test_overflow: kmalloc detected saturation [ 93.062988] test_overflow: kmalloc_node detected saturation [ 93.063818] test_overflow: kzalloc detected saturation [ 93.064539] test_overflow: kzalloc_node detected saturation [ 93.120386] test_overflow: kvmalloc detected saturation [ 93.143458] test_overflow: kvmalloc_node detected saturation [ 93.166861] test_overflow: kvzalloc detected saturation [ 93.189924] test_overflow: kvzalloc_node detected saturation [ 93.221671] test_overflow: vmalloc detected saturation [ 93.246326] test_overflow: vmalloc_node detected saturation [ 93.270260] test_overflow: vzalloc detected saturation [ 93.293824] test_overflow: vzalloc_node detected saturation [ 93.294597] test_overflow: devm_kmalloc detected saturation [ 93.295383] test_overflow: devm_kzalloc detected saturation [ 93.296217] test_overflow: all tests passed Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
* test_overflow: Report test failuresKees Cook2018-06-051-15/+39
| | | | | | | This adjusts the overflow test to report failures, and prepares to add allocation tests. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
* test_overflow: macrofy some more, do more tests for freeRasmus Villemoes2018-06-051-26/+22
| | | | | | | | | | | Obviously a+b==b+a and a*b==b*a, but the implementation of the fallback checks are not entirely symmetric in how they treat a and b. So we might as well check the (b,a,r,of) tuple as well as the (a,b,r,of) one for + and *. Rather than more copy-paste, factor out the common part to check_one_op. Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
* lib: add runtime test of check_*_overflow functionsRasmus Villemoes2018-06-051-0/+287
This adds a small module for testing that the check_*_overflow functions work as expected, whether implemented in C or using gcc builtins. Example output: test_overflow: u8 : 18 tests test_overflow: s8 : 19 tests test_overflow: u16: 17 tests test_overflow: s16: 17 tests test_overflow: u32: 17 tests test_overflow: s32: 17 tests test_overflow: u64: 17 tests test_overflow: s64: 21 tests Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> [kees: add output to commit log, drop u64 tests on 32-bit] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>