From 4f701d1e9a796a3d6657e1129bee0566d7cda916 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alan Cox Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:55:36 +0100 Subject: ata_timing: ensure t->cycle is always correct Russell King hit a case where quantisation errors accumulated such that the cycle time was shorter than rather than equal to the active/recovery time. The code already knows how to stretch times to fit the cycle time but does not know about the reverse. Signed-off-by: Alan Cox Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) (limited to 'drivers/ata') diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c index 227399e48470..4e1df5382b9a 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c @@ -2639,6 +2639,12 @@ int ata_timing_compute(struct ata_device *adev, unsigned short speed, t->active += (t->cycle - (t->active + t->recover)) / 2; t->recover = t->cycle - t->active; } + + /* In a few cases quantisation may produce enough errors to + leave t->cycle too low for the sum of active and recovery + if so we must correct this */ + if (t->active + t->recover > t->cycle) + t->cycle = t->active + t->recover; return 0; } -- cgit v1.2.3