From c4af9e00894575797395e6cdd98b3a227ee70e29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Randy Dunlap Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 15:10:49 -0800 Subject: Documentation: RCU: Correct spelling Correct spelling problems for Documentation/RCU/ as reported by codespell. Note: in RTFP.txt, there are other misspellings that are left as is since they were used that way in email Subject: lines or in LWN.net articles. [preemptable, Preemptable, synchonisation] Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap Cc: Jonathan Corbet Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay Cc: Josh Triplett Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) --- Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt') diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt b/Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt index 588d97366a46..db8f16b392aa 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt +++ b/Documentation/RCU/RTFP.txt @@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ work looked at debugging uses of RCU [Seyster:2011:RFA:2075416.2075425]. In 2012, Josh Triplett received his Ph.D. with his dissertation covering RCU-protected resizable hash tables and the relationship between memory barriers and read-side traversal order: If the updater -is making changes in the opposite direction from the read-side traveral +is making changes in the opposite direction from the read-side traversal order, the updater need only execute a memory-barrier instruction, but if in the same direction, the updater needs to wait for a grace period between the individual updates [JoshTriplettPhD]. Also in 2012, @@ -1245,7 +1245,7 @@ Oregon Health and Sciences University" [Viewed September 5, 2005]" ,annotation={ First posting showing how RCU can be safely adapted for - preemptable RCU read side critical sections. + preemptible RCU read side critical sections. } } @@ -1888,7 +1888,7 @@ Revised: \url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20070910183004.GA3299@linux.vnet.ibm.com} [Viewed October 25, 2007]" ,annotation={ - Final patch for preemptable RCU to -rt. (Later patches were + Final patch for preemptible RCU to -rt. (Later patches were to mainline, eventually incorporated.) } } @@ -2275,7 +2275,7 @@ lot of {Linux} into your technology!!!" \url{https://lore.kernel.org/r/20090724001429.GA17374@linux.vnet.ibm.com} [Viewed August 15, 2009]" ,annotation={ - First posting of simple and fast preemptable RCU. + First posting of simple and fast preemptible RCU. } } @@ -2639,7 +2639,7 @@ lot of {Linux} into your technology!!!" RCU-protected hash tables, barriers vs. read-side traversal order. . If the updater is making changes in the opposite direction from - the read-side traveral order, the updater need only execute a + the read-side traversal order, the updater need only execute a memory-barrier instruction, but if in the same direction, the updater needs to wait for a grace period between the individual updates. -- cgit v1.2.3