From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100 Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c') diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c index 5e2e2218a402..56128da23c3a 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c @@ -369,9 +369,9 @@ static bool use_gptimer_clksrc __initdata; /* * clocksource */ -static cycle_t clocksource_read_cycles(struct clocksource *cs) +static u64 clocksource_read_cycles(struct clocksource *cs) { - return (cycle_t)__omap_dm_timer_read_counter(&clksrc, + return (u64)__omap_dm_timer_read_counter(&clksrc, OMAP_TIMER_NONPOSTED); } -- cgit v1.2.3