| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Pick CXL PMEM security commands for v6.2. Resolve conflicts with the
removal of the cxl_pmem_wq.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Add nvdimm_security_ops support for CXL memory device with the introduction
of the ->get_flags() callback function. This is part of the "Persistent
Memory Data-at-rest Security" command set for CXL memory device support.
The ->get_flags() function provides the security state of the persistent
memory device defined by the CXL 3.0 spec section 8.2.9.8.6.1.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166983609611.2734609.13231854299523325319.stgit@djiang5-desk3.ch.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
| |/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A downstream port must be connected to a component register block.
For restricted hosts the base address is determined from the RCRB. The
RCRB is provided by the host's CEDT CHBS entry. Rework CEDT parser to
get the RCRB and add code to extract the component register block from
it.
RCRB's BAR[0..1] point to the component block containing CXL subsystem
component registers. MEMBAR extraction follows the PCI base spec here,
esp. 64 bit extraction and memory range alignment (6.0, 7.5.1.2.1). The
RCRB base address is cached in the cxl_dport per-host bridge so that the
upstream port component registers can be retrieved later by an RCD
(RCIEP) associated with the host bridge.
Note: Right now the component register block is used for HDM decoder
capability only which is optional for RCDs. If unsupported by the RCD,
the HDM init will fail. It is future work to bypass it in this case.
Co-developed-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Y4dsGZ24aJlxSfI1@rric.localdomain
[djbw: introduce devm_cxl_add_rch_dport()]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166993044524.1882361.2539922887413208807.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
CXL 2.0 allows for dynamic provisioning of new memory regions (system
physical address resources like "System RAM" and "Persistent Memory").
Whereas DDR and PMEM resources are conveyed statically at boot, CXL
allows for assembling and instantiating new regions from the available
capacity of CXL memory expanders in the system.
Sysfs with an "echo $region_name > $create_region_attribute" interface
is chosen as the mechanism to initiate the provisioning process. This
was chosen over ioctl() and netlink() to keep the configuration
interface entirely in a pseudo-fs interface, and it was chosen over
configfs since, aside from this one creation event, the interface is
read-mostly. I.e. configfs supports cases where an object is designed to
be provisioned each boot, like an iSCSI storage target, and CXL region
creation is mostly for PMEM regions which are created usually once
per-lifetime of a server instance. This is an improvement over nvdimm
that pre-created "seed" devices that tended to confuse users looking to
determine which devices are active and which are idle.
Recall that the major change that CXL brings over previous persistent
memory architectures is the ability to dynamically define new regions.
Compare that to drivers like 'nfit' where the region configuration is
statically defined by platform firmware.
Regions are created as a child of a root decoder that encompasses an
address space with constraints. When created through sysfs, the root
decoder is explicit. When created from an LSA's region structure a root
decoder will possibly need to be inferred by the driver.
Upon region creation through sysfs, a vacant region is created with a
unique name. Regions have a number of attributes that must be configured
before the region can be bound to the driver where HDM decoder program
is completed.
An example of creating a new region:
- Allocate a new region name:
region=$(cat /sys/bus/cxl/devices/decoder0.0/create_pmem_region)
- Create a new region by name:
while
region=$(cat /sys/bus/cxl/devices/decoder0.0/create_pmem_region)
! echo $region > /sys/bus/cxl/devices/decoder0.0/create_pmem_region
do true; done
- Region now exists in sysfs:
stat -t /sys/bus/cxl/devices/decoder0.0/$region
- Delete the region, and name:
echo $region > /sys/bus/cxl/devices/decoder0.0/delete_region
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165784333909.1758207.794374602146306032.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com
[djbw: simplify locking, reword changelog]
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In preparation for changing how the driver handles 'mem_enable' in the CXL
DVSEC control register. Merge the contents of cxl_hdm_decode_init() into
cxl_dvsec_ranges() and rename the combined function cxl_hdm_decode_init().
The possible cleanups and fixes that result from this merge are saved for a
follow-on change.
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165291690027.1426646.10249756632415633752.stgit@dwillia2-xfh
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In preparation for fixing the setting of the 'mem_enabled' bit in CXL
DVSEC Control register, move all CXL DVSEC range enumeration into the
same source file.
