| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When injecting an IRQ to the VGIC, you now have to present an owner
token for that IRQ line to show that you are the owner of that line.
IRQ lines driven from userspace or via an irqfd do not have an owner and
will simply pass a NULL pointer.
Also get rid of the unused kvm_vgic_inject_mapped_irq prototype.
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since we got support for devices in userspace which allows reporting the
PMU overflow output status to userspace, we should actually allow
creating the PMU on systems without an in-kernel irqchip, which in turn
requires us to slightly clarify error codes for the ABI and move things
around for the initialization phase.
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Don't use request-less VCPU kicks when injecting IRQs, as a VCPU
kick meant to trigger the interrupt injection could be sent while
the VCPU is outside guest mode, which means no IPI is sent, and
after it has called kvm_vgic_flush_hwstate(), meaning it won't see
the updated GIC state until its next exit some time later for some
other reason. The receiving VCPU only needs to check this request
in VCPU RUN to handle it. By checking it, if it's pending, a
memory barrier will be issued that ensures all state is visible.
See "Ensuring Requests Are Seen" of
Documentation/virtual/kvm/vcpu-requests.rst
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A request called EXIT is too generic. All requests are meant to cause
exits, but different requests have different flags. Let's not make
it difficult to decide if the EXIT request is correct for some case
by just always providing unique requests for each case. This patch
changes EXIT to SLEEP, because that's what the request is asking the
VCPU to do.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We can make a small optimization by not checking the state of
the power_off field on each run. This is done by treating
power_off like pause, only checking it when we get the EXIT
VCPU request. When a VCPU powers off another VCPU the EXIT
request is already made, so we just need to make sure the
request is also made on self power off. kvm_vcpu_kick() isn't
necessary for these cases, as the VCPU would just be kicking
itself, but we add it anyway as a self kick doesn't cost much,
and it makes the code more future-proof.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The current use of KVM_REQ_VCPU_EXIT for pause is fine. Even the
requester clearing the request is OK, as this is the special case
where the sole requesting thread and receiving VCPU are executing
synchronously (see "Clearing Requests" in
Documentation/virtual/kvm/vcpu-requests.rst) However, that's about
to change, so let's ensure only the receiving VCPU clears the
request. Additionally, by guaranteeing KVM_REQ_VCPU_EXIT is always
set when pause is, we can avoid checking pause directly in VCPU RUN.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
arm/arm64 already has one VCPU request used when setting pause,
but it doesn't properly check requests in VCPU RUN. Check it
and also make sure we set vcpu->mode at the appropriate time
(before the check) and with the appropriate barriers. See
Documentation/virtual/kvm/vcpu-requests.rst. Also make sure we
don't leave any vcpu requests we don't intend to handle later
set in the request bitmap. If we don't clear them, then
kvm_request_pending() may return true when it shouldn't.
Using VCPU requests properly fixes a small race where pause
could get set just as a VCPU was entering guest mode.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We don't need to stop a specific VCPU when changing the active state,
because private IRQs can only be modified by a running VCPU for the
VCPU itself and it is therefore already stopped.
However, it is also possible for two VCPUs to be modifying the active
state of SPIs at the same time, which can cause the thread being stuck
in the loop that checks other VCPU threads for a potentially very long
time, or to modify the active state of a running VCPU. Fix this by
serializing all accesses to setting and clearing the active state of
interrupts using the KVM mutex.
Reported-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD
Second round of KVM/ARM Changes for v4.12.
Changes include:
- A fix related to the 32-bit idmap stub
- A fix to the bitmask used to deode the operands of an AArch32 CP
instruction
- We have moved the files shared between arch/arm/kvm and
arch/arm64/kvm to virt/kvm/arm
- We add support for saving/restoring the virtual ITS state to
userspace
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of waiting with registering KVM iodevs until the first VCPU is
run, we can actually create the iodevs when the redist base address is
set. The only downside is that we must now also check if we need to do
this for VCPUs which are created after creating the VGIC, because there
is no enforced ordering between creating the VGIC (and setting its base
addresses) and creating the VCPUs.
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
|
|
|
For some time now we have been having a lot of shared functionality
between the arm and arm64 KVM support in arch/arm, which not only
required a horrible inter-arch reference from the Makefile in
arch/arm64/kvm, but also created confusion for newcomers to the code
base, as was recently seen on the mailing list.
Further, it causes confusion for things like cscope, which needs special
attention to index specific shared files for arm64 from the arm tree.
Move the shared files into virt/kvm/arm and move the trace points along
with it. When moving the tracepoints we have to modify the way the vgic
creates definitions of the trace points, so we take the chance to
include the VGIC tracepoints in its very own special vgic trace.h file.
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>
|
