From b34cb07dde7c2346dec73d053ce926aeaa087303 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Phil Auld Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 09:52:22 -0400 Subject: sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair() warning some more sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning some more The recent patch, fe61468b2cb (sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning) did not fully resolve the issues with the rq->tmp_alone_branch != &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list warning in enqueue_task_fair. There is a case where the first for_each_sched_entity loop exits due to on_rq, having incompletely updated the list. In this case the second for_each_sched_entity loop can further modify se. The later code to fix up the list management fails to do what is needed because se does not point to the sched_entity which broke out of the first loop. The list is not fixed up because the throttled parent was already added back to the list by a task enqueue in a parallel child hierarchy. Address this by calling list_add_leaf_cfs_rq if there are throttled parents while doing the second for_each_sched_entity loop. Fixes: fe61468b2cb ("sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning") Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot Signed-off-by: Phil Auld Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200512135222.GC2201@lorien.usersys.redhat.com --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 02f323b85b6d..c6d57c334d51 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -5479,6 +5479,13 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags) /* end evaluation on encountering a throttled cfs_rq */ if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq)) goto enqueue_throttle; + + /* + * One parent has been throttled and cfs_rq removed from the + * list. Add it back to not break the leaf list. + */ + if (throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq)) + list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq); } enqueue_throttle: -- cgit v1.2.3 From ad32bb41fca67936c0c1d6d0bdd6d3e2e9c5432f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavankumar Kondeti Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 18:26:41 +0530 Subject: sched/debug: Fix requested task uclamp values shown in procfs The intention of commit 96e74ebf8d59 ("sched/debug: Add task uclamp values to SCHED_DEBUG procfs") was to print requested and effective task uclamp values. The requested values printed are read from p->uclamp, which holds the last effective values. Fix this by printing the values from p->uclamp_req. Fixes: 96e74ebf8d59 ("sched/debug: Add task uclamp values to SCHED_DEBUG procfs") Signed-off-by: Pavankumar Kondeti Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider Tested-by: Valentin Schneider Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1589115401-26391-1-git-send-email-pkondeti@codeaurora.org --- kernel/sched/debug.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c index a562df57a86e..239970b991c0 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c @@ -948,8 +948,8 @@ void proc_sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p, struct pid_namespace *ns, P(se.avg.util_est.enqueued); #endif #ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK - __PS("uclamp.min", p->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN].value); - __PS("uclamp.max", p->uclamp[UCLAMP_MAX].value); + __PS("uclamp.min", p->uclamp_req[UCLAMP_MIN].value); + __PS("uclamp.max", p->uclamp_req[UCLAMP_MAX].value); __PS("effective uclamp.min", uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MIN)); __PS("effective uclamp.max", uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX)); #endif -- cgit v1.2.3 From 39f23ce07b9355d05a64ae303ce20d1c4b92b957 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vincent Guittot Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 15:55:28 +0200 Subject: sched/fair: Fix unthrottle_cfs_rq() for leaf_cfs_rq list Although not exactly identical, unthrottle_cfs_rq() and enqueue_task_fair() are quite close and follow the same sequence for enqueuing an entity in the cfs hierarchy. Modify unthrottle_cfs_rq() to use the same pattern as enqueue_task_fair(). This fixes a problem already faced with the latter and add an optimization in the last for_each_sched_entity loop. Fixes: fe61468b2cb (sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning) Reported-by Tao Zhou Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Phil Auld Reviewed-by: Ben Segall Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200513135528.4742-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index c6d57c334d51..538ba5d94e99 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -4774,7 +4774,6 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq); struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = tg_cfs_bandwidth(cfs_rq->tg); struct sched_entity *se; - int enqueue = 1; long task_delta, idle_task_delta; se = cfs_rq->tg->se[cpu_of(rq)]; @@ -4798,26 +4797,44 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) idle_task_delta = cfs_rq->idle_h_nr_running; for_each_sched_entity(se) { if (se->on_rq) - enqueue = 0; + break; + cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se); + enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP); + cfs_rq->h_nr_running += task_delta; + cfs_rq->idle_h_nr_running += idle_task_delta; + + /* end evaluation on encountering a throttled cfs_rq */ + if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq)) + goto unthrottle_throttle; + } + + for_each_sched_entity(se) { cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se); - if (enqueue) { - enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP); - } else { - update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, 0); - se_update_runnable(se); - } + + update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, UPDATE_TG); + se_update_runnable(se); cfs_rq->h_nr_running += task_delta; cfs_rq->idle_h_nr_running += idle_task_delta; + + /* end evaluation on encountering a throttled cfs_rq */ if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq)) - break; + goto unthrottle_throttle; + + /* + * One parent has been throttled and cfs_rq removed from the + * list. Add it back to not break the leaf list. + */ + if (throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq)) + list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq); } - if (!se) - add_nr_running(rq, task_delta); + /* At this point se is NULL and we are at root level*/ + add_nr_running(rq, task_delta); +unthrottle_throttle: /* * The cfs_rq_throttled() breaks in the above iteration can result in * incomplete leaf list maintenance, resulting in triggering the @@ -4826,7 +4843,8 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) for_each_sched_entity(se) { cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se); - list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq); + if (list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq)) + break; } assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq(rq); -- cgit v1.2.3