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165291688886.1426646.15046138604010482084.stgit@dwillia2-xfh
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Allow cxl_await_media_ready() to be mocked for testing purposes rather
than carrying the maintenance burden of an indirect function call in the
mainline driver.
With the move cxl_await_media_ready() can no longer reuse the mailbox
timeout override, so add a media_ready_timeout module parameter to the
core to backfill.
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165291688340.1426646.4755627801983775011.stgit@dwillia2-xfh
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
At this point the subsystem can enumerate all CXL ports (CXL.mem decode
resources in upstream switch ports and host bridges) in a system. The
last mile is connecting those ports to endpoints.
The cxl_mem driver connects an endpoint device to the platform CXL.mem
protoctol decode-topology. At ->probe() time it walks its
device-topology-ancestry and adds a CXL Port object at every Upstream
Port hop until it gets to CXL root. The CXL root object is only present
after a platform firmware driver registers platform CXL resources. For
ACPI based platform this is managed by the ACPI0017 device and the
cxl_acpi driver.
The ports are registered such that disabling a given port automatically
unregisters all descendant ports, and the chain can only be registered
after the root is established.
Given ACPI device scanning may run asynchronously compared to PCI device
scanning the root driver is tasked with rescanning the bus after the
root successfully probes.
Conversely if any ports in a chain between the root and an endpoint
becomes disconnected it subsequently triggers the endpoint to
unregister. Given lock depenedencies the endpoint unregistration happens
in a workqueue asynchronously. If userspace cares about synchronizing
delayed work after port events the /sys/bus/cxl/flush attribute is
available for that purpose.
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
[djbw: clarify changelog, rework hotplug support]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164398782997.903003.9725273241627693186.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The need for a CXL port driver and a dedicated cxl_bus_type is driven by
a need to simultaneously support 2 independent physical memory decode
domains (cache coherent CXL.mem and uncached PCI.mmio) that also
intersect at a single PCIe device node. A CXL Port is a device that
advertises a CXL Component Register block with an "HDM Decoder
Capability Structure".
>From Documentation/driver-api/cxl/memory-devices.rst:
Similar to how a RAID driver takes disk objects and assembles them into
a new logical device, the CXL subsystem is tasked to take PCIe and ACPI
objects and assemble them into a CXL.mem decode topology. The need for
runtime configuration of the CXL.mem topology is also similar to RAID in
that different environments with the same hardware configuration may
decide to assemble the topology in contrasting ways. One may choose
performance (RAID0) striping memory across multiple Host Bridges and
endpoints while another may opt for fault tolerance and disable any
striping in the CXL.mem topology.
The port driver identifies whether an endpoint Memory Expander is
connected to a CXL topology. If an active (bound to the 'cxl_port'
driver) CXL Port is not found at every PCIe Switch Upstream port and an
active "root" CXL Port then the device is just a plain PCIe endpoint
only capable of participating in PCI.mmio and DMA cycles, not CXL.mem
coherent interleave sets.
The 'cxl_port' driver lets the CXL subsystem leverage driver-core
infrastructure for setup and teardown of register resources and
communicating device activation status to userspace. The cxl_bus_type
can rendezvous the async arrival of platform level CXL resources (via
the 'cxl_acpi' driver) with the asynchronous enumeration of Memory
Expander endpoints, while also implementing a hierarchical locking model
independent of the associated 'struct pci_dev' locking model. The
locking for dport and decoder enumeration is now handled in the core
rather than callers.
For now the port driver only enumerates and registers CXL resources
(downstream port metadata and decoder resources) later it will be used
to take action on its decoders in response to CXL.mem region
provisioning requests.
Note1: cxlpci.h has long depended on pci.h, but port.c was the first to
not include pci.h. Carry that dependency in cxlpci.h.
Note2: cxl port enumeration and probing complicates CXL subsystem init
to the point that it helps to have centralized debug logging of probe
events in cxl_bus_probe().
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Co-developed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164374948116.464348.1772618057599155408.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Unlike the decoder enumeration for "root decoders" described by platform
firmware, standard decoders can be enumerated from the component
registers space once the base address has been identified (via PCI,
ACPI, or another mechanism).
Add common infrastructure for HDM (Host-managed-Device-Memory) Decoder
enumeration and share it between host-bridge, upstream switch port, and
cxl_test defined decoders.
