From f2e0cff85ed111a3cf24d894c3fa11697dfae628 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicholas Piggin Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 14:35:43 -0700 Subject: kernel/watchdog: introduce arch_touch_nmi_watchdog() For architectures that define HAVE_NMI_WATCHDOG, instead of having them provide the complete touch_nmi_watchdog() function, just have them provide arch_touch_nmi_watchdog(). This gives the generic code more flexibility in implementing this function, and arch implementations don't miss out on touching the softlockup watchdog or other generic details. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170616065715.18390-3-npiggin@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin Reviewed-by: Don Zickus Reviewed-by: Babu Moger Tested-by: Babu Moger [sparc] Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Michael Ellerman Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- arch/mn10300/kernel/mn10300-watchdog.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch/mn10300/kernel/mn10300-watchdog.c') diff --git a/arch/mn10300/kernel/mn10300-watchdog.c b/arch/mn10300/kernel/mn10300-watchdog.c index a2d8e6938d67..0d5641beadf5 100644 --- a/arch/mn10300/kernel/mn10300-watchdog.c +++ b/arch/mn10300/kernel/mn10300-watchdog.c @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static unsigned int watchdog; static unsigned int watchdog_hz = 1; unsigned int watchdog_alert_counter[NR_CPUS]; -EXPORT_SYMBOL(touch_nmi_watchdog); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_touch_nmi_watchdog); /* * the best way to detect whether a CPU has a 'hard lockup' problem -- cgit v1.2.3