The locking model for switch level decoders is to hold the port lock
over the enumeration. This facilitates moving the dport and decoder
enumeration to a 'port' driver. For now, the only enumerator of decoder
resources is the cxl_acpi root driver.
Co-developed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164374688404.395335.9239248252443123526.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The core houses infrastructure for decoder resources. A CXL port's
dports are more closely related to decoder infrastructure than topology
enumeration. Implement generic PCI based dport enumeration in the core,
i.e. arrange for existing root port enumeration from cxl_acpi to share
code with switch port enumeration which just amounts to a small
difference in a pci_walk_bus() invocation once the appropriate 'struct
pci_bus' has been retrieved.
Set the convention that decoder objects are registered after all dports
are enumerated. This enables userspace to know when the CXL core is
finished establishing 'dportX' links underneath the 'portX' object.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164368114191.354031.5270501846455462665.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In preparation for switch port enumeration while also preserving the
potential for multi-domain / multi-root CXL topologies. Introduce a
'struct device' generic mechanism for retrieving a root CXL port, if one
is registered. Note that the only known multi-domain CXL configurations
are running the cxl_test unit test on a system that also publishes an
ACPI0017 device.
With this in hand the nvdimm-bridge lookup can be with
device_find_child() instead of bus_find_device() + custom mocked lookup
infrastructure in cxl_test.
The mechanism looks for a 2nd level port since the root level topology
is platform-firmware specific and the 2nd level down follows standard
PCIe topology expectations. The cxl_acpi 2nd level is associated with a
PCIe Root Port.
Reported-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164367562182.225521.9488555616768096049.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Given it is dominated by port infrastructure, and will only acquire
more, rename bus.c to port.c.
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164298416136.3018233.15442880970000855425.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that cxl_acpi has been converted to use the core ACPI CEDT sub-table
parser, update cxl_test to inject CFMWS and CHBS data directly into
cxl_acpi's handlers.
Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163553711363.2509508.17428994087868269952.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Introduce an emulated device-set plus driver to register CXL memory
devices, 'struct cxl_memdev' instances, in the mock cxl_test topology.
This enables the development of HDM Decoder (Host-managed Device Memory
Decoder) programming flow (region provisioning) in an environment that
can be updated alongside the kernel as it gains more functionality.
Whereas the cxl_pci module looks for CXL memory expanders on the 'pci'
bus, the cxl_mock_mem module attaches to CXL expanders on the platform
bus emitted by cxl_test.
Acked-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163116440099.2460985.10692549614409346604.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
|
|
Create an environment for CXL plumbing unit tests. Especially when it
comes to an algorithm for HDM Decoder (Host-managed Device Memory
Decoder) programming, the availability of an in-kernel-tree emulation
environment for CXL configuration complexity and corner cases speeds
development and deters regressions.
The approach taken mirrors what was done for tools/testing/nvdimm/. I.e.
an external module, cxl_test.ko built out of the tools/testing/cxl/
directory, provides mock implementations of kernel APIs and kernel
objects to simulate a real world device hierarchy.
One feedback for the tools/testing/nvdimm/ proposal was "why not do this
in QEMU?". In fact, the CXL development community has developed a QEMU
model for CXL [1]. However, there are a few blocking issues that keep
QEMU from being a tight fit for topology + provisioning unit tests:
1/ The QEMU community has yet to show interest in merging any of this
support that has had patches on the list since November 2020. So,
testing CXL to date involves building custom QEMU with out-of-tree
patches.
2/ CXL mechanisms like cross-host-bridge interleave do not have a clear
path to be emulated by QEMU without major infrastructure work. This
is easier to achieve with the alloc_mock_res() approach taken in this
patch to shortcut-define emulated system physical address ranges with
interleave behavior.
The QEMU enabling has been critical to get the driver off the ground,
and may still move forward, but it does not address the ongoing needs of
a regression testing environment and test driven development.
This patch adds an ACPI CXL Platform definition with emulated CXL
multi-ported host-bridges. A follow on patch adds emulated memory
expander devices.
Acked-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Reported-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210202005948.241655-1-ben.widawsky@intel.com [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163164680798.2831381.838684634806668012.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
